Robert Pickthall
Below is a real life timeline of information on the Murder of Robert Pickthall, in ascending order. New information is at the top of the page, old information is at the bottom
WHO IS ROBERT PICKTHALL?
People here are the answers condensed as much as I possibly can.
1. To me one of the best and most loyal friends I ever had.
2. To the establishment he was the enemy who was shouting too loudly about inside corruption and theft from the public.......
. Discovered council had stolen protected public land and cashed in on its sell off with no accountability for the profit.
. Demanded answers, contacted every councillor, executive, mp, attorney general, police, you name them, he contacted them in his pursuit of accountability to the public. THIS THEFT WAS OF OUR LAND, YOURS AND MINE!
. Cheshire West and Chester council ( the perpetrators) didn’t like this exposure put up on Bobs website “The bloodhound” where he stated all the facts, displayed his correspondence and evidence.
.To shut him up the council had his house raided by armed police claiming he was maliciously, and vindictively harassing them ( no reason given as to any motive) but they said he’d sent 1200 malicious emails.
. THEY WANTED HIM CHARGED UNDER CRIMINAL RULES FOR HARASSMENT. In criminal procedures the evidence must be produced or police must believe they can produce the evidence BEFORE charging a person.
.Bobs computer equipment, phone and all electronic devices were seized for police to obtain the evidence.
.For 5 months police traveled through Bobs devices, eventually returning it to Bob without charging him, and told the council THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE TO CHARGE HIM. I REPEAT.... NO EVIDENCE OF 1200 ABUSIVE, HARASSING EMAILS!
. Bob continued his pursuit for accountability and put a case together to sue his council. HE WOULD HAVE WON!
. In desperation to avoid public outrage his council brought in expert in harassment law barrister ADAM SPEKER OF LONDONS 5 RB CHAMBERS.
. ADAM SPEKER would have his high fees paid from the public purse, this was a very lucrative deal for him!
. He obtained an injunction to shut Bob up under the harassment act via CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES ( NOT CRIMINAL RULES AS WAS THE CASE EARLIER)
. Under civil rules there was no requirement to provide proof of harassment UNTIL THE CASE AGAINST THE COUNCIL ISSUED BY BOB, WAS HEARD IN COURT, therefore under the guise of harassment Adam Speker obtained the gagging order so desperately needed by the council to silence Bob.
. Adam Speker abused the judicial process in having no intention of ever allowing Bobs case to get to trial . . .
.Knowing there was no evidence to prove harassment Adam Speker then applied for summary judgement to have Bobs case against council struck out and being a top notch lawyer succeeded in doing so on a technicality! BUT THE HARASSMENT ORDER OBTAINED FOR THE COUNCIL STILL STOOD!
. Bob refused to be silenced and the council had him sent to Strangeways for 3 months. Bob was a pensioner, he’d suffered 9 heart attacks, was registered disabled ,had other serious ailments and wasn’t in the best of health to say to say the least. To say his stint in Strangeways was difficult would be an understatement!
. I was in court with him on the day he was sent down, the day that Bob revealed in open court that he’d discovered THROUGH CASELAW IN WHICH ADAM SPEAKER HIMSELF WAS INVOLVED, THAT THE COUNCIL COULD NOT LAWFULLY FUND A CASE AGAINST A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC IN THE MANNER IN WHICH THEY WERE.
. ADAM SPEKER AND CHESTER COUNCIL HAD FOR APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS KNOWINGLY AND UNLAWFULLY PLUNDERED THE PUBLIC PURSE TO STOP BOB FROM REVEALING WHAT HE KNEW.
. Bobs good name was trawled through the mud, he was demonised as a horrible old man with too much time on his hands that he chose to harass poor hard working public servants .... ITS A FUCKING DISGRACE WHAT THEY DID GO HIM.
.Bob was strong minded and determined and after his release he carried on with his quest.
.Recently the information commissioner upheld Bobs right to make Chester council comply with disclosing the 1200 abusive emails they claimed to have which had gotten them their precious harassment order. Bob also managed to gain the services of a solicitor to represent him pro bono.
. As soon as the council heard this they got their crooked legal team to summon Bob back to court for breach of the harassment order before he could get them into court.
. Bob is now dead, his remains having been found on the railway lines of Acton bridge train station. His death is being treated as suicide.
. Bobs bank account has been emptied .
. Bobs remains are at an unknown location.
. A person who lied in claimed Bob had no family or close friends has claimed right as NOK and wants his remains cremating.
. Bob was alive and having banter on the phone with his close friend Alan Dransfield at 10 pm. At Proximately two hours later, his dead body is found on a railway line several miles away.
NOW CAN ANYONE REALISTICALLY BELIEVE THERE ARE NO SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES HERE?????
POLICE APPEAR MORE THAN A LITTLE RELUCTANT TO INVESTIGATE DESPITE IN THEIR WORDS “ HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE CALLING WITH THE SAME CONCERNS.”
People here are the answers condensed as much as I possibly can.
1. To me one of the best and most loyal friends I ever had.
2. To the establishment he was the enemy who was shouting too loudly about inside corruption and theft from the public.......
. Discovered council had stolen protected public land and cashed in on its sell off with no accountability for the profit.
. Demanded answers, contacted every councillor, executive, mp, attorney general, police, you name them, he contacted them in his pursuit of accountability to the public. THIS THEFT WAS OF OUR LAND, YOURS AND MINE!
. Cheshire West and Chester council ( the perpetrators) didn’t like this exposure put up on Bobs website “The bloodhound” where he stated all the facts, displayed his correspondence and evidence.
.To shut him up the council had his house raided by armed police claiming he was maliciously, and vindictively harassing them ( no reason given as to any motive) but they said he’d sent 1200 malicious emails.
. THEY WANTED HIM CHARGED UNDER CRIMINAL RULES FOR HARASSMENT. In criminal procedures the evidence must be produced or police must believe they can produce the evidence BEFORE charging a person.
.Bobs computer equipment, phone and all electronic devices were seized for police to obtain the evidence.
.For 5 months police traveled through Bobs devices, eventually returning it to Bob without charging him, and told the council THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE TO CHARGE HIM. I REPEAT.... NO EVIDENCE OF 1200 ABUSIVE, HARASSING EMAILS!
. Bob continued his pursuit for accountability and put a case together to sue his council. HE WOULD HAVE WON!
. In desperation to avoid public outrage his council brought in expert in harassment law barrister ADAM SPEKER OF LONDONS 5 RB CHAMBERS.
. ADAM SPEKER would have his high fees paid from the public purse, this was a very lucrative deal for him!
. He obtained an injunction to shut Bob up under the harassment act via CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES ( NOT CRIMINAL RULES AS WAS THE CASE EARLIER)
. Under civil rules there was no requirement to provide proof of harassment UNTIL THE CASE AGAINST THE COUNCIL ISSUED BY BOB, WAS HEARD IN COURT, therefore under the guise of harassment Adam Speker obtained the gagging order so desperately needed by the council to silence Bob.
. Adam Speker abused the judicial process in having no intention of ever allowing Bobs case to get to trial . . .
.Knowing there was no evidence to prove harassment Adam Speker then applied for summary judgement to have Bobs case against council struck out and being a top notch lawyer succeeded in doing so on a technicality! BUT THE HARASSMENT ORDER OBTAINED FOR THE COUNCIL STILL STOOD!
. Bob refused to be silenced and the council had him sent to Strangeways for 3 months. Bob was a pensioner, he’d suffered 9 heart attacks, was registered disabled ,had other serious ailments and wasn’t in the best of health to say to say the least. To say his stint in Strangeways was difficult would be an understatement!
. I was in court with him on the day he was sent down, the day that Bob revealed in open court that he’d discovered THROUGH CASELAW IN WHICH ADAM SPEAKER HIMSELF WAS INVOLVED, THAT THE COUNCIL COULD NOT LAWFULLY FUND A CASE AGAINST A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC IN THE MANNER IN WHICH THEY WERE.
. ADAM SPEKER AND CHESTER COUNCIL HAD FOR APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS KNOWINGLY AND UNLAWFULLY PLUNDERED THE PUBLIC PURSE TO STOP BOB FROM REVEALING WHAT HE KNEW.
. Bobs good name was trawled through the mud, he was demonised as a horrible old man with too much time on his hands that he chose to harass poor hard working public servants .... ITS A FUCKING DISGRACE WHAT THEY DID GO HIM.
.Bob was strong minded and determined and after his release he carried on with his quest.
.Recently the information commissioner upheld Bobs right to make Chester council comply with disclosing the 1200 abusive emails they claimed to have which had gotten them their precious harassment order. Bob also managed to gain the services of a solicitor to represent him pro bono.
. As soon as the council heard this they got their crooked legal team to summon Bob back to court for breach of the harassment order before he could get them into court.
. Bob is now dead, his remains having been found on the railway lines of Acton bridge train station. His death is being treated as suicide.
. Bobs bank account has been emptied .
. Bobs remains are at an unknown location.
. A person who lied in claimed Bob had no family or close friends has claimed right as NOK and wants his remains cremating.
. Bob was alive and having banter on the phone with his close friend Alan Dransfield at 10 pm. At Proximately two hours later, his dead body is found on a railway line several miles away.
NOW CAN ANYONE REALISTICALLY BELIEVE THERE ARE NO SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES HERE?????
POLICE APPEAR MORE THAN A LITTLE RELUCTANT TO INVESTIGATE DESPITE IN THEIR WORDS “ HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE CALLING WITH THE SAME CONCERNS.”
tag
On the 7th of August 2019 it was reported that an unknown female witness contacted Carslisle Security. She informed them that she had information regarding another unknown female who had contact with Robert Pickthall IMMEDIATELY BEFORE his murder. This was never followed up by police, only 8 days after his death this report was made and was met with silence.
Instead of investigating the Murder, Theft and Fraud of Robert Pickthall it appears BTP set up a “Major Investigation Unit Review Team" to monitor Justice Watch and Cop Block UK facebook pages CopBlock CopBlock Cop Block UK just like the lead “investigation” officer Ian Henderson was more interested in our page then a death of a man.
As we promised the truth was heard at Robert Pickthall Coroner Inquest on Monday and as to be expected the establishment closed ranks and attempted to cover for each other, the conspiracy was blatant and obvious for all to see in the court room. Even the paint on the walls was peeling off from the smell of Ammonia from the bullshit.
It was made clear by Paul Hughes the ONLY police officer that took the stand who had no connection to the investigation apart from ringing up a few officers asking if they need assistance, he told the court that the Council, Coroner and police forces all work together and all share information on the same system proving just how easy it is for someone to be stalked and harassed by public servants. Under cross questioning by an Interested Party Paul Hughes was asked why several witnesses had not been asked to make statements soon after the incident and instead left it several months for this to happen, his response must have shocked everyone in the court room with his answer which was that often even in murder investigations they don't begin to collect statements until years after the deaths. If this is not utter bullshit then surly to God something needs to change, I wonder how the families of murder victims will feel to learn this. In Paul Hughes written Statement he was more concerned with calling members of the public Conspiracy theorists maybe because his only involvement was from a call by a councillor, everything he said was hearsay and not factual evidence. Why was he even chosen by the coroner to give evidence in this inquest when he had no part in the “investigation” connected to the death? Why didn’t the coroner choose even one single police officer who was actually involved in the case to give evidence?
The lead investigator Detective Ian Henderson failed to show up and take the stand because he knew he would have been ripped to pieces, instead he sent an A4 sheet with a 20 line summery of his “Investigation” which most of it he used to call members of the public, Robert Pickthall friends and legal NOK as Conspiracy theorists. His investigation file was not made public to anyone, not even the Coroner had access to it or even asked for it, when the legal NOK asked how would she be able to get a copy the officer who took the stand said she could get it through a FOI request which was a lie, a lie he told under oath by the way.
The Coroner Peter Sigee failed to read out vital parts to police statements such as how Robert Picthall was decapitated and found naked apart from his jogging pants that where pulled down to his knees, no explanation to this or the where the rest of his clothes where. He failed to report that he had a large, deep circular wound going around his torso, he had what appeared defensive wounds on his hand and most importantly his legs where trapped in disused rail which assuming cause the fracters to his legs which is very strange. His body was in intact apart from the head which can only mean he was placed laying down with his neck on the live railway track. Even more stranger was an empty Olive green duffle bag with no explanation to why it was there which apparently had a blue (or yellow) sticky note containing train times stuck to it, the post it note must have been water proof and stuck down with Gorilla Glue and duck tape to withstand the rain and wind from that night. This exhibit was never shown and the times written on it not revealed, why? How do we know if the times written weren’t in relation to him meeting someone? someone who he thought he was meeting to collect documents or something else from for his court hearing the following morning! ...was that the purpose of the empty bag? No account, not even one theory was suggested in order to account for why he would take an empty bag with him to commit pre meditated suicide! .....and doesn’t that EMPTY BAG, with the strategically placed post it note on top, found PLACED (not thrown or discarded) just a few yards before the body .....all ready to be discovered before getting to his body, appear all a bit staged? It appears to be the case with this inquest, that when there are issues raised that require answers due to there being no explanation, despite no lines of inquiry having taken place in an attempt to find answers, the coroner has simply ignored those issues!
Further Issues were raised around these serious unexplained injuries one of them being a deep laceration around the torso NOT LISTED by the pathologist in his report. When an interested party asked about this injury being unlisted by the pathologist, the coroner attempted to play it down by stating that not all injuries are always listed by pathologists if such minor injuries tie in with the cause of death, to which the interested person stated that the unlisted injury was not minor but was a significant large injury that did not appear to connect to the direct cause of death ( head injury due to being hit by a train) the coroner had no answer for this! and further concerns raised of no causation expert being consulted to establish the mechanics of how this unlisted injury could have happened, were met by the coroner
repeatedly stating that the the pathologist was an expert in causation of death which he identified as a head injury....the interested person made clear there was no disputing the cause of death, or that the pathologist is an expert in establishing the cause of death, the issue was, that only an expert specialising in the mechanics of how that large unlisted injury could have occurred would be able to establish if it tied in with the fatal injury ( if it did) and then be able to rule out foul play......oh, we may not have mentioned this before but there was also broken blue rope tied to the discarded piece of rail!
NO PICTURES, NO VIDEOS, NO AUDIO RECORDINGS, NO CCTV, Even the Taxi driver was NOT SHOWN A PICTURE of Robert Pickthall to ID him, no evidence to prove suicide apart from a email from a hacked account.
The Coroner failed to mention a woman who’d called Carlisle Security, (we assume) she was on a train passing going through Acton Bridge, that witnessed another woman with a Robert Pickthall just before his death, her statement was never chased up!
A member of the public presented an email from the Coroner stating that the “suicide” was in fact reported as a “homicide” from the very start of the investigation whilst AT THE SCENE, despite this email being sent from the coroners office so there was no disputing the information, it was ignored by the Coroner but he was quick to have it put on record hurryingly going through his diary proving he was not the Coroner that sent that email.
He also failed to take into account that Robert Pickthall emails was hacked on the day he died, and accepted without doubt the alleged email that was sent to the fake NOK from Robert Pickthall email address claiming he was leaving EVERYTHING to her. He failed to mention that Robert Pickthall clearly stated he was worried that someone had been in his house going through his files days before his death.
He also ignored that fact that the fake NOK appointed by the police was texting an associate about how she knew the exact times of when Robert Pickthall had left his house and got into the taxi and was pleading with them to keep it a secret.
He ignored the texts from the fake NOK stating that the Coroner has broken all the rules for her.
He failed to mention that the Police had not collected Robert Pickthall mobile phone and instead left it with the fake NOK until we got involved. He failed to mention that the fake NOK never contacted the family until the family contacted us.
He ignored the texts from the fake NOK stating that the police told her to take down her facebook page and not to release any information to the public.
He ignore the Text from the fake NOK stating she had filtered Robert Pickthalls money and ignored the oral evidence by a witness that the Fake NOK had told her face to face that she had filtered Robert Pickthall money from his bank account but was going to say he had gifted it to her. He ignored how the fake NOK gave three different accounts of where she was that day, the coroner also ignored fact that several persons had confirmed the fake NOK was not in fact his partner and without challenge he at all times referred to her and led the court to believe that she was in fact his partner, which enabled the lie to be further spread by the presstitutes in attendances by putting it out to the public.
After All of these texts messages and emails where shown, the Coroner unbelievably told the court he was adjourning so he could speak alone in his chambers with Paul Hughes that earlier mentioned only police officer in the room who was also a called by him as a WITNESS, this quick meeting gives speculation that the Coroner and Police were colluding. After this meeting it was clear the verdict was going to be “Suicide” but when you have a Coroner who is employed by the same Council who works closely with the police that raged war against Robert Pickthall this was ALWAYS going to be biased. The fake NOK was seen to be sat next to what looks like a police officer or a police liaison officer which also proves how biased this whole proceedings was going to be. The coroner also appeared to cherry pick parts of the text messages between Robert Pickthall and the fake NOK which made the text messages appear to be referring to suicide, had he read out the entire contents of the text massages then it would be more suggestive that the conversation between the two was not referring to suicide at all, for example how Robert Pictkthall was asked if he had ironed a clean shirt (to attend his court hearing the next day) and his response was that had bought a new shirt for the occasion. These text messages have not been released even in pre disclosed evidence, interested party’s could only view them via appointment at the coroners office, no copies were allowed to be taken, printed or photographed, however short notes were allowed to be taken. The real NOK has viewed these txt messages and confirmed the information written about them.
The fake NOK refused to take the stand just like the lead investigator Ian Henderson, which would have enabled her to be questioned. Those that did take the stand apart from the police Officer, did so because they cared and loved Robert Pickthall and wanted him have a right to defend himself from these allegations that he killed himself.
The coroner failed to read out the lies in Paul Hughs statement which stated that Robert Pickthall family were supportive of the police findings and did not support the attendance of what he calls Conspiracy theorists at the inquest, proven to be lies as his daughter supported by a family member approached us and confirmed the family’s full support of us and our investigations and agreed that the inquest appeared to be withholding evidence. Even after the inquest, due to the lack of information provided by the coroner we had to inform them of the grisly details of Robert Pickthall’s death of which they were unaware, despite it being distressing they still wanted to know.... AND THEY HAD A RIGHT TO KNOW, it is not the coroners place to make assumptions that loved ones won’t want to know the facts or details, Otis not within his jurisdiction to make such decisions!
The omitted injuries (both listed and unlisted by the pathologist) by the coroner are proven as omitted by the fact that the media whores in attendance made no mention of those facts, we even approached them outside the Court House to beg them to do real journalism in their articles about this Inquest.
Robert Pickthall was killed because the Council would not allow him to have access to a copy of the emails that he alleged to have sent that was alleged to have been abusive to council members, he was jailed twice in Strangeways without a single email being presented, even though by law this is required as standard disclosure that must be complied with..... an elderly, disabled gent, with a serious heart condition sentenced to prison without one single email being presented to prove him guilty as charged, not to mention the fact that the councils barrister was appointed illegally, his huge fees being paid for from public funds, their barrister ADAM SPEKER, 5 RB CHAMBERS himself had proven it to be illegal himself in a case that HE WON which was Sunderland Housing company & others v Baines and others 2006 for those with understanding look it up! JW have an ongoing issue with bringing this barrister to account, having filed criminal proceedings and requesting a warrant for his arrest Wirral magistrates court legal teams are refusing to progress the case into the courtroom, despite their legal team having zero grounds to challenge it, we have Passed on complaints to HMCTS CEO Susan Acland Hood who has already been assured by WMC that they would deal with the issue, that was several weeks ago, a second letter of complaint of non compliance with court rules has been sent and a couple of days ago we received confirmation that the matter is being looked into! Police refuse to prosecute the seemingly untouchable Mr SPEKER despite THEIR OWN POLICE LEGAL TEAMS BEING UNABLE TO CHALLENGE OUR ALLEGATION AND SUPPORTED DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE..... You see how deep this rabbit hole gets when you begin to look deeper, you realise just how convenient this “suicide” theory is for so many officials and trusted public servants, a “suicide” by a man on the verge of proving his innocence by gaining (after almost a decade) his long fought for backing by the ICO to prove his innocence and his set up by those trusted public servants, when put together with so many unanswered questions and lack of investigation, and an inquest headed by a coroner who presents as deliberately obtuse, is a suicide that appears more than just a bit suspicious!
Mr Pickthalls knew with complete certainty that he was almost close enough to touch his personal victory, and with it would have brought down all hells fury......Court Judges would have been sacked, Barristers sacked, Councillors sacked, police officers sacked and presstitutes sued for defamation and slander. It is no doubt that he was killed and it is a fact that a third party financially gained, I let you workout who that was because apparently im just a conspiracy theorist that ONLY PRESENTED FACTUAL EVIDENCE UNDER OATH WHICH WAS ACCEPTED BY THE COURTS AS FACTUAL EVIDENCE.
The fight that Robert Pickthall started has not finished, it has only just begun
It was made clear by Paul Hughes the ONLY police officer that took the stand who had no connection to the investigation apart from ringing up a few officers asking if they need assistance, he told the court that the Council, Coroner and police forces all work together and all share information on the same system proving just how easy it is for someone to be stalked and harassed by public servants. Under cross questioning by an Interested Party Paul Hughes was asked why several witnesses had not been asked to make statements soon after the incident and instead left it several months for this to happen, his response must have shocked everyone in the court room with his answer which was that often even in murder investigations they don't begin to collect statements until years after the deaths. If this is not utter bullshit then surly to God something needs to change, I wonder how the families of murder victims will feel to learn this. In Paul Hughes written Statement he was more concerned with calling members of the public Conspiracy theorists maybe because his only involvement was from a call by a councillor, everything he said was hearsay and not factual evidence. Why was he even chosen by the coroner to give evidence in this inquest when he had no part in the “investigation” connected to the death? Why didn’t the coroner choose even one single police officer who was actually involved in the case to give evidence?
The lead investigator Detective Ian Henderson failed to show up and take the stand because he knew he would have been ripped to pieces, instead he sent an A4 sheet with a 20 line summery of his “Investigation” which most of it he used to call members of the public, Robert Pickthall friends and legal NOK as Conspiracy theorists. His investigation file was not made public to anyone, not even the Coroner had access to it or even asked for it, when the legal NOK asked how would she be able to get a copy the officer who took the stand said she could get it through a FOI request which was a lie, a lie he told under oath by the way.
The Coroner Peter Sigee failed to read out vital parts to police statements such as how Robert Picthall was decapitated and found naked apart from his jogging pants that where pulled down to his knees, no explanation to this or the where the rest of his clothes where. He failed to report that he had a large, deep circular wound going around his torso, he had what appeared defensive wounds on his hand and most importantly his legs where trapped in disused rail which assuming cause the fracters to his legs which is very strange. His body was in intact apart from the head which can only mean he was placed laying down with his neck on the live railway track. Even more stranger was an empty Olive green duffle bag with no explanation to why it was there which apparently had a blue (or yellow) sticky note containing train times stuck to it, the post it note must have been water proof and stuck down with Gorilla Glue and duck tape to withstand the rain and wind from that night. This exhibit was never shown and the times written on it not revealed, why? How do we know if the times written weren’t in relation to him meeting someone? someone who he thought he was meeting to collect documents or something else from for his court hearing the following morning! ...was that the purpose of the empty bag? No account, not even one theory was suggested in order to account for why he would take an empty bag with him to commit pre meditated suicide! .....and doesn’t that EMPTY BAG, with the strategically placed post it note on top, found PLACED (not thrown or discarded) just a few yards before the body .....all ready to be discovered before getting to his body, appear all a bit staged? It appears to be the case with this inquest, that when there are issues raised that require answers due to there being no explanation, despite no lines of inquiry having taken place in an attempt to find answers, the coroner has simply ignored those issues!
Further Issues were raised around these serious unexplained injuries one of them being a deep laceration around the torso NOT LISTED by the pathologist in his report. When an interested party asked about this injury being unlisted by the pathologist, the coroner attempted to play it down by stating that not all injuries are always listed by pathologists if such minor injuries tie in with the cause of death, to which the interested person stated that the unlisted injury was not minor but was a significant large injury that did not appear to connect to the direct cause of death ( head injury due to being hit by a train) the coroner had no answer for this! and further concerns raised of no causation expert being consulted to establish the mechanics of how this unlisted injury could have happened, were met by the coroner
repeatedly stating that the the pathologist was an expert in causation of death which he identified as a head injury....the interested person made clear there was no disputing the cause of death, or that the pathologist is an expert in establishing the cause of death, the issue was, that only an expert specialising in the mechanics of how that large unlisted injury could have occurred would be able to establish if it tied in with the fatal injury ( if it did) and then be able to rule out foul play......oh, we may not have mentioned this before but there was also broken blue rope tied to the discarded piece of rail!
NO PICTURES, NO VIDEOS, NO AUDIO RECORDINGS, NO CCTV, Even the Taxi driver was NOT SHOWN A PICTURE of Robert Pickthall to ID him, no evidence to prove suicide apart from a email from a hacked account.
The Coroner failed to mention a woman who’d called Carlisle Security, (we assume) she was on a train passing going through Acton Bridge, that witnessed another woman with a Robert Pickthall just before his death, her statement was never chased up!
A member of the public presented an email from the Coroner stating that the “suicide” was in fact reported as a “homicide” from the very start of the investigation whilst AT THE SCENE, despite this email being sent from the coroners office so there was no disputing the information, it was ignored by the Coroner but he was quick to have it put on record hurryingly going through his diary proving he was not the Coroner that sent that email.
He also failed to take into account that Robert Pickthall emails was hacked on the day he died, and accepted without doubt the alleged email that was sent to the fake NOK from Robert Pickthall email address claiming he was leaving EVERYTHING to her. He failed to mention that Robert Pickthall clearly stated he was worried that someone had been in his house going through his files days before his death.
He also ignored that fact that the fake NOK appointed by the police was texting an associate about how she knew the exact times of when Robert Pickthall had left his house and got into the taxi and was pleading with them to keep it a secret.
He ignored the texts from the fake NOK stating that the Coroner has broken all the rules for her.
He failed to mention that the Police had not collected Robert Pickthall mobile phone and instead left it with the fake NOK until we got involved. He failed to mention that the fake NOK never contacted the family until the family contacted us.
He ignored the texts from the fake NOK stating that the police told her to take down her facebook page and not to release any information to the public.
He ignore the Text from the fake NOK stating she had filtered Robert Pickthalls money and ignored the oral evidence by a witness that the Fake NOK had told her face to face that she had filtered Robert Pickthall money from his bank account but was going to say he had gifted it to her. He ignored how the fake NOK gave three different accounts of where she was that day, the coroner also ignored fact that several persons had confirmed the fake NOK was not in fact his partner and without challenge he at all times referred to her and led the court to believe that she was in fact his partner, which enabled the lie to be further spread by the presstitutes in attendances by putting it out to the public.
After All of these texts messages and emails where shown, the Coroner unbelievably told the court he was adjourning so he could speak alone in his chambers with Paul Hughes that earlier mentioned only police officer in the room who was also a called by him as a WITNESS, this quick meeting gives speculation that the Coroner and Police were colluding. After this meeting it was clear the verdict was going to be “Suicide” but when you have a Coroner who is employed by the same Council who works closely with the police that raged war against Robert Pickthall this was ALWAYS going to be biased. The fake NOK was seen to be sat next to what looks like a police officer or a police liaison officer which also proves how biased this whole proceedings was going to be. The coroner also appeared to cherry pick parts of the text messages between Robert Pickthall and the fake NOK which made the text messages appear to be referring to suicide, had he read out the entire contents of the text massages then it would be more suggestive that the conversation between the two was not referring to suicide at all, for example how Robert Pictkthall was asked if he had ironed a clean shirt (to attend his court hearing the next day) and his response was that had bought a new shirt for the occasion. These text messages have not been released even in pre disclosed evidence, interested party’s could only view them via appointment at the coroners office, no copies were allowed to be taken, printed or photographed, however short notes were allowed to be taken. The real NOK has viewed these txt messages and confirmed the information written about them.
The fake NOK refused to take the stand just like the lead investigator Ian Henderson, which would have enabled her to be questioned. Those that did take the stand apart from the police Officer, did so because they cared and loved Robert Pickthall and wanted him have a right to defend himself from these allegations that he killed himself.
The coroner failed to read out the lies in Paul Hughs statement which stated that Robert Pickthall family were supportive of the police findings and did not support the attendance of what he calls Conspiracy theorists at the inquest, proven to be lies as his daughter supported by a family member approached us and confirmed the family’s full support of us and our investigations and agreed that the inquest appeared to be withholding evidence. Even after the inquest, due to the lack of information provided by the coroner we had to inform them of the grisly details of Robert Pickthall’s death of which they were unaware, despite it being distressing they still wanted to know.... AND THEY HAD A RIGHT TO KNOW, it is not the coroners place to make assumptions that loved ones won’t want to know the facts or details, Otis not within his jurisdiction to make such decisions!
The omitted injuries (both listed and unlisted by the pathologist) by the coroner are proven as omitted by the fact that the media whores in attendance made no mention of those facts, we even approached them outside the Court House to beg them to do real journalism in their articles about this Inquest.
Robert Pickthall was killed because the Council would not allow him to have access to a copy of the emails that he alleged to have sent that was alleged to have been abusive to council members, he was jailed twice in Strangeways without a single email being presented, even though by law this is required as standard disclosure that must be complied with..... an elderly, disabled gent, with a serious heart condition sentenced to prison without one single email being presented to prove him guilty as charged, not to mention the fact that the councils barrister was appointed illegally, his huge fees being paid for from public funds, their barrister ADAM SPEKER, 5 RB CHAMBERS himself had proven it to be illegal himself in a case that HE WON which was Sunderland Housing company & others v Baines and others 2006 for those with understanding look it up! JW have an ongoing issue with bringing this barrister to account, having filed criminal proceedings and requesting a warrant for his arrest Wirral magistrates court legal teams are refusing to progress the case into the courtroom, despite their legal team having zero grounds to challenge it, we have Passed on complaints to HMCTS CEO Susan Acland Hood who has already been assured by WMC that they would deal with the issue, that was several weeks ago, a second letter of complaint of non compliance with court rules has been sent and a couple of days ago we received confirmation that the matter is being looked into! Police refuse to prosecute the seemingly untouchable Mr SPEKER despite THEIR OWN POLICE LEGAL TEAMS BEING UNABLE TO CHALLENGE OUR ALLEGATION AND SUPPORTED DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE..... You see how deep this rabbit hole gets when you begin to look deeper, you realise just how convenient this “suicide” theory is for so many officials and trusted public servants, a “suicide” by a man on the verge of proving his innocence by gaining (after almost a decade) his long fought for backing by the ICO to prove his innocence and his set up by those trusted public servants, when put together with so many unanswered questions and lack of investigation, and an inquest headed by a coroner who presents as deliberately obtuse, is a suicide that appears more than just a bit suspicious!
Mr Pickthalls knew with complete certainty that he was almost close enough to touch his personal victory, and with it would have brought down all hells fury......Court Judges would have been sacked, Barristers sacked, Councillors sacked, police officers sacked and presstitutes sued for defamation and slander. It is no doubt that he was killed and it is a fact that a third party financially gained, I let you workout who that was because apparently im just a conspiracy theorist that ONLY PRESENTED FACTUAL EVIDENCE UNDER OATH WHICH WAS ACCEPTED BY THE COURTS AS FACTUAL EVIDENCE.
The fight that Robert Pickthall started has not finished, it has only just begun
Robert Pickthall was killed on the 30th July 2019 at Acton Bridge Railway station and body was found on the 31st of July. He was suicided for exposing corruption in Chester West and Cheshire Council which includes the police force. for more background read our recent posts or go to our webpage https://www.justicewatch.co.uk/robert-pickthall
"Chief Constable British Transport Police
Mr Paul Crowther
Dear Sir
As you are aware ,it is nearly 4 months since the death of Mr Robert Pickthall at Acton Bridge Railway Station and as you are aware, I am an interested person. You are also aware that I am on record that you have committed egregious conduct in the manner you have investigated Mr Pickthall's death, Your officers have failed to contact me despite two promises in the last 100 days, The BTP have failed to release any details on the death and I was advised some two months ago that you were REINVESTIGATING his death.
Could you please answer the specific questions
1.The root cause of Mr Pickthall's death,
2. Why have you not published his death was a straightforward suicide as your officers have intimated to me and other interested parties.You have a legal obligation to publish all suicides on the NetworkRail Premises.
3. Why did you ignore Zelda Davies as the Next of Kin.
4. Why did you not interview xxxxxxxxxx as a suspect.
5. Why did you not confiscate Mr Pickthall's Phone and Lap top from xxxxxxxxx.
Your investigation of Mr Pickthall's death is at best, tardy and at worst egregious. Your conduct on this specific case is tantamount to maladministration and I invite you to treat this letter as a formal complaint against the CC of the BTP. From your archive records it is SOP for the BTP to release the details of all suicides on Network Rail property but for some unknown reason you have chosen to remain silent and turn a wilful eye to Robert Pickthall's death.
I look forward to your response.
With thanks
Yours sincerely
Alan M Dransfield "
"Chief Constable British Transport Police
Mr Paul Crowther
Dear Sir
As you are aware ,it is nearly 4 months since the death of Mr Robert Pickthall at Acton Bridge Railway Station and as you are aware, I am an interested person. You are also aware that I am on record that you have committed egregious conduct in the manner you have investigated Mr Pickthall's death, Your officers have failed to contact me despite two promises in the last 100 days, The BTP have failed to release any details on the death and I was advised some two months ago that you were REINVESTIGATING his death.
Could you please answer the specific questions
1.The root cause of Mr Pickthall's death,
2. Why have you not published his death was a straightforward suicide as your officers have intimated to me and other interested parties.You have a legal obligation to publish all suicides on the NetworkRail Premises.
3. Why did you ignore Zelda Davies as the Next of Kin.
4. Why did you not interview xxxxxxxxxx as a suspect.
5. Why did you not confiscate Mr Pickthall's Phone and Lap top from xxxxxxxxx.
Your investigation of Mr Pickthall's death is at best, tardy and at worst egregious. Your conduct on this specific case is tantamount to maladministration and I invite you to treat this letter as a formal complaint against the CC of the BTP. From your archive records it is SOP for the BTP to release the details of all suicides on Network Rail property but for some unknown reason you have chosen to remain silent and turn a wilful eye to Robert Pickthall's death.
I look forward to your response.
With thanks
Yours sincerely
Alan M Dransfield "
The case of Robert Pickthall has once again taken a new twist.
Robert Pickthall was killed on the 30th July 2019 at Acton Bridge Railway station and body was found on the 31st of July. He was suicided for exposing corruption in Chester West and Cheshire Council which includes the police force. for more background read our recent posts or go to our webpage https://www.justicewatch.co.uk/robert-pickthall
It has come to our attention that the powers that be that are involved in this murder and cover up have made an unusual act on publishing his death in the northwich guardian death announcements in the last couple of days and changing the date it was published to make it look as if they had published it on the 26th of September ONLY 2 days after we published the date of his funereal and cremation on the 24th of September.
the secret cremation and funereal took place on the 13th of September after his body was released on the 16th of August. We at the time had been searching pretty much everyday for any news and updates AND FOUND NOTHING! thousands of people have seen our posts on Robert Pickthall and none of them pointed this article out to us.
NOW this post by the Northwich Guardian comes up 3rd on our GOOGLE SEARCHES "Robert Pickthall Death" !
Clearly they are trying to hide the fact that his death, cremation and funereal have been a secret from the public from day one...maybe they had to cover their tracks for the coroner inquest to be held in January
....its also interesting to point out that we only contacted the journalists involved in his cases recently that we plan on writing a article about them.
Robert Pickthall was killed on the 30th July 2019 at Acton Bridge Railway station and body was found on the 31st of July. He was suicided for exposing corruption in Chester West and Cheshire Council which includes the police force. for more background read our recent posts or go to our webpage https://www.justicewatch.co.uk/robert-pickthall
It has come to our attention that the powers that be that are involved in this murder and cover up have made an unusual act on publishing his death in the northwich guardian death announcements in the last couple of days and changing the date it was published to make it look as if they had published it on the 26th of September ONLY 2 days after we published the date of his funereal and cremation on the 24th of September.
the secret cremation and funereal took place on the 13th of September after his body was released on the 16th of August. We at the time had been searching pretty much everyday for any news and updates AND FOUND NOTHING! thousands of people have seen our posts on Robert Pickthall and none of them pointed this article out to us.
NOW this post by the Northwich Guardian comes up 3rd on our GOOGLE SEARCHES "Robert Pickthall Death" !
Clearly they are trying to hide the fact that his death, cremation and funereal have been a secret from the public from day one...maybe they had to cover their tracks for the coroner inquest to be held in January
....its also interesting to point out that we only contacted the journalists involved in his cases recently that we plan on writing a article about them.
It came to our attention that an “ex” police officer attempted to infiltrate Justice Watch and spy on the case of Robert Pickthall who was killed with the help of the police at Acton Bridge Railway Station in Cheshire on the 30th of July 2019. He was killed for exposing corruption within Cheshire West and Chester Council, Cheshire Police, presstitutes and the juridical system. We will call this mole Person X..... for now.
Persons X first message us on Justice Watch not about helping us or showing any interest in any of our cases but was to sell a product by Persons X, we are not interested in promoting someones product so we never reposted the article Persons X sent to us. Persons X then started an information gathering operation by trying to get us to tell Persons X how we know so much about the killing of Robert Pickthall in Cheshire ....oh yes in case I forget Person X now lives in CHESHIRE but thats just a coincidence right?
“Hello, Quick one, Robert Pickthall, can you tell me everything and what evidence you have please? I'm going to see if I can pitch this as a possible documentary”
“I'm working on some documentary ideas and if this is what it seems like it would be great and hopefully get the right justice”
“How do you know all of this? What evidence do you have?”
You have to understand our facebook time line at that time and still is full of information and articles about Robert Pickthall, I even gave Persons X my mobile number to call me. Persons X went silent for 38 days. Persons X never commented or shared, liked any of our posts regarding Robert Pickthall despite wanting to make a documentary on it. I messaged Persons X 6 times to no reply but that is the police for you “silence is golden”, instead 38 days later Persons X comments on a post on our wall defending police officers using their lights and sirens to get their breakfast at MacDonald's, maybe Persons X forgot that Persons X wasn't meant to be in Bullshire. It was safe for Person X to comment on something trivial but too scared to put her face on the murder case of Robert Pickthall....despite wanting to make a documentary on it. We at Justice Watch dont get star struck by “whistleblowers” or attractive to offers like documentaries being done on us, being an “ex” police officer dosnt impress us.
Person x had 41 days to contact us, share, like or comment on the Robert Pickthall case since the Admin on their posted it. one of only 2 posts despite almost an artical ever week posted by us on Justice Watch regarding the case....so much for being an "ally"
Person X had 38 days to respond from the last time we message her back but was more interested in commenting on a post defending the police at a MacDonalds car park, Person X then attacked one of our admins calling her a “silly lady” and “Jane Bloggs” on the post plus calling her “nasty spiteful person, who takes it upon herself to abuse people” . Person X was trying to either find out who was admin and or try to discredit an admin “is it you who runs and founded this site?”. Person Ex then attempts once again to try and discredit the page stating “isn't someone who should be running a " justice " page. Clearly have your own issues you should deal with. I feel sorry for you.”...so much for a caring and compassionate person who had to suffer for 14 years of “abuse” before being retired.
Person X then went crying victim to another admin on another page that claims to be exposing corruption but seem to be vomiting out on their wall what the public are forced fed by the prostitutes and media whores....the same ones that promoted his case but whatever. Person X product by the way was promoted by the presstitute Sun newspaper of all papers. Justice Watch has always been about investigating real stories and exposing real corruption that is not filtered by the state controlled presstitutes and would NEVER get into bed with any newspaper.
Persons X claims to have QUIT the police force due to bullying and seeing corruption, Persons X left the force with a nice pension and cheque which seems to be a medical retirement.....AFTER 14 years of turning a blind eye to all the bullying and corruption....14 years! But will be compensated for any loss with a compensation claim against the police....see how it works?
Persons X seems to have contacted this other Facebook page 5 weeks before Robert Pickthall was killed despite the other admin on that page claiming he had known Persons X for a long time
“GOOD friend, xxxxx is not a mole at all”
The admin in a conversation tstarted to call me names and what some would call “gas lighting” but I don't like crying victim so lets leave that aside but this is another well known tactic by the police to try and out cast someone from a group. He called me and the other admin on the page the following:
to me
“you are in cukoo land”
“paranoid sctzo”
“you are so misguided, you really are.”
“levels or paranoia that is out there”
“you are to paranoid to achieve anything.”
“you on drugs!”
to the other admin
“obnoxious woman “
“She is delusional”
“ losing credibility”
“XXXXX Thinks the world revolves around her, like she is the most important case around.”
This is all coming from a man that accused me of being a police informant and unfriended me because I had someone on my friends list, who I had no idea who he was never spoke to him. I never said a word about it, even when he re friended me to talk about a friend who we both know who was inprisoned, which he now dosnt really seem to care about her now even when mentioning she could be suicidal but whatever.
He unfriended the other admin on Justice Watch because of Person X and told me he had to “gonna cut you loose on this chat, we seem to have a conflict of interest.”
I guess he can't be friends with me because one of our admins called out his “friend” who he only been in contact with 5 weeks before Robert Pickthall was killed on the 30th of July 2019. But this is another tactic used by police undercovers and informants they hijack groups and pages and then get everyone to unfriend them calling them racist or fascist similar to what happened to me when the leader of Antifa in Liverpool and Manchester, member of Unite Union group and a community football group in Liverpool.....who by the way could be related to a police officer in Cheisre Police but thats for another article. He got everyone to unfriend me, feared of being outcasted by the group so group members are forced to comply or be painted by the same brush as he is trying to paint me. So they all unfriended me like cowards and then comes in cognitive dissonance.... so no one is allowed to question or think for themselves within the group...follow the leader.
The idea that we need to unite and be “allies” came up in the messages between me and him which once again is another police tactic. When one of their own is called out and their cover is blown this comes up to try and damper the fire down alluding to the idea that the person is attacking the group rather then calling out an undercover, a simple case of identity politics.
“Yep, that is the consensus and I was hoping I was wrong. We need solidarity amongst ourselves (like police have), without that, we are fucked.”
he thinks he knows how the game is played because he won one civil case against the police, no one went to jail, no one was sacked it was just a payout. He seems to think cases are run on merit rather then cherry picked and bargained with by the freemasons that run the judicial system, but we where all naive at the start, we all have to learn. His story was also presstituted out by the main stream media whores......but would they report anything on case of Robert Pickthall....NOPE!
The conversation started between me and him because one of our admins on Justice Watch was defending herself on his page from what appearer to be a discrediting operation against the Justice Watch admin by Person X, which is what police undercovers do all the time to groups online.
“I am having a bit of a heated debate with xxxx about this and that. What do you know of her. She is insulting one of my moderators, xxxxxx who is ex-police and a real valuable asset. She is really burning bridges and I hate to lose allies but she is losing credibility.”
I'm not saying he is thinking for himself...well....not all of it. I would assume most of the responses came from Persons X mouth, manipulating him into Persons X way of thinking. At times he has shown himself to be naïve especially about how solicitors really work, but like we said we wont hold that against him.
He then admits to having a police officer as a friend on the force and start to make apologise for his friend turning a blind eye to the corruption and crimes committed by his colleagues...similar Person X wonder if hes gonna get a pension too.
“My best mate is a cop, still serving and he is 100% to be trusted and 100% sees corruption but has fuck all power to do anything. he has to sit down, keep his head down and only that way will he get his pension. He is targeted all day long but what can hoe do!”
Following the conversation he quoted Person X and this is where we spotted an obvious lie
"I said I'll take a look. Then following our disagreement on the justice watch page I decided she wasn't a person I would ever like to work with so didn't pursue it. "
Person X at no time said would take a look at the Robert Pickthall case, Person X stated was looking at making a documentary, a documentary about a subject that she claims she dose not know about and shown no interest. I guess Person X lives a busy life.
This “ex” cop isnt even using real name to date, a self confessed actor, partner who is a copper.......do I really need to go on LOL....it took her 14 years of abuse to throw in the towel or is something else at play here?
There is more we can divulge but.....the situation is sensitive
This is what police assets do, they take over groups then dictate the narrative. They get rid of anyone who has enough balls to think for themselves and form their own opinion......its the old tactic of controlled opposition which we have covered in great details in our past articles regarding Tommy Robinson and the Antifa clown show. This little “ex” piggie went wee wee back home because we caught Person X out before Person X could get any info on us regarding the killing of Robert Pickthall.
WHOS NEXT?
Persons X first message us on Justice Watch not about helping us or showing any interest in any of our cases but was to sell a product by Persons X, we are not interested in promoting someones product so we never reposted the article Persons X sent to us. Persons X then started an information gathering operation by trying to get us to tell Persons X how we know so much about the killing of Robert Pickthall in Cheshire ....oh yes in case I forget Person X now lives in CHESHIRE but thats just a coincidence right?
“Hello, Quick one, Robert Pickthall, can you tell me everything and what evidence you have please? I'm going to see if I can pitch this as a possible documentary”
“I'm working on some documentary ideas and if this is what it seems like it would be great and hopefully get the right justice”
“How do you know all of this? What evidence do you have?”
You have to understand our facebook time line at that time and still is full of information and articles about Robert Pickthall, I even gave Persons X my mobile number to call me. Persons X went silent for 38 days. Persons X never commented or shared, liked any of our posts regarding Robert Pickthall despite wanting to make a documentary on it. I messaged Persons X 6 times to no reply but that is the police for you “silence is golden”, instead 38 days later Persons X comments on a post on our wall defending police officers using their lights and sirens to get their breakfast at MacDonald's, maybe Persons X forgot that Persons X wasn't meant to be in Bullshire. It was safe for Person X to comment on something trivial but too scared to put her face on the murder case of Robert Pickthall....despite wanting to make a documentary on it. We at Justice Watch dont get star struck by “whistleblowers” or attractive to offers like documentaries being done on us, being an “ex” police officer dosnt impress us.
Person x had 41 days to contact us, share, like or comment on the Robert Pickthall case since the Admin on their posted it. one of only 2 posts despite almost an artical ever week posted by us on Justice Watch regarding the case....so much for being an "ally"
Person X had 38 days to respond from the last time we message her back but was more interested in commenting on a post defending the police at a MacDonalds car park, Person X then attacked one of our admins calling her a “silly lady” and “Jane Bloggs” on the post plus calling her “nasty spiteful person, who takes it upon herself to abuse people” . Person X was trying to either find out who was admin and or try to discredit an admin “is it you who runs and founded this site?”. Person Ex then attempts once again to try and discredit the page stating “isn't someone who should be running a " justice " page. Clearly have your own issues you should deal with. I feel sorry for you.”...so much for a caring and compassionate person who had to suffer for 14 years of “abuse” before being retired.
Person X then went crying victim to another admin on another page that claims to be exposing corruption but seem to be vomiting out on their wall what the public are forced fed by the prostitutes and media whores....the same ones that promoted his case but whatever. Person X product by the way was promoted by the presstitute Sun newspaper of all papers. Justice Watch has always been about investigating real stories and exposing real corruption that is not filtered by the state controlled presstitutes and would NEVER get into bed with any newspaper.
Persons X claims to have QUIT the police force due to bullying and seeing corruption, Persons X left the force with a nice pension and cheque which seems to be a medical retirement.....AFTER 14 years of turning a blind eye to all the bullying and corruption....14 years! But will be compensated for any loss with a compensation claim against the police....see how it works?
Persons X seems to have contacted this other Facebook page 5 weeks before Robert Pickthall was killed despite the other admin on that page claiming he had known Persons X for a long time
“GOOD friend, xxxxx is not a mole at all”
The admin in a conversation tstarted to call me names and what some would call “gas lighting” but I don't like crying victim so lets leave that aside but this is another well known tactic by the police to try and out cast someone from a group. He called me and the other admin on the page the following:
to me
“you are in cukoo land”
“paranoid sctzo”
“you are so misguided, you really are.”
“levels or paranoia that is out there”
“you are to paranoid to achieve anything.”
“you on drugs!”
to the other admin
“obnoxious woman “
“She is delusional”
“ losing credibility”
“XXXXX Thinks the world revolves around her, like she is the most important case around.”
This is all coming from a man that accused me of being a police informant and unfriended me because I had someone on my friends list, who I had no idea who he was never spoke to him. I never said a word about it, even when he re friended me to talk about a friend who we both know who was inprisoned, which he now dosnt really seem to care about her now even when mentioning she could be suicidal but whatever.
He unfriended the other admin on Justice Watch because of Person X and told me he had to “gonna cut you loose on this chat, we seem to have a conflict of interest.”
I guess he can't be friends with me because one of our admins called out his “friend” who he only been in contact with 5 weeks before Robert Pickthall was killed on the 30th of July 2019. But this is another tactic used by police undercovers and informants they hijack groups and pages and then get everyone to unfriend them calling them racist or fascist similar to what happened to me when the leader of Antifa in Liverpool and Manchester, member of Unite Union group and a community football group in Liverpool.....who by the way could be related to a police officer in Cheisre Police but thats for another article. He got everyone to unfriend me, feared of being outcasted by the group so group members are forced to comply or be painted by the same brush as he is trying to paint me. So they all unfriended me like cowards and then comes in cognitive dissonance.... so no one is allowed to question or think for themselves within the group...follow the leader.
The idea that we need to unite and be “allies” came up in the messages between me and him which once again is another police tactic. When one of their own is called out and their cover is blown this comes up to try and damper the fire down alluding to the idea that the person is attacking the group rather then calling out an undercover, a simple case of identity politics.
“Yep, that is the consensus and I was hoping I was wrong. We need solidarity amongst ourselves (like police have), without that, we are fucked.”
he thinks he knows how the game is played because he won one civil case against the police, no one went to jail, no one was sacked it was just a payout. He seems to think cases are run on merit rather then cherry picked and bargained with by the freemasons that run the judicial system, but we where all naive at the start, we all have to learn. His story was also presstituted out by the main stream media whores......but would they report anything on case of Robert Pickthall....NOPE!
The conversation started between me and him because one of our admins on Justice Watch was defending herself on his page from what appearer to be a discrediting operation against the Justice Watch admin by Person X, which is what police undercovers do all the time to groups online.
“I am having a bit of a heated debate with xxxx about this and that. What do you know of her. She is insulting one of my moderators, xxxxxx who is ex-police and a real valuable asset. She is really burning bridges and I hate to lose allies but she is losing credibility.”
I'm not saying he is thinking for himself...well....not all of it. I would assume most of the responses came from Persons X mouth, manipulating him into Persons X way of thinking. At times he has shown himself to be naïve especially about how solicitors really work, but like we said we wont hold that against him.
He then admits to having a police officer as a friend on the force and start to make apologise for his friend turning a blind eye to the corruption and crimes committed by his colleagues...similar Person X wonder if hes gonna get a pension too.
“My best mate is a cop, still serving and he is 100% to be trusted and 100% sees corruption but has fuck all power to do anything. he has to sit down, keep his head down and only that way will he get his pension. He is targeted all day long but what can hoe do!”
Following the conversation he quoted Person X and this is where we spotted an obvious lie
"I said I'll take a look. Then following our disagreement on the justice watch page I decided she wasn't a person I would ever like to work with so didn't pursue it. "
Person X at no time said would take a look at the Robert Pickthall case, Person X stated was looking at making a documentary, a documentary about a subject that she claims she dose not know about and shown no interest. I guess Person X lives a busy life.
This “ex” cop isnt even using real name to date, a self confessed actor, partner who is a copper.......do I really need to go on LOL....it took her 14 years of abuse to throw in the towel or is something else at play here?
There is more we can divulge but.....the situation is sensitive
This is what police assets do, they take over groups then dictate the narrative. They get rid of anyone who has enough balls to think for themselves and form their own opinion......its the old tactic of controlled opposition which we have covered in great details in our past articles regarding Tommy Robinson and the Antifa clown show. This little “ex” piggie went wee wee back home because we caught Person X out before Person X could get any info on us regarding the killing of Robert Pickthall.
WHOS NEXT?
GREAT NEWS!!!!
After Cheshire and West Council and Cheshire Police detained Professor Paul Trummel on the 10th October at Countess of Chester Hospital under DOLS (Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards), Justice Watch went to the hospital and was able to get him out of the hospital and safe in his apartment for him to take the next flight to America the next morning.
On the 15th October Cheshire Police conducted a search for him in order to once again detain him under DOLS, unlucky for them he was safe in America. They searched his apartment and contacted the NOK. We did not have contact with Paul until today, his flight was delayed so he couldn't contact us.
Now Paul can continue his work and start writing the article about the murder of Robert Pickthall where he will name names of the the Killers and co conspirators. His website is http://contracabal.info/ STAY TUNED!
After Cheshire and West Council and Cheshire Police detained Professor Paul Trummel on the 10th October at Countess of Chester Hospital under DOLS (Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards), Justice Watch went to the hospital and was able to get him out of the hospital and safe in his apartment for him to take the next flight to America the next morning.
On the 15th October Cheshire Police conducted a search for him in order to once again detain him under DOLS, unlucky for them he was safe in America. They searched his apartment and contacted the NOK. We did not have contact with Paul until today, his flight was delayed so he couldn't contact us.
Now Paul can continue his work and start writing the article about the murder of Robert Pickthall where he will name names of the the Killers and co conspirators. His website is http://contracabal.info/ STAY TUNED!
A professor Paul Trummel is of sound mind is being held against his will by Countess of Chester Hospital via DoLS, 3 days before he is scheduled to fly to America and publish an article about Robert Pickthall murder.
After a Prepublication Notice being made to the fake NOK on the 4th October.New Paragraph
After a Prepublication Notice being made to the fake NOK on the 4th October.New Paragraph
It has come to our attention that at the time of Robert Pickthall death an allegation of Homicide was recorded. Considering that his body was found at Acton Bridge Railway station midnight it is unlikely to have been a member of the public.
Maybe it was a police officer or maybe a paramedic?
"The Coroner has already informed the police of the allegation of ‘homicide’. The Police had also received notification of the allegation directly at the time of Mr Pickthall’s death. "
Why has the Coroner allowed a secret cremation of Robert Pickthall, destroying vital evidence.
Why Is T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson 4272 from BTP refusing to investigate murder after multiple claims now by the public including his NOK that Robert Pickthall was murdered. Why is he refusing to investigate fraud especially now we have found out the fake NOK gave a false address to the police?
Why was it reported in the media that the alleged body and incident of Robert Pickthall that "Police have said the death is not being treated as suspicious."
British Transport Police, 2nd floor Rail House, Lord Nelson St, Liverpool Office
Direct: 0151 255 4509
Mobile: 07586547356
Email: ian.henderson@btp.pnn.police.ukph
Maybe it was a police officer or maybe a paramedic?
"The Coroner has already informed the police of the allegation of ‘homicide’. The Police had also received notification of the allegation directly at the time of Mr Pickthall’s death. "
Why has the Coroner allowed a secret cremation of Robert Pickthall, destroying vital evidence.
Why Is T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson 4272 from BTP refusing to investigate murder after multiple claims now by the public including his NOK that Robert Pickthall was murdered. Why is he refusing to investigate fraud especially now we have found out the fake NOK gave a false address to the police?
Why was it reported in the media that the alleged body and incident of Robert Pickthall that "Police have said the death is not being treated as suspicious."
British Transport Police, 2nd floor Rail House, Lord Nelson St, Liverpool Office
Direct: 0151 255 4509
Mobile: 07586547356
Email: ian.henderson@btp.pnn.police.ukph
After contacting the Coroner, over 20 police officers, 3 police forces and their chief constables and commissioners plus the IOPC they have ALL refused to investigate this murder.
After contact the CPS, Senior Fraud Office and the Bar Standards Board ALL have refused to investigate this murder.
After contacting the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Rail Ombudsman and National Rail ALL have refused to investigate this Murder
After contacting Cheshire West and Chester Council including the registry office ALL refused to investigate this murder.
below is a letter sent to the Cheif Coroner, Judicial Conduct Investigations Office and the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman...will they too refuse to investigate this MURDER
why are ALL the presstitutes and media whores SILENT!
“ I write to inform you and make complaints of gross maladministration, obfuscation and machination by Chester Coroner Mr Alan Moore and Wirral Magistrates Courts Legal Duty Team who refuse to identify themselves to me.
Let me begin with coroner Alan Moore and the gross maladministration issues which have brought about a a conflict of interests in the coroners investigation into the death of one Mr Robert Arthur Pickthall whose body was found somewhere within the grounds of Acton Bridge train station in the early hours of 30th July 2019.
Basic Background of this case:
Mr Pickthall was a pro active freedom of information campaigner and had a long running, ongoing case with his local council Cheshire West and Chester Council (CWaCC), who had in 2015 obtained INTERIM injunctive relief under the Harassment Act 1997, it transpires that this was obtained fraudulently, with the legal representation of the council being funded at the tax payers expense when they knew they were not entitled to such funding, it was also obtained by an abuse of process by their appointed barrister.
Mr Pickthall had at all times over a period of seven years been refused basic disclosure of the evidence on which CWaCC had relied upon to obtain the said interim injunctive relief which had been obtained under Civil Procedure rules, having already failed to obtain the same under criminal procedure rules due to the fact that after a five month investigation by police they were unable to produce any of the evidence on which CWaCC would be reliant on if the case were to progress to a criminal court.
Mr Pickthall had been sent to prison twice for breaching the order, however, the ICO though reluctant in the past to enforce Mr Pickthall's rights in having CWaCC comply with standard disclosure, had decided to back him in his pursuit of the evidence on which CWaCC had at all times claimed to have but had at all times also refused to disclose.
Having been informed of the ICO decision CWaCC sought yet another committal hearing before Mr Pickthall was able to issue proceedings against them to force them to comply with their obligations under the rules of disclosure.
Mr Pickthall was due in court for those committal proceedings on the day of his death.
Facts Relating to Gross Misconduct by the coroner:
On the surface of things it would appear to almost everyone that Mr Pickthall's death was a straightforward case of suicide; That he'd taken a taxi from his home at approximately 9.50pm on the night of his death to Acton Bridge station where he had walked onto the tracks/ jumped in front of a train and was instantly killed. Police had visited his house at approximately 6am that morning and the front door was opened by a woman who informed them that she was Mr Pickthall's partner and next of kin. From that moment on she did liaise directly with the coroner and his staff and was privy to all updates and information from the coroner.
Upon discovering the death of Mr Pickthall, who was a very dear friend of mine I was to say the least, most shocked and distressed as I know that he would never have committed suicide, and most definitely not in such a manner that had been stated. Though I had not been in touch with Mr Pickthall for the past two years I knew that he would not have a partner. I made enquiries which confirmed my suspicions!
After reading the Coroners and Justice act 2009 (and amended) I now know that it is the coroner who is responsible for identifying the next of kin, I did not know this to begin with, I and others were led a merry dance by the police, BTP and the coroners office who kept "bouncing the ball back into each others court" as it were by all claiming it was not them that were responsible for investigating the case, indeed, the case appears to be shrouded in a cloak of secrecy. I understand that the coroner delegates tasks such as identifying the next of kin to his team or in this case probably officers from BTP, but ultimately it is his responsibility to ensure he is liaising with the right and most appropriate person.
It would appear that no checks were done in relation to the identification of Mr Pickthall's next of kin; because the woman opened the door to officers at Mr Pickthall's home address, informed them that she was his partner, that he had no relatives in this country nor any close friends and that she was his next of kin, the officers simply took her at her word! The "witnesses" identified for the purpose of the coroners investigation were all directed to the coroner by xxxxxxxxx! These are the only witnesses that appear to have been contacted!
After making enquiries myself and speaking with other close friends of Mr Pickthall's, who spoke to him on a daily basis It soon became apparent that this was not a straightforward suicide!
Below are the findings of facts by myself and others; Findings which have been passed on to the coroner via emails from at least four persons, yet have been completely ignored and disregarded by the coroner...
XXXXXX knowingly lied to the officers who attended Mr Pickthall's house on the morning of his death, several people are willing to testify in court that xxxxxxxxx was not and never had been Mr Pickthall's partner and had specifically been told this by Mr Pickthall himself, it is an established fact that xxxxxxx only started to refer to herself as such AFTER his death! xxxxxxxx did not live with Mr Pickthall yet she gave police her address as being that of Mr Pickthall's!
Mr Pickthall had numerous blood kin within the area that he lived, though he had been estranged from them for many years.It was only through the intervention of myself via social media that they became aware of his death and contacted me, if they had not done so they would to this day still be unaware of his death as months after his supposed date of death there has been no public announcement and his death has still not been registered, a criminal offence and promotion of identity theft which I have reported to Merseyside police, these issues are indeed most alarming!
xxxxxx has given differing accounts to different people of her whereabouts and actions in the final few hours of Mr Pickthall's life, telling people she was at his home that evening and telling other people that she was not!
Mr Pickthall was not a depressive, he was of completely sound mind. Less than one hour before Mr Pickthall supposedly left his house to throw himself under a train, he was on the telephone to his close friend Mr Alan Dransfield, they were laughing and having banter! Mr Dransfield was the last known person to speak with Mr Pickthall yet he has not been contacted and upon calling the coroners office recently I have been informed that all investigations are complete apart from the paperwork...What kind of investigation is this?
Mr Pickthall had been anticipating being sent to prison again, and had undertaken forward planning for while he was incarcerated, he had emailed a letter of authority for Mr Dransfield to act as his agent in all matters on his behalf with the exception of his finances and medical records....he already had an agent for those purposes, being myself as his personally appointed official next of kin! There appear to be suicide letters indicating that Mr Pickthall intended to kill himself, upon further examination of these letters of which I have obtained copies there appear to be issues which suggest that they are fake, i must point out that they were also typed and unsigned by Mr Pickthall!
On the very day of Mr Pickthall's death, XXXXXXX visited his solicitors (Cobbleys in Liverpool) after obtaining the information of who is solicitor was from xxxxxxx! I do not know if at that time xxxxxxxxx had obtained the death certificate from the coroner!
xxxxxxxx was unbelievably allowed to keep Mr Pickthall's mobile phone which may have held vital evidence, she was allowed free access to his home and all his belongings, free access to cover or dispose of any incriminating evidence of foul play.
Mr Pickthall was a retired gentleman, in his working days he had been a successful businessman, he had substantial savings. I asked one of his close friends about this when discussing issues of a funeral, she informed me that xxxxxx had told her his money was all " filtered" and was all gone, I asked XXXXXX to ask her where it had gone; When XXXXXX next spoke with xxxxxx she pushed the subject and was told by xxxxxx that Mr Pickthall had "GIFTED" her all his money, this is absurd, Mr Pickthall would never do such a thing without giving her a written statement to substantiate her claim in order to ensure the finger of suspicion were not pointed at her, leaving her wide open to allegations of theft/fraud!
Everyone who knew Mr Pickthall personally will confirm that he was extremely organised, this can be demonstrated by the letters of authority he did for Mr Dransfield and myself.
Xxxxxxx has a realistic motive for murder, being substantial financial gain, however, she is not the only one with a motive to murder Mr Pickthall!
I am a realist, these are not far fetched, ridiculous claims I am making, they are completely plausible, and the more facts that come to light, the more credible they become.
Mr Pickthall had lived and breathed to clear his name that had been dragged through the mud by CWaCC, he'd fought his corner for years, for the first time, with the backing of the ICO his victory was within reach, he wanted this more than anything he'd ever wanted in his life, only a fool would believe he would kill himself when he was so near to his goal,I trust those reading this are not fools!
If Mr Pickthall had lived there would have been a major scandal in Northwich which would have grabbed headline news, there would have been clear cases of maleficence in public office and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and many other charges for CWaCC officials to answer to, inevitably there would have been prison sentences handed out and huge amounts of compensation to pay to Mr Pickthall, not least the High flying well known London barrister who represented CWaCC would also be facing charges of serious fraud, which I shall come back to shortly...
The coroner was informed of all the above information shortly after Mr Pickthall's death. I and others informed him via his assistant Ms Kimberly Douglas and via many emails, that xxxxxx was an impostor, and that I had a handwritten authority signed and dated by Mr Pickthall stating that I WAS his official next of kin and authorising me to make all decisions on his behalf, there were no restrictions on that authority.... (When considering how Mr Pickthall conducted his affairs, going to the trouble of doing two letters of authority, on the balance of probability, isn't it more likely than not, that he would have ensured a letter was written for XXXXXXX if he'd "GIFTED" her his money before committing suicide?)
There is no disputing the authority given me as the letter was handwritten from Strangeways prison on their letter headed writing paper. The coroner requested I email him a copy which I did, yet still he continued to treat xxxxxx as next of kin stating I would be treated as an interested person and kept updated on progress in the case. Surely my letter of authority naming me as NOK and appointing me to make all decisions on his behalf trumped xxxxxxx nothing! Of course to admit this would be an admittance by the coroner that he had made a catastrophic mistake, as he had been at all times liaising with a potential prime suspect in a murder, this beggars belief and is a huge matter of public concern. This is what has caused the conflict of interests in this case!
I emailed the coroner a list of perfectly reasonable questions of which he has refused to answer even one! I have no doubt that you surely know, that In British law there is no automatic right to next of kin, and that this is not automatically given to blood relatives, but to who the coroner decides it should be when taking all the circumstances into consideration, I was asking too many awkward questions, I had identified serious maladministration in a possible murder case, is it any wonder the coroner believes it to be in his own interests to refuse to liaise with me?.
Eventually xxxxxx was in fact stripped of her role as next of kin (proving the maladministration) when xxxxxx came forward after speaking to me, she declined to be next of kin and his xxxxx took on the role, however given that she was completely against xxxxxxx due to her having all Mr Pickthall's money it would appear she may have been "bought off " as it were, as she handed next of kin responsibilities informally back to xxxxxxx who then gave CWaCC authority to dispose of Mr Pickthall's body by cremation which was completely against his wishes as everyone knew he never wanted to be cremated when he died! The coroner also knew this as I had informed him in one of my emails to him!
The coroner has also lied to me. I and other close friends of Mr Pickthall were never informed that his body had been released, despite still making enquiries to the coroners office about what was happening, his body was released on 16th August 2019 and lay in situ for twenty seven days before being cremated without our knowledge on Friday the 13th September (very apt)
The pain I feel at being denied my final farewell or to pay my last respects to my dear friend is second to none. As an interested person I was never contacted once, how dare the coroner deny me and others the right to say goodbye, is it not enough that my friend is dead, and in such dubious circumstances that such additional unnecessary heartache should be further added?
It is also my understanding that no one visually identified Mr Pickthall's body, I was thoroughly prepared to do this...What didn't the coroner want me to see?
As stated Mr Pickthall supposedly died on 30th July 2019 having been struck by the Liverpool to Euston Flyer which is impossible as the timeline of events does not tally, Mr Dransfield contacted BTP and the coroner to inform them of this, he laid out the times and proved that it was impossible. This was also ignored by the coroner and BTP. We contacted the rail company who on two separate occasions we were told by two different people that there were NO FATALITIES recorded anywhere for that night nor for the nights preceding or superseding that night.
There was no disruption to services; when a train strikes a person, the train must be isolated into a depot for thorough inspection which takes roughly three hours, nothing was recorded, we have these telephone conversations confirming no fatalities, we also have this confirmed in writing! Again the coroner and BTP have shown no interest.
The above is not an exhaustive list of concerns, but the last I must mention here is the following which I only recently discovered:
On the day Mr Pickthall met his untimely death he sent an email to xxxxxxx telling her that his emails had been hacked, all his correspondence, private messages in relation to his court appearances, the ICO, Judicial reviews, solicitors, everything going back a whole year had been deleted and wiped clear from his trash mail, he also states that it looked like someone had been cleaning his house...two days later he is dead!
He had also spoken on earlier dates to xxxxxxr about his suspicion that someone had been entering his house when he was not home! THIS SURELY CANNOT BE IGNORED! This information has now also been forwarded to the coroner, though it is doubtful given his track record on this case that it will cause him any concern!
It would appear that the obvious failings in this case by the coroner, are to protect himself due to that massive maladministration issue of NOK, it is clear that to investigate thoroughly is not in the best interests of the coroner, it is in his interest to have the matter swept under the carpet despite it being at the expense of my dead friend
As stated Mr Pickthall died on 30th July yet there has no no press release, nowhere in the public domain can his death be found, it is also confirmed by Chester Registrar Office that his death has not been registered, the coroner has according to the crematorium issued a death certificate in order to have him cremated but over two months have passed and still no register of his death.
Clearly there are highly suspicious circumstances and too many unanswered questions, besides crucial witnesses that have never been contacted, which demonstrates that this case warrants a criminal investigation by another out of area coroner and another branch of BTP as all have failed in even their basic responsibilities!
In matters relating to Wirral Magistrates Court:
This case is directly linked to the above as the barrister involved should also be considered as a suspect in the above case having so much to lose if Mr Pickthall had lived.
Despite taking my evidence of the fraud committed by both CWaCC and Mr Speker to Northwich police station and having their legal team examine it over a four day period Northwich police refuse to bring charges even though their legal team were unable to challenge the validity of the evidence. I have been forced to lay an information myself at Wirral Magistrates Court, it has been over a month now and despite me repeatedly emailing the court legal duty team to progress the matter they are ignoring me, it would appear that certain individuals are being put above the law! The barrister involved (Mr Speker) in committing hundreds of thousands of pounds worth of fraud from the public purse would also be likely to be viewing the inside of a prison cell for a long time, had Mr Pickthall lived!
If this email does not fall into the remit of those to whom i have sent it please advise on who's remit it does fall into as it appears to be the case so far that no governing body is prepared to accept responsibility for taking action.
Regards
Ms Zelda Davies"
After contact the CPS, Senior Fraud Office and the Bar Standards Board ALL have refused to investigate this murder.
After contacting the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Rail Ombudsman and National Rail ALL have refused to investigate this Murder
After contacting Cheshire West and Chester Council including the registry office ALL refused to investigate this murder.
below is a letter sent to the Cheif Coroner, Judicial Conduct Investigations Office and the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman...will they too refuse to investigate this MURDER
why are ALL the presstitutes and media whores SILENT!
“ I write to inform you and make complaints of gross maladministration, obfuscation and machination by Chester Coroner Mr Alan Moore and Wirral Magistrates Courts Legal Duty Team who refuse to identify themselves to me.
Let me begin with coroner Alan Moore and the gross maladministration issues which have brought about a a conflict of interests in the coroners investigation into the death of one Mr Robert Arthur Pickthall whose body was found somewhere within the grounds of Acton Bridge train station in the early hours of 30th July 2019.
Basic Background of this case:
Mr Pickthall was a pro active freedom of information campaigner and had a long running, ongoing case with his local council Cheshire West and Chester Council (CWaCC), who had in 2015 obtained INTERIM injunctive relief under the Harassment Act 1997, it transpires that this was obtained fraudulently, with the legal representation of the council being funded at the tax payers expense when they knew they were not entitled to such funding, it was also obtained by an abuse of process by their appointed barrister.
Mr Pickthall had at all times over a period of seven years been refused basic disclosure of the evidence on which CWaCC had relied upon to obtain the said interim injunctive relief which had been obtained under Civil Procedure rules, having already failed to obtain the same under criminal procedure rules due to the fact that after a five month investigation by police they were unable to produce any of the evidence on which CWaCC would be reliant on if the case were to progress to a criminal court.
Mr Pickthall had been sent to prison twice for breaching the order, however, the ICO though reluctant in the past to enforce Mr Pickthall's rights in having CWaCC comply with standard disclosure, had decided to back him in his pursuit of the evidence on which CWaCC had at all times claimed to have but had at all times also refused to disclose.
Having been informed of the ICO decision CWaCC sought yet another committal hearing before Mr Pickthall was able to issue proceedings against them to force them to comply with their obligations under the rules of disclosure.
Mr Pickthall was due in court for those committal proceedings on the day of his death.
Facts Relating to Gross Misconduct by the coroner:
On the surface of things it would appear to almost everyone that Mr Pickthall's death was a straightforward case of suicide; That he'd taken a taxi from his home at approximately 9.50pm on the night of his death to Acton Bridge station where he had walked onto the tracks/ jumped in front of a train and was instantly killed. Police had visited his house at approximately 6am that morning and the front door was opened by a woman who informed them that she was Mr Pickthall's partner and next of kin. From that moment on she did liaise directly with the coroner and his staff and was privy to all updates and information from the coroner.
Upon discovering the death of Mr Pickthall, who was a very dear friend of mine I was to say the least, most shocked and distressed as I know that he would never have committed suicide, and most definitely not in such a manner that had been stated. Though I had not been in touch with Mr Pickthall for the past two years I knew that he would not have a partner. I made enquiries which confirmed my suspicions!
After reading the Coroners and Justice act 2009 (and amended) I now know that it is the coroner who is responsible for identifying the next of kin, I did not know this to begin with, I and others were led a merry dance by the police, BTP and the coroners office who kept "bouncing the ball back into each others court" as it were by all claiming it was not them that were responsible for investigating the case, indeed, the case appears to be shrouded in a cloak of secrecy. I understand that the coroner delegates tasks such as identifying the next of kin to his team or in this case probably officers from BTP, but ultimately it is his responsibility to ensure he is liaising with the right and most appropriate person.
It would appear that no checks were done in relation to the identification of Mr Pickthall's next of kin; because the woman opened the door to officers at Mr Pickthall's home address, informed them that she was his partner, that he had no relatives in this country nor any close friends and that she was his next of kin, the officers simply took her at her word! The "witnesses" identified for the purpose of the coroners investigation were all directed to the coroner by xxxxxxxxx! These are the only witnesses that appear to have been contacted!
After making enquiries myself and speaking with other close friends of Mr Pickthall's, who spoke to him on a daily basis It soon became apparent that this was not a straightforward suicide!
Below are the findings of facts by myself and others; Findings which have been passed on to the coroner via emails from at least four persons, yet have been completely ignored and disregarded by the coroner...
XXXXXX knowingly lied to the officers who attended Mr Pickthall's house on the morning of his death, several people are willing to testify in court that xxxxxxxxx was not and never had been Mr Pickthall's partner and had specifically been told this by Mr Pickthall himself, it is an established fact that xxxxxxx only started to refer to herself as such AFTER his death! xxxxxxxx did not live with Mr Pickthall yet she gave police her address as being that of Mr Pickthall's!
Mr Pickthall had numerous blood kin within the area that he lived, though he had been estranged from them for many years.It was only through the intervention of myself via social media that they became aware of his death and contacted me, if they had not done so they would to this day still be unaware of his death as months after his supposed date of death there has been no public announcement and his death has still not been registered, a criminal offence and promotion of identity theft which I have reported to Merseyside police, these issues are indeed most alarming!
xxxxxx has given differing accounts to different people of her whereabouts and actions in the final few hours of Mr Pickthall's life, telling people she was at his home that evening and telling other people that she was not!
Mr Pickthall was not a depressive, he was of completely sound mind. Less than one hour before Mr Pickthall supposedly left his house to throw himself under a train, he was on the telephone to his close friend Mr Alan Dransfield, they were laughing and having banter! Mr Dransfield was the last known person to speak with Mr Pickthall yet he has not been contacted and upon calling the coroners office recently I have been informed that all investigations are complete apart from the paperwork...What kind of investigation is this?
Mr Pickthall had been anticipating being sent to prison again, and had undertaken forward planning for while he was incarcerated, he had emailed a letter of authority for Mr Dransfield to act as his agent in all matters on his behalf with the exception of his finances and medical records....he already had an agent for those purposes, being myself as his personally appointed official next of kin! There appear to be suicide letters indicating that Mr Pickthall intended to kill himself, upon further examination of these letters of which I have obtained copies there appear to be issues which suggest that they are fake, i must point out that they were also typed and unsigned by Mr Pickthall!
On the very day of Mr Pickthall's death, XXXXXXX visited his solicitors (Cobbleys in Liverpool) after obtaining the information of who is solicitor was from xxxxxxx! I do not know if at that time xxxxxxxxx had obtained the death certificate from the coroner!
xxxxxxxx was unbelievably allowed to keep Mr Pickthall's mobile phone which may have held vital evidence, she was allowed free access to his home and all his belongings, free access to cover or dispose of any incriminating evidence of foul play.
Mr Pickthall was a retired gentleman, in his working days he had been a successful businessman, he had substantial savings. I asked one of his close friends about this when discussing issues of a funeral, she informed me that xxxxxx had told her his money was all " filtered" and was all gone, I asked XXXXXX to ask her where it had gone; When XXXXXX next spoke with xxxxxx she pushed the subject and was told by xxxxxx that Mr Pickthall had "GIFTED" her all his money, this is absurd, Mr Pickthall would never do such a thing without giving her a written statement to substantiate her claim in order to ensure the finger of suspicion were not pointed at her, leaving her wide open to allegations of theft/fraud!
Everyone who knew Mr Pickthall personally will confirm that he was extremely organised, this can be demonstrated by the letters of authority he did for Mr Dransfield and myself.
Xxxxxxx has a realistic motive for murder, being substantial financial gain, however, she is not the only one with a motive to murder Mr Pickthall!
I am a realist, these are not far fetched, ridiculous claims I am making, they are completely plausible, and the more facts that come to light, the more credible they become.
Mr Pickthall had lived and breathed to clear his name that had been dragged through the mud by CWaCC, he'd fought his corner for years, for the first time, with the backing of the ICO his victory was within reach, he wanted this more than anything he'd ever wanted in his life, only a fool would believe he would kill himself when he was so near to his goal,I trust those reading this are not fools!
If Mr Pickthall had lived there would have been a major scandal in Northwich which would have grabbed headline news, there would have been clear cases of maleficence in public office and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and many other charges for CWaCC officials to answer to, inevitably there would have been prison sentences handed out and huge amounts of compensation to pay to Mr Pickthall, not least the High flying well known London barrister who represented CWaCC would also be facing charges of serious fraud, which I shall come back to shortly...
The coroner was informed of all the above information shortly after Mr Pickthall's death. I and others informed him via his assistant Ms Kimberly Douglas and via many emails, that xxxxxx was an impostor, and that I had a handwritten authority signed and dated by Mr Pickthall stating that I WAS his official next of kin and authorising me to make all decisions on his behalf, there were no restrictions on that authority.... (When considering how Mr Pickthall conducted his affairs, going to the trouble of doing two letters of authority, on the balance of probability, isn't it more likely than not, that he would have ensured a letter was written for XXXXXXX if he'd "GIFTED" her his money before committing suicide?)
There is no disputing the authority given me as the letter was handwritten from Strangeways prison on their letter headed writing paper. The coroner requested I email him a copy which I did, yet still he continued to treat xxxxxx as next of kin stating I would be treated as an interested person and kept updated on progress in the case. Surely my letter of authority naming me as NOK and appointing me to make all decisions on his behalf trumped xxxxxxx nothing! Of course to admit this would be an admittance by the coroner that he had made a catastrophic mistake, as he had been at all times liaising with a potential prime suspect in a murder, this beggars belief and is a huge matter of public concern. This is what has caused the conflict of interests in this case!
I emailed the coroner a list of perfectly reasonable questions of which he has refused to answer even one! I have no doubt that you surely know, that In British law there is no automatic right to next of kin, and that this is not automatically given to blood relatives, but to who the coroner decides it should be when taking all the circumstances into consideration, I was asking too many awkward questions, I had identified serious maladministration in a possible murder case, is it any wonder the coroner believes it to be in his own interests to refuse to liaise with me?.
Eventually xxxxxx was in fact stripped of her role as next of kin (proving the maladministration) when xxxxxx came forward after speaking to me, she declined to be next of kin and his xxxxx took on the role, however given that she was completely against xxxxxxx due to her having all Mr Pickthall's money it would appear she may have been "bought off " as it were, as she handed next of kin responsibilities informally back to xxxxxxx who then gave CWaCC authority to dispose of Mr Pickthall's body by cremation which was completely against his wishes as everyone knew he never wanted to be cremated when he died! The coroner also knew this as I had informed him in one of my emails to him!
The coroner has also lied to me. I and other close friends of Mr Pickthall were never informed that his body had been released, despite still making enquiries to the coroners office about what was happening, his body was released on 16th August 2019 and lay in situ for twenty seven days before being cremated without our knowledge on Friday the 13th September (very apt)
The pain I feel at being denied my final farewell or to pay my last respects to my dear friend is second to none. As an interested person I was never contacted once, how dare the coroner deny me and others the right to say goodbye, is it not enough that my friend is dead, and in such dubious circumstances that such additional unnecessary heartache should be further added?
It is also my understanding that no one visually identified Mr Pickthall's body, I was thoroughly prepared to do this...What didn't the coroner want me to see?
As stated Mr Pickthall supposedly died on 30th July 2019 having been struck by the Liverpool to Euston Flyer which is impossible as the timeline of events does not tally, Mr Dransfield contacted BTP and the coroner to inform them of this, he laid out the times and proved that it was impossible. This was also ignored by the coroner and BTP. We contacted the rail company who on two separate occasions we were told by two different people that there were NO FATALITIES recorded anywhere for that night nor for the nights preceding or superseding that night.
There was no disruption to services; when a train strikes a person, the train must be isolated into a depot for thorough inspection which takes roughly three hours, nothing was recorded, we have these telephone conversations confirming no fatalities, we also have this confirmed in writing! Again the coroner and BTP have shown no interest.
The above is not an exhaustive list of concerns, but the last I must mention here is the following which I only recently discovered:
On the day Mr Pickthall met his untimely death he sent an email to xxxxxxx telling her that his emails had been hacked, all his correspondence, private messages in relation to his court appearances, the ICO, Judicial reviews, solicitors, everything going back a whole year had been deleted and wiped clear from his trash mail, he also states that it looked like someone had been cleaning his house...two days later he is dead!
He had also spoken on earlier dates to xxxxxxr about his suspicion that someone had been entering his house when he was not home! THIS SURELY CANNOT BE IGNORED! This information has now also been forwarded to the coroner, though it is doubtful given his track record on this case that it will cause him any concern!
It would appear that the obvious failings in this case by the coroner, are to protect himself due to that massive maladministration issue of NOK, it is clear that to investigate thoroughly is not in the best interests of the coroner, it is in his interest to have the matter swept under the carpet despite it being at the expense of my dead friend
As stated Mr Pickthall died on 30th July yet there has no no press release, nowhere in the public domain can his death be found, it is also confirmed by Chester Registrar Office that his death has not been registered, the coroner has according to the crematorium issued a death certificate in order to have him cremated but over two months have passed and still no register of his death.
Clearly there are highly suspicious circumstances and too many unanswered questions, besides crucial witnesses that have never been contacted, which demonstrates that this case warrants a criminal investigation by another out of area coroner and another branch of BTP as all have failed in even their basic responsibilities!
In matters relating to Wirral Magistrates Court:
This case is directly linked to the above as the barrister involved should also be considered as a suspect in the above case having so much to lose if Mr Pickthall had lived.
Despite taking my evidence of the fraud committed by both CWaCC and Mr Speker to Northwich police station and having their legal team examine it over a four day period Northwich police refuse to bring charges even though their legal team were unable to challenge the validity of the evidence. I have been forced to lay an information myself at Wirral Magistrates Court, it has been over a month now and despite me repeatedly emailing the court legal duty team to progress the matter they are ignoring me, it would appear that certain individuals are being put above the law! The barrister involved (Mr Speker) in committing hundreds of thousands of pounds worth of fraud from the public purse would also be likely to be viewing the inside of a prison cell for a long time, had Mr Pickthall lived!
If this email does not fall into the remit of those to whom i have sent it please advise on who's remit it does fall into as it appears to be the case so far that no governing body is prepared to accept responsibility for taking action.
Regards
Ms Zelda Davies"
Fahmy Malak, a dead medical examiner (UK version of a Coroner) in America was the man who examined the bodies of 16 year old Don Henry and 17 year old Kevin Ives and ruled that those 2 boys had smoked too much cannabis and fallen asleep on the train tracks in 1991 and was ran over by a train. The fact was those 2 young boys had witnessed a drug transaction and was killed and their bodies where layed on the tracks to cover up the murder....sounds familiar?....Is this what had happened to Robert Pickthall, was he getting too close to the truth and they decided to kill him and dispose of the body in the same way?
A second autopsy indicated that Don Henry had been stabbed in the back and Kevin Ives had been struck on the skull and that both boys had been placed on the train tracks unconscious, maybe already dead. A grand jury overruled Malak: The boys had been murdered.
This same examiner (UK version of a coroner ) had been involved in many other scandals cover up MURDER one famous case was The Allbright. On June 28, 1985, Raymond P. Allbright was found in his yard dead of gunshot wounds. Allbright had been arrested the night before on charges of theft. Malak ruled his death a suicide.......But Allbright had been shot five times! all five shots were in the chest.
Even though this is in America you have to understand that America is built of UK Law and have a similar system, same corrupt Medical Examiner (Coroner) and Police Force . The Coroner dealing with Robert Pickthall who seem to be refusing to investigate murder is being employed by Cheshire West and Chester Council, the same council that was and is still at war with Robert Pickthall even in his death. This is the same Council that has also dealt with his secret cremation and funeral, so we can no longer have a second or independent autopsy .....is this not a conflict of interest? The coroner is also the person who appoints the NOK, in the case of Robert Pickthall they have allocated the NOK to a possible murder suspect. The coroner also is working for the Police.....the same police force that did a armed raid on Robert Pickthall house and found nothing criminal.....
You can see how easy it is to cover up Murder by making it look like a suicide
A second autopsy indicated that Don Henry had been stabbed in the back and Kevin Ives had been struck on the skull and that both boys had been placed on the train tracks unconscious, maybe already dead. A grand jury overruled Malak: The boys had been murdered.
This same examiner (UK version of a coroner ) had been involved in many other scandals cover up MURDER one famous case was The Allbright. On June 28, 1985, Raymond P. Allbright was found in his yard dead of gunshot wounds. Allbright had been arrested the night before on charges of theft. Malak ruled his death a suicide.......But Allbright had been shot five times! all five shots were in the chest.
Even though this is in America you have to understand that America is built of UK Law and have a similar system, same corrupt Medical Examiner (Coroner) and Police Force . The Coroner dealing with Robert Pickthall who seem to be refusing to investigate murder is being employed by Cheshire West and Chester Council, the same council that was and is still at war with Robert Pickthall even in his death. This is the same Council that has also dealt with his secret cremation and funeral, so we can no longer have a second or independent autopsy .....is this not a conflict of interest? The coroner is also the person who appoints the NOK, in the case of Robert Pickthall they have allocated the NOK to a possible murder suspect. The coroner also is working for the Police.....the same police force that did a armed raid on Robert Pickthall house and found nothing criminal.....
You can see how easy it is to cover up Murder by making it look like a suicide
Email from Robert Pickthall hours before he was killed, a day before his court appearance . HIS EMAIL ACCOUNT WAS HACKED.
It also shows no sign of suicide or depression, in fact it proves once again forward planning in preparation for his court appearance on the 31st of July 2019 and a possible prison sentence.
Secret funeral, secret cremation, fake NOK, no investigation, his name not made public, no death certificate, his death not registered...............
for more information read below and scroll down our time line
It also shows no sign of suicide or depression, in fact it proves once again forward planning in preparation for his court appearance on the 31st of July 2019 and a possible prison sentence.
Secret funeral, secret cremation, fake NOK, no investigation, his name not made public, no death certificate, his death not registered...............
for more information read below and scroll down our time line
Cheshire West Council and Coroner have released and cremated the alleged Robert Pickthall body without informing the NOK, without anyone being allowed to see the body and ID him & without ANY DEATH CERTIFICATE being produced......wonder why
HOW MANY MORE PEOPLE & MISSING CHILDREN HAVE BEEN CREMATED WITHOUT A DEATH CERTIFICATE ?
THIS CRIME HAS NOW BEEN REPORTED TO THE POLICE
HOW MANY MORE PEOPLE & MISSING CHILDREN HAVE BEEN CREMATED WITHOUT A DEATH CERTIFICATE ?
THIS CRIME HAS NOW BEEN REPORTED TO THE POLICE
SFO Refuses to investigate serious fraud in relation to the murder of Robert Pickthall, this is why we have to now take civil action against those involved in fraud, theft, murder and cover up. Expect a lot more laying of information because we will not go away.
"WHEN POLICE REFUSE TO INVESTIGATE MAJOR FRAUD FROM THE PUBLIC PURSE, FORCING MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO DO THEIR JOB FOR THEM.....
Ten days ago JW served a laying of information at Wirral Magistrates Courts, this is the first step to instigate criminal proceedings. See the laying of information below.
09/09/2019
LAYING AN INFORMATION
Under Part 7, Rule 7.2 of Crim.PR, application is made for the issuance of a warrant of arrest for one Mr Adam Speker of 5 RB Chambers, 5 Gray’s Inn Square, London, WC1R 5AH. I am unable to provide the personal address details for Mr Speker as he is a London Barrister and this information is not available to me.
In accordance with Rule 7.4 I request that the court of attendance be Liverpool Crown Court, this being in the interest of others personally affected by the defendants criminal acts, and who are limited in their finances to travel. I also request that the hearing take place as soon as possible as the allegations against the defendant relate to a recently deceased individual.
The allegations are set out below in compliance with Rule 7.3 and clearly demonstrate that the allegations are in relation to indictable offences which may only be dealt with in HM Crown Courts, and which are punishable by imprisonment.
Allegations:
As defined under The Fraud Act 2006:
Section 2 Fraud by False Representation 1a, 1b(i)(ii), 2a, 2b, 4 and 5
Section 3 Fraud by Failing to disclose information 3(a)(b)(i)(ii)
Section 4 Fraud by Abuse of Position (1)(a)(b))c)(i)(ii)(2)
Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice.
Statement of Offences:
On or about the 22nd January 2015 Cheshire West and Chester Council (CWaCC) did obtain the advice and subsequent services of Mr Adam Speaker to represent them under Civil Procedure rules in the case of CWaCC v Robert Pickthall, case number: B90MA221.
Mr Speker was aware that in 2013 CWaCC had attempted to obtain injunctive relief against Mr Pickthall under the Harassment Act 1997 via Criminal Procedure rules, and that Mr Pickthall had been arrested by armed police who confiscated all his communications equipment in order to obtain evidence of the alleged harassment, which CWaCC claimed to be in the form of 1200 abusive emails. After a five-month investigation the evidence of such emails was proven to be non-existent, Mr Pickthall was not charged, and his communications equipment was returned to him.
Mr Pickthall endeavoured to seek redress through the courts. Representing himself as a litigant in person he filed a case against CWaCC, who then sought the advice and subsequent services of expert in Harassment Law Barrister Adam Speker. Mr Speker’s services were at all times “bought in” by CWaCC, he was fully aware of how the case was being funded, and by financially benefiting through the representation of his clients Mr Speker did knowingly and repeatedly commit serious fraud.
Knowing the aforementioned, Mr Speaker did conspire with CWaCC in order to pervert the course of justice, by knowingly abusing his power as a barrister and using his expertise to obtain the required injunctive relief on behalf of CWaCC, despite knowing this to be an abuse of the judicial process, and knowing that the evidence on which his clients relied, was in fact the same fictitious evidence as before which had been proven to be non-existent!
When applying to the court for injunctive relief on behalf of his clients, Mr Speker did deliberately mislead the judge into believing that he would be presenting his clients “evidence” at the trial which Mr Pickthall had filed against CWaCC, that evidence being the same fictitious emails that he knew did not exist, this was a deliberately deceptive representation in which Mr Speker pulled the wool over the judges eyes in order to obtain the required injunctive relief for his clients!
Once the injunctive relief was secured Mr Speker, having no intention of allowing Mr Pickthall’s case to pursue through to trial did make a successful application to have Mr Pickthall’s case struck out on a technicality....however the injunctive relief obtained remained valid, and a further four years of legal wrangling and court appearances followed, all at the expense of the public purse.
The injunctive relief obtained by Mr Speker for his clients was claimed under section 1, 1A, 3 and 3A of The Protection From Harassment Act 1997. It was a representative claim with named individuals meaning that those individuals would be bringing a claim in respect of themselves and all others who have the same interest in the claim as they do [ see cpr19.6] CWaCC named four individuals who were directly involved in the case.
In accordance with the rules of the Harassment Act 1997, only individuals, not organisations/ corporate companies are entitled to claim such relief, this being the case only the four council officials named by CWaCC would be entitled to such relief, and only they could bring the claim. This is an identical case to that of Sunderland Housing Company & others v Baines & others 2006 in which Mr Speker himself acted, the circumstances are identical except for one very important factor; in that case Mr Speker acted on behalf of the defendants, and THE COURT CONFIRMED THAT NEITHER A COMPANY NOR A PUBLIC AUTHORITY MAY SEEK RELIEF BY WAY OF THE 1997 ACT...In essence, Mr Speker not only proved that case on behalf of his clients, but ironically he has also proven this case against himself!
The case referred to above clearly proves that at the time Mr Speker agreed to represent CWaCC against Mr Pickthall, he was at all times fully aware that it was not legal to do so, therefor it is conclusive that Mr Speker has in fact proven himself to be guilty of all criminal charges alleged in this laying of information.
Unfortunately Mr Pickthall is unable to fight his corner any longer as on the 30th July this year his dead body was found at Acton bridge train station, he was due in court on 1st August on charges of contempt in relation to this case, summoned yet again by an abuse of process by CWaCC and their legal team, who in fact were in contempt of court at having issued committal proceedings. Mr Pickthall was a very dear friend of mine; his death has impacted massively upon me and I shall not rest until those I believe to be in part responsible for his death are brought to account.
I look forward to confirmation of referral of this case to Crown Court. If for any reason I am told that this case is without merit, I shall be seeking a judicial review.
Kind regards
Mrs Zelda Davies and others.
RESPONSE THE FOLLOWING DAY BY WIRRAL MAGISTRATES COURTS DUTY LEGAL TEAM....
Dear Mrs Davies
Subject: Laying of Information
Your application to institute proceedings via information and the issue of a warrant , cannot proceed to be considered without an indication as to whether the allegations you raise in your letter have been reported to the police for investigation, if they have, please advise what if any action the police took?
I await your reply
yours sincerely
Courts Duty Legal Team
Crime Team
HMCTS
THE COURTS DUTY LEGAL TEAM DID NOT HAVE TO AWAIT OUR REPLY FOR VERY LONG AS THE NEXT DAY THEY WERE GIVEN THE INFORMATION THEY HAD REQUESTED; SEE BELOW.
Dear Sir/madam
On Monday 9th September 2019 I did lay an information at Birkenhead Magistrates Court in relation to the issuance of a warrant to arrest one Mr Adam Speker on serious charges of Fraud and Conspiracy to pervert the course of Justice.
Thank you for your response letter to me today dated 10th September 2019 requesting further information in regards to the matter, this information is detailed below:
On 14th August 2019, I and others did attend a pre booked appointment at Northwich police station in relation to the matter, having four days earlier presented at Northwich police station all the allegations and proof contained therein my laying of information documentation. This was passed to Northwich police legal team in order that they may confirm the validity of the allegations and check the law in relation to such allegations.
On the date of our appointment a young PC was sent to speak with us, he knew nothing of why we were there, and nothing of the typed up information that had been presented at the police station four days prior to our attendance that day.
The officer, a PC Lee did however confirm that the legal team knew of the document delivered. I requested to speak with a senior officer and PC Lee left the room, returning approx. ten minutes later to inform us that senior officer DS Lyons had refused to speak with us! DS Lyons instructed PC Lee to tell us that it was a matter for the bar standards, to which I informed PC Lee that the bar standards hold no authority to arrest Mr Speker on criminal charges and that I had in fact contacted the bar standards on an earlier occasion and that they had confirmed this to be so. PC Lee was adamant that DS Lyons would not speak to us.
I requested that as the police legal team had brought no challenge to the allegations and evidence I had presented to them, the charges should be put to the CPS for a charging decision, my request was refused! With the permission of PC Lee, the above conversation was taped by my colleague in the interview room!
Before leaving Northwich police station I requested an incident number which is
IML: 482342
Since that meeting I and others have made numerous attempts to have police arrest and charge Mr Speker on the allegations contained therein my laying of information. I have contacted the Northwich Chief Constable Darren Martland who refuses to engage with me over this matter despite it being an operational issue, and I have contacted Northwich Police Crime Commissioner Paul Crowther who refuses to acknowledge that this is a matter that falls within his remit, he being accountable for the actions/ non actions of the Chief Constables failure to perform his lawful duty. All correspondence was via email which of course I do have as proof of my efforts to have police deal with the matter.
Having exhausted all options available to me, on the 1st September 2019, I emailed the CC and the PCC informing them that if no arrest was made within seven days, and their repeated failure to uphold the law continued then I would en devour to do their job for them and instigate proceedings against Mr Speker myself. They have held me to my word, hence my laying of information which is now with yourself.
I hope I have provided you with all the information you require to now proceed further with the case.
Kind regards
Ms Zelda Davies.
IT HAS NOW BEEN A WEEK SINCE THIS EMAIL WAS SENT TO THE DUTY LEGAL TEAM, TONIGHT BEING 19/09/2019 WE SENT THIS NEXT EMAIL....
Dear Sir /Madam
Nine days ago, on the 09/09/2019 I did Lay an Information at Wirral Magistrates Court, this was in relation to serious fraud and perverting the course of justice, indictable offences triable only within a Crown Court.
In accordance with criminal procedure rules I did Lay this information in the correct manner clearly demonstrating all credibility and merit.
The following day, being the 10/09/2019, I did receive a letter from your legal team informing me that my application to institute proceedings via information and the issuance of a warrant of arrest could not proceed to be considered without an indication as to whether the allegations I raised had been reported to the police for investigation, and if they had to advice you of what action if any the police took.
The following day being 11/09/2019 I did respond via email to the aforementioned letter, I did go into great detail of the lengths I had gone to in order to have the police deal with the matter. Having given you all the information you state prevented you from proceeding further I did expect a speedy response back from you, however that has not been the case and it has now been a full week since I complied with your request for information.
Please advise me on when to expect my laying of Information to proceed.
Kind regards
Mrs Zelda Davies
WILL WIRRAL MAGISTRATES COURT DO THEIR LAWFUL DUTY AND PROCEED AS IS REQUIRED OF THEM? .......WATCH THIS SPACE."
"WHEN POLICE REFUSE TO INVESTIGATE MAJOR FRAUD FROM THE PUBLIC PURSE, FORCING MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO DO THEIR JOB FOR THEM.....
Ten days ago JW served a laying of information at Wirral Magistrates Courts, this is the first step to instigate criminal proceedings. See the laying of information below.
09/09/2019
LAYING AN INFORMATION
Under Part 7, Rule 7.2 of Crim.PR, application is made for the issuance of a warrant of arrest for one Mr Adam Speker of 5 RB Chambers, 5 Gray’s Inn Square, London, WC1R 5AH. I am unable to provide the personal address details for Mr Speker as he is a London Barrister and this information is not available to me.
In accordance with Rule 7.4 I request that the court of attendance be Liverpool Crown Court, this being in the interest of others personally affected by the defendants criminal acts, and who are limited in their finances to travel. I also request that the hearing take place as soon as possible as the allegations against the defendant relate to a recently deceased individual.
The allegations are set out below in compliance with Rule 7.3 and clearly demonstrate that the allegations are in relation to indictable offences which may only be dealt with in HM Crown Courts, and which are punishable by imprisonment.
Allegations:
As defined under The Fraud Act 2006:
Section 2 Fraud by False Representation 1a, 1b(i)(ii), 2a, 2b, 4 and 5
Section 3 Fraud by Failing to disclose information 3(a)(b)(i)(ii)
Section 4 Fraud by Abuse of Position (1)(a)(b))c)(i)(ii)(2)
Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice.
Statement of Offences:
On or about the 22nd January 2015 Cheshire West and Chester Council (CWaCC) did obtain the advice and subsequent services of Mr Adam Speaker to represent them under Civil Procedure rules in the case of CWaCC v Robert Pickthall, case number: B90MA221.
Mr Speker was aware that in 2013 CWaCC had attempted to obtain injunctive relief against Mr Pickthall under the Harassment Act 1997 via Criminal Procedure rules, and that Mr Pickthall had been arrested by armed police who confiscated all his communications equipment in order to obtain evidence of the alleged harassment, which CWaCC claimed to be in the form of 1200 abusive emails. After a five-month investigation the evidence of such emails was proven to be non-existent, Mr Pickthall was not charged, and his communications equipment was returned to him.
Mr Pickthall endeavoured to seek redress through the courts. Representing himself as a litigant in person he filed a case against CWaCC, who then sought the advice and subsequent services of expert in Harassment Law Barrister Adam Speker. Mr Speker’s services were at all times “bought in” by CWaCC, he was fully aware of how the case was being funded, and by financially benefiting through the representation of his clients Mr Speker did knowingly and repeatedly commit serious fraud.
Knowing the aforementioned, Mr Speaker did conspire with CWaCC in order to pervert the course of justice, by knowingly abusing his power as a barrister and using his expertise to obtain the required injunctive relief on behalf of CWaCC, despite knowing this to be an abuse of the judicial process, and knowing that the evidence on which his clients relied, was in fact the same fictitious evidence as before which had been proven to be non-existent!
When applying to the court for injunctive relief on behalf of his clients, Mr Speker did deliberately mislead the judge into believing that he would be presenting his clients “evidence” at the trial which Mr Pickthall had filed against CWaCC, that evidence being the same fictitious emails that he knew did not exist, this was a deliberately deceptive representation in which Mr Speker pulled the wool over the judges eyes in order to obtain the required injunctive relief for his clients!
Once the injunctive relief was secured Mr Speker, having no intention of allowing Mr Pickthall’s case to pursue through to trial did make a successful application to have Mr Pickthall’s case struck out on a technicality....however the injunctive relief obtained remained valid, and a further four years of legal wrangling and court appearances followed, all at the expense of the public purse.
The injunctive relief obtained by Mr Speker for his clients was claimed under section 1, 1A, 3 and 3A of The Protection From Harassment Act 1997. It was a representative claim with named individuals meaning that those individuals would be bringing a claim in respect of themselves and all others who have the same interest in the claim as they do [ see cpr19.6] CWaCC named four individuals who were directly involved in the case.
In accordance with the rules of the Harassment Act 1997, only individuals, not organisations/ corporate companies are entitled to claim such relief, this being the case only the four council officials named by CWaCC would be entitled to such relief, and only they could bring the claim. This is an identical case to that of Sunderland Housing Company & others v Baines & others 2006 in which Mr Speker himself acted, the circumstances are identical except for one very important factor; in that case Mr Speker acted on behalf of the defendants, and THE COURT CONFIRMED THAT NEITHER A COMPANY NOR A PUBLIC AUTHORITY MAY SEEK RELIEF BY WAY OF THE 1997 ACT...In essence, Mr Speker not only proved that case on behalf of his clients, but ironically he has also proven this case against himself!
The case referred to above clearly proves that at the time Mr Speker agreed to represent CWaCC against Mr Pickthall, he was at all times fully aware that it was not legal to do so, therefor it is conclusive that Mr Speker has in fact proven himself to be guilty of all criminal charges alleged in this laying of information.
Unfortunately Mr Pickthall is unable to fight his corner any longer as on the 30th July this year his dead body was found at Acton bridge train station, he was due in court on 1st August on charges of contempt in relation to this case, summoned yet again by an abuse of process by CWaCC and their legal team, who in fact were in contempt of court at having issued committal proceedings. Mr Pickthall was a very dear friend of mine; his death has impacted massively upon me and I shall not rest until those I believe to be in part responsible for his death are brought to account.
I look forward to confirmation of referral of this case to Crown Court. If for any reason I am told that this case is without merit, I shall be seeking a judicial review.
Kind regards
Mrs Zelda Davies and others.
RESPONSE THE FOLLOWING DAY BY WIRRAL MAGISTRATES COURTS DUTY LEGAL TEAM....
Dear Mrs Davies
Subject: Laying of Information
Your application to institute proceedings via information and the issue of a warrant , cannot proceed to be considered without an indication as to whether the allegations you raise in your letter have been reported to the police for investigation, if they have, please advise what if any action the police took?
I await your reply
yours sincerely
Courts Duty Legal Team
Crime Team
HMCTS
THE COURTS DUTY LEGAL TEAM DID NOT HAVE TO AWAIT OUR REPLY FOR VERY LONG AS THE NEXT DAY THEY WERE GIVEN THE INFORMATION THEY HAD REQUESTED; SEE BELOW.
Dear Sir/madam
On Monday 9th September 2019 I did lay an information at Birkenhead Magistrates Court in relation to the issuance of a warrant to arrest one Mr Adam Speker on serious charges of Fraud and Conspiracy to pervert the course of Justice.
Thank you for your response letter to me today dated 10th September 2019 requesting further information in regards to the matter, this information is detailed below:
On 14th August 2019, I and others did attend a pre booked appointment at Northwich police station in relation to the matter, having four days earlier presented at Northwich police station all the allegations and proof contained therein my laying of information documentation. This was passed to Northwich police legal team in order that they may confirm the validity of the allegations and check the law in relation to such allegations.
On the date of our appointment a young PC was sent to speak with us, he knew nothing of why we were there, and nothing of the typed up information that had been presented at the police station four days prior to our attendance that day.
The officer, a PC Lee did however confirm that the legal team knew of the document delivered. I requested to speak with a senior officer and PC Lee left the room, returning approx. ten minutes later to inform us that senior officer DS Lyons had refused to speak with us! DS Lyons instructed PC Lee to tell us that it was a matter for the bar standards, to which I informed PC Lee that the bar standards hold no authority to arrest Mr Speker on criminal charges and that I had in fact contacted the bar standards on an earlier occasion and that they had confirmed this to be so. PC Lee was adamant that DS Lyons would not speak to us.
I requested that as the police legal team had brought no challenge to the allegations and evidence I had presented to them, the charges should be put to the CPS for a charging decision, my request was refused! With the permission of PC Lee, the above conversation was taped by my colleague in the interview room!
Before leaving Northwich police station I requested an incident number which is
IML: 482342
Since that meeting I and others have made numerous attempts to have police arrest and charge Mr Speker on the allegations contained therein my laying of information. I have contacted the Northwich Chief Constable Darren Martland who refuses to engage with me over this matter despite it being an operational issue, and I have contacted Northwich Police Crime Commissioner Paul Crowther who refuses to acknowledge that this is a matter that falls within his remit, he being accountable for the actions/ non actions of the Chief Constables failure to perform his lawful duty. All correspondence was via email which of course I do have as proof of my efforts to have police deal with the matter.
Having exhausted all options available to me, on the 1st September 2019, I emailed the CC and the PCC informing them that if no arrest was made within seven days, and their repeated failure to uphold the law continued then I would en devour to do their job for them and instigate proceedings against Mr Speker myself. They have held me to my word, hence my laying of information which is now with yourself.
I hope I have provided you with all the information you require to now proceed further with the case.
Kind regards
Ms Zelda Davies.
IT HAS NOW BEEN A WEEK SINCE THIS EMAIL WAS SENT TO THE DUTY LEGAL TEAM, TONIGHT BEING 19/09/2019 WE SENT THIS NEXT EMAIL....
Dear Sir /Madam
Nine days ago, on the 09/09/2019 I did Lay an Information at Wirral Magistrates Court, this was in relation to serious fraud and perverting the course of justice, indictable offences triable only within a Crown Court.
In accordance with criminal procedure rules I did Lay this information in the correct manner clearly demonstrating all credibility and merit.
The following day, being the 10/09/2019, I did receive a letter from your legal team informing me that my application to institute proceedings via information and the issuance of a warrant of arrest could not proceed to be considered without an indication as to whether the allegations I raised had been reported to the police for investigation, and if they had to advice you of what action if any the police took.
The following day being 11/09/2019 I did respond via email to the aforementioned letter, I did go into great detail of the lengths I had gone to in order to have the police deal with the matter. Having given you all the information you state prevented you from proceeding further I did expect a speedy response back from you, however that has not been the case and it has now been a full week since I complied with your request for information.
Please advise me on when to expect my laying of Information to proceed.
Kind regards
Mrs Zelda Davies
WILL WIRRAL MAGISTRATES COURT DO THEIR LAWFUL DUTY AND PROCEED AS IS REQUIRED OF THEM? .......WATCH THIS SPACE."
Crematorium and Coroner admit the fake NOK appointed by BTP has been stripped of title!
This in itself proves fraud has taken place and malpractice by BTP especially as we believe she is complicit in his murder which has been reported and ignored by EVERYONE.
Why is EVERYONE refusing to acknowledge a legal document showing who is the real NOK?
Why did the BTP appoint a fake NOK with no documentation or credentials in fact ALL of Bobs friends have reported to the police she WAS NOT HIS PARTNER or NOK?
Why was there no investigation into who could be NOK?
Why is the fake NOK not being investigated?
Why did BTP hand over Bobs property to the fake NOK? Why was she allowed to keep his mobile phone and go through his paperwork? Why was she allowed to have complete unlimited access to his home which could have been a potential crime scene?
This in itself proves fraud has taken place and malpractice by BTP especially as we believe she is complicit in his murder which has been reported and ignored by EVERYONE.
Why is EVERYONE refusing to acknowledge a legal document showing who is the real NOK?
Why did the BTP appoint a fake NOK with no documentation or credentials in fact ALL of Bobs friends have reported to the police she WAS NOT HIS PARTNER or NOK?
Why was there no investigation into who could be NOK?
Why is the fake NOK not being investigated?
Why did BTP hand over Bobs property to the fake NOK? Why was she allowed to keep his mobile phone and go through his paperwork? Why was she allowed to have complete unlimited access to his home which could have been a potential crime scene?
We found out today that the Fake NOK who was appointed by BTP has been stripped of her title which is in it self a self admittance by BTP that she was not the real NOK and therefore BTP should not have gave her access to his house, belongings and money. This in itself proves fraud has taken place and malpractice by BTP especially as we believe she is complicit in his murder which has been reported and ignored.
We also found out today that the secret funeral was not carried out by the NOK but by Chester West Council, the same Council that told lies about him, got armed police to raid his house, imprison him and we believe is also complicit in his murder.
His funeral was not published by the council but held in secret.
His death still has not been published and unregistered.
His name still has not been officially published.
No one has seen his body, No one seems to have attended his funeral
Where is his money, why didnt his family deal with his funeral, what part did the Fake NOK play in this secret funeral
Cremated before an Inquest
THERE IS NOTHING NORMAL ABOUT THIS CASE
We also found out today that the secret funeral was not carried out by the NOK but by Chester West Council, the same Council that told lies about him, got armed police to raid his house, imprison him and we believe is also complicit in his murder.
His funeral was not published by the council but held in secret.
His death still has not been published and unregistered.
His name still has not been officially published.
No one has seen his body, No one seems to have attended his funeral
Where is his money, why didnt his family deal with his funeral, what part did the Fake NOK play in this secret funeral
Cremated before an Inquest
THERE IS NOTHING NORMAL ABOUT THIS CASE
WHEN POLICE REFUSE TO INVESTIGATE MAJOR FRAUD FROM THE PUBLIC PURSE, FORCING MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO DO THEIR JOB FOR THEM.....
Ten days ago JW served a laying of information at Wirral Magistrates Courts, this is the first step to instigate criminal proceedings. See the laying of information below.
09/09/2019
LAYING AN INFORMATION
Under Part 7, Rule 7.2 of Crim.PR, application is made for the issuance of a warrant of arrest for one Mr Adam Speker of 5 RB Chambers, 5 Gray’s Inn Square, London, WC1R 5AH. I am unable to provide the personal address details for Mr Speker as he is a London Barrister and this information is not available to me.
In accordance with Rule 7.4 I request that the court of attendance be Liverpool Crown Court, this being in the interest of others personally affected by the defendants criminal acts, and who are limited in their finances to travel. I also request that the hearing take place as soon as possible as the allegations against the defendant relate to a recently deceased individual.
The allegations are set out below in compliance with Rule 7.3 and clearly demonstrate that the allegations are in relation to indictable offences which may only be dealt with in HM Crown Courts, and which are punishable by imprisonment.
Allegations:
As defined under The Fraud Act 2006:
Section 2 Fraud by False Representation 1a, 1b(i)(ii), 2a, 2b, 4 and 5
Section 3 Fraud by Failing to disclose information 3(a)(b)(i)(ii)
Section 4 Fraud by Abuse of Position (1)(a)(b))c)(i)(ii)(2)
Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice.
Statement of Offences:
On or about the 22nd January 2015 Cheshire West and Chester Council (CWaCC) did obtain the advice and subsequent services of Mr Adam Speaker to represent them under Civil Procedure rules in the case of CWaCC v Robert Pickthall, case number: B90MA221.
Mr Speker was aware that in 2013 CWaCC had attempted to obtain injunctive relief against Mr Pickthall under the Harassment Act 1997 via Criminal Procedure rules, and that Mr Pickthall had been arrested by armed police who confiscated all his communications equipment in order to obtain evidence of the alleged harassment, which CWaCC claimed to be in the form of 1200 abusive emails. After a five-month investigation the evidence of such emails was proven to be non-existent, Mr Pickthall was not charged, and his communications equipment was returned to him.
Mr Pickthall endeavoured to seek redress through the courts. Representing himself as a litigant in person he filed a case against CWaCC, who then sought the advice and subsequent services of expert in Harassment Law Barrister Adam Speker. Mr Speker’s services were at all times “bought in” by CWaCC, he was fully aware of how the case was being funded, and by financially benefiting through the representation of his clients Mr Speker did knowingly and repeatedly commit serious fraud.
Knowing the aforementioned, Mr Speaker did conspire with CWaCC in order to pervert the course of justice, by knowingly abusing his power as a barrister and using his expertise to obtain the required injunctive relief on behalf of CWaCC, despite knowing this to be an abuse of the judicial process, and knowing that the evidence on which his clients relied, was in fact the same fictitious evidence as before which had been proven to be non-existent!
When applying to the court for injunctive relief on behalf of his clients, Mr Speker did deliberately mislead the judge into believing that he would be presenting his clients “evidence” at the trial which Mr Pickthall had filed against CWaCC, that evidence being the same fictitious emails that he knew did not exist, this was a deliberately deceptive representation in which Mr Speker pulled the wool over the judges eyes in order to obtain the required injunctive relief for his clients!
Once the injunctive relief was secured Mr Speker, having no intention of allowing Mr Pickthall’s case to pursue through to trial did make a successful application to have Mr Pickthall’s case struck out on a technicality....however the injunctive relief obtained remained valid, and a further four years of legal wrangling and court appearances followed, all at the expense of the public purse.
The injunctive relief obtained by Mr Speker for his clients was claimed under section 1, 1A, 3 and 3A of The Protection From Harassment Act 1997. It was a representative claim with named individuals meaning that those individuals would be bringing a claim in respect of themselves and all others who have the same interest in the claim as they do [ see cpr19.6] CWaCC named four individuals who were directly involved in the case. In accordance with the rules of the Harassment Act 1997, only individuals, not organisations/ corporate companies are entitled to claim such relief, this being the case only the four council officials named by CWaCC would be entitled to such relief, and only they could bring the claim. This is an identical case to that of Sunderland Housing Company & others v Baines & others 2006 in which Mr Speker himself acted, the circumstances are identical except for one very important factor; in that case Mr Speker acted on behalf of the defendants, and THE COURT CONFIRMED THAT NEITHER A COMPANY NOR A PUBLIC AUTHORITY MAY SEEK RELIEF BY WAY OF THE 1997 ACT...In essence, Mr Speker not only proved that case on behalf of his clients, but ironically he has also proven this case against himself!
The case referred to above clearly proves that at the time Mr Speker agreed to represent CWaCC against Mr Pickthall, he was at all times fully aware that it was not legal to do so, therefor it is conclusive that Mr Speker has in fact proven himself to be guilty of all criminal charges alleged in this laying of information.
Unfortunately Mr Pickthall is unable to fight his corner any longer as on the 30th July this year his dead body was found at Acton bridge train station, he was due in court on 1st August on charges of contempt in relation to this case, summoned yet again by an abuse of process by CWaCC and their legal team, who in fact were in contempt of court at having issued committal proceedings. Mr Pickthall was a very dear friend of mine; his death has impacted massively upon me and I shall not rest until those I believe to be in part responsible for his death are brought to account.
I look forward to confirmation of referral of this case to Crown Court. If for any reason I am told that this case is without merit, I shall be seeking a judicial review.
Kind regards
Mrs Zelda Davies and others.
RESPONSE THE FOLLOWING DAY BY WIRRAL MAGISTRATES COURTS DUTY LEGAL TEAM....
Dear Mrs Davies
Subject: Laying of Information
Your application to institute proceedings via information and the issue of a warrant , cannot proceed to be considered without an indication as to whether the allegations you raise in your letter have been reported to the police for investigation, if they have, please advise what if any action the police took?
I await your reply
yours sincerely
Courts Duty Legal Team
Crime Team
HMCTS
THE COURTS DUTY LEGAL TEAM DID NOT HAVE TO AWAIT OUR REPLY FOR VERY LONG AS THE NEXT DAY THEY WERE GIVEN THE INFORMATION THEY HAD REQUESTED; SEE BELOW.
Dear Sir/madam
On Monday 9th September 2019 I did lay an information at Birkenhead Magistrates Court in relation to the issuance of a warrant to arrest one Mr Adam Speker on serious charges of Fraud and Conspiracy to pervert the course of Justice.
Thank you for your response letter to me today dated 10th September 2019 requesting further information in regards to the matter, this information is detailed below:
On 14th August 2019, I and others did attend a pre booked appointment at Northwich police station in relation to the matter, having four days earlier presented at Northwich police station all the allegations and proof contained therein my laying of information documentation. This was passed to Northwich police legal team in order that they may confirm the validity of the allegations and check the law in relation to such allegations.
On the date of our appointment a young PC was sent to speak with us, he knew nothing of why we were there, and nothing of the typed up information that had been presented at the police station four days prior to our attendance that day.
The officer, a PC Lee did however confirm that the legal team knew of the document delivered. I requested to speak with a senior officer and PC Lee left the room, returning approx. ten minutes later to inform us that senior officer DS Lyons had refused to speak with us! DS Lyons instructed PC Lee to tell us that it was a matter for the bar standards, to which I informed PC Lee that the bar standards hold no authority to arrest Mr Speker on criminal charges and that I had in fact contacted the bar standards on an earlier occasion and that they had confirmed this to be so. PC Lee was adamant that DS Lyons would not speak to us. I requested that as the police legal team had brought no challenge to the allegations and evidence I had presented to them, the charges should be put to the CPS for a charging decision, my request was refused! With the permission of PC Lee, the above conversation was taped by my colleague in the interview room!
Before leaving Northwich police station I requested an incident number which is
IML: 482342
Since that meeting I and others have made numerous attempts to have police arrest and charge Mr Speker on the allegations contained therein my laying of information. I have contacted the Northwich Chief Constable Darren Martland who refuses to engage with me over this matter despite it being an operational issue, and I have contacted Northwich Police Crime Commissioner Paul Crowther who refuses to acknowledge that this is a matter that falls within his remit, he being accountable for the actions/ non actions of the Chief Constables failure to perform his lawful duty. All correspondence was via email which of course I do have as proof of my efforts to have police deal with the matter.
Having exhausted all options available to me, on the 1st September 2019, I emailed the CC and the PCC informing them that if no arrest was made within seven days, and their repeated failure to uphold the law continued then I would en devour to do their job for them and instigate proceedings against Mr Speker myself. They have held me to my word, hence my laying of information which is now with yourself.
I hope I have provided you with all the information you require to now proceed further with the case.
Kind regards
Ms Zelda Davies.
IT HAS NOW BEEN A WEEK SINCE THIS EMAIL WAS SENT TO THE DUTY LEGAL TEAM, TONIGHT BEING 19/09/2019 WE SENT THIS NEXT EMAIL....
Dear Sir /Madam
Nine days ago, on the 09/09/2019 I did Lay an Information at Wirral Magistrates Court, this was in relation to serious fraud and perverting the course of justice, indictable offences triable only within a Crown Court.
In accordance with criminal procedure rules I did Lay this information in the correct manner clearly demonstrating all credibility and merit.
The following day, being the 10/09/2019, I did receive a letter from your legal team informing me that my application to institute proceedings via information and the issuance of a warrant of arrest could not proceed to be considered without an indication as to whether the allegations I raised had been reported to the police for investigation, and if they had to advice you of what action if any the police took.
The following day being 11/09/2019 I did respond via email to the aforementioned letter, I did go into great detail of the lengths I had gone to in order to have the police deal with the matter. Having given you all the information you state prevented you from proceeding further I did expect a speedy response back from you, however that has not been the case and it has now been a full week since I complied with your request for information.
Please advise me on when to expect my laying of Information to proceed.
Kind regards
Mrs Zelda Davies
WILL WIRRAL MAGISTRATES COURT DO THEIR LAWFUL DUTY AND PROCEED AS IS REQUIRED OF THEM? .......WATCH THIS SPACE.
Ten days ago JW served a laying of information at Wirral Magistrates Courts, this is the first step to instigate criminal proceedings. See the laying of information below.
09/09/2019
LAYING AN INFORMATION
Under Part 7, Rule 7.2 of Crim.PR, application is made for the issuance of a warrant of arrest for one Mr Adam Speker of 5 RB Chambers, 5 Gray’s Inn Square, London, WC1R 5AH. I am unable to provide the personal address details for Mr Speker as he is a London Barrister and this information is not available to me.
In accordance with Rule 7.4 I request that the court of attendance be Liverpool Crown Court, this being in the interest of others personally affected by the defendants criminal acts, and who are limited in their finances to travel. I also request that the hearing take place as soon as possible as the allegations against the defendant relate to a recently deceased individual.
The allegations are set out below in compliance with Rule 7.3 and clearly demonstrate that the allegations are in relation to indictable offences which may only be dealt with in HM Crown Courts, and which are punishable by imprisonment.
Allegations:
As defined under The Fraud Act 2006:
Section 2 Fraud by False Representation 1a, 1b(i)(ii), 2a, 2b, 4 and 5
Section 3 Fraud by Failing to disclose information 3(a)(b)(i)(ii)
Section 4 Fraud by Abuse of Position (1)(a)(b))c)(i)(ii)(2)
Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice.
Statement of Offences:
On or about the 22nd January 2015 Cheshire West and Chester Council (CWaCC) did obtain the advice and subsequent services of Mr Adam Speaker to represent them under Civil Procedure rules in the case of CWaCC v Robert Pickthall, case number: B90MA221.
Mr Speker was aware that in 2013 CWaCC had attempted to obtain injunctive relief against Mr Pickthall under the Harassment Act 1997 via Criminal Procedure rules, and that Mr Pickthall had been arrested by armed police who confiscated all his communications equipment in order to obtain evidence of the alleged harassment, which CWaCC claimed to be in the form of 1200 abusive emails. After a five-month investigation the evidence of such emails was proven to be non-existent, Mr Pickthall was not charged, and his communications equipment was returned to him.
Mr Pickthall endeavoured to seek redress through the courts. Representing himself as a litigant in person he filed a case against CWaCC, who then sought the advice and subsequent services of expert in Harassment Law Barrister Adam Speker. Mr Speker’s services were at all times “bought in” by CWaCC, he was fully aware of how the case was being funded, and by financially benefiting through the representation of his clients Mr Speker did knowingly and repeatedly commit serious fraud.
Knowing the aforementioned, Mr Speaker did conspire with CWaCC in order to pervert the course of justice, by knowingly abusing his power as a barrister and using his expertise to obtain the required injunctive relief on behalf of CWaCC, despite knowing this to be an abuse of the judicial process, and knowing that the evidence on which his clients relied, was in fact the same fictitious evidence as before which had been proven to be non-existent!
When applying to the court for injunctive relief on behalf of his clients, Mr Speker did deliberately mislead the judge into believing that he would be presenting his clients “evidence” at the trial which Mr Pickthall had filed against CWaCC, that evidence being the same fictitious emails that he knew did not exist, this was a deliberately deceptive representation in which Mr Speker pulled the wool over the judges eyes in order to obtain the required injunctive relief for his clients!
Once the injunctive relief was secured Mr Speker, having no intention of allowing Mr Pickthall’s case to pursue through to trial did make a successful application to have Mr Pickthall’s case struck out on a technicality....however the injunctive relief obtained remained valid, and a further four years of legal wrangling and court appearances followed, all at the expense of the public purse.
The injunctive relief obtained by Mr Speker for his clients was claimed under section 1, 1A, 3 and 3A of The Protection From Harassment Act 1997. It was a representative claim with named individuals meaning that those individuals would be bringing a claim in respect of themselves and all others who have the same interest in the claim as they do [ see cpr19.6] CWaCC named four individuals who were directly involved in the case. In accordance with the rules of the Harassment Act 1997, only individuals, not organisations/ corporate companies are entitled to claim such relief, this being the case only the four council officials named by CWaCC would be entitled to such relief, and only they could bring the claim. This is an identical case to that of Sunderland Housing Company & others v Baines & others 2006 in which Mr Speker himself acted, the circumstances are identical except for one very important factor; in that case Mr Speker acted on behalf of the defendants, and THE COURT CONFIRMED THAT NEITHER A COMPANY NOR A PUBLIC AUTHORITY MAY SEEK RELIEF BY WAY OF THE 1997 ACT...In essence, Mr Speker not only proved that case on behalf of his clients, but ironically he has also proven this case against himself!
The case referred to above clearly proves that at the time Mr Speker agreed to represent CWaCC against Mr Pickthall, he was at all times fully aware that it was not legal to do so, therefor it is conclusive that Mr Speker has in fact proven himself to be guilty of all criminal charges alleged in this laying of information.
Unfortunately Mr Pickthall is unable to fight his corner any longer as on the 30th July this year his dead body was found at Acton bridge train station, he was due in court on 1st August on charges of contempt in relation to this case, summoned yet again by an abuse of process by CWaCC and their legal team, who in fact were in contempt of court at having issued committal proceedings. Mr Pickthall was a very dear friend of mine; his death has impacted massively upon me and I shall not rest until those I believe to be in part responsible for his death are brought to account.
I look forward to confirmation of referral of this case to Crown Court. If for any reason I am told that this case is without merit, I shall be seeking a judicial review.
Kind regards
Mrs Zelda Davies and others.
RESPONSE THE FOLLOWING DAY BY WIRRAL MAGISTRATES COURTS DUTY LEGAL TEAM....
Dear Mrs Davies
Subject: Laying of Information
Your application to institute proceedings via information and the issue of a warrant , cannot proceed to be considered without an indication as to whether the allegations you raise in your letter have been reported to the police for investigation, if they have, please advise what if any action the police took?
I await your reply
yours sincerely
Courts Duty Legal Team
Crime Team
HMCTS
THE COURTS DUTY LEGAL TEAM DID NOT HAVE TO AWAIT OUR REPLY FOR VERY LONG AS THE NEXT DAY THEY WERE GIVEN THE INFORMATION THEY HAD REQUESTED; SEE BELOW.
Dear Sir/madam
On Monday 9th September 2019 I did lay an information at Birkenhead Magistrates Court in relation to the issuance of a warrant to arrest one Mr Adam Speker on serious charges of Fraud and Conspiracy to pervert the course of Justice.
Thank you for your response letter to me today dated 10th September 2019 requesting further information in regards to the matter, this information is detailed below:
On 14th August 2019, I and others did attend a pre booked appointment at Northwich police station in relation to the matter, having four days earlier presented at Northwich police station all the allegations and proof contained therein my laying of information documentation. This was passed to Northwich police legal team in order that they may confirm the validity of the allegations and check the law in relation to such allegations.
On the date of our appointment a young PC was sent to speak with us, he knew nothing of why we were there, and nothing of the typed up information that had been presented at the police station four days prior to our attendance that day.
The officer, a PC Lee did however confirm that the legal team knew of the document delivered. I requested to speak with a senior officer and PC Lee left the room, returning approx. ten minutes later to inform us that senior officer DS Lyons had refused to speak with us! DS Lyons instructed PC Lee to tell us that it was a matter for the bar standards, to which I informed PC Lee that the bar standards hold no authority to arrest Mr Speker on criminal charges and that I had in fact contacted the bar standards on an earlier occasion and that they had confirmed this to be so. PC Lee was adamant that DS Lyons would not speak to us. I requested that as the police legal team had brought no challenge to the allegations and evidence I had presented to them, the charges should be put to the CPS for a charging decision, my request was refused! With the permission of PC Lee, the above conversation was taped by my colleague in the interview room!
Before leaving Northwich police station I requested an incident number which is
IML: 482342
Since that meeting I and others have made numerous attempts to have police arrest and charge Mr Speker on the allegations contained therein my laying of information. I have contacted the Northwich Chief Constable Darren Martland who refuses to engage with me over this matter despite it being an operational issue, and I have contacted Northwich Police Crime Commissioner Paul Crowther who refuses to acknowledge that this is a matter that falls within his remit, he being accountable for the actions/ non actions of the Chief Constables failure to perform his lawful duty. All correspondence was via email which of course I do have as proof of my efforts to have police deal with the matter.
Having exhausted all options available to me, on the 1st September 2019, I emailed the CC and the PCC informing them that if no arrest was made within seven days, and their repeated failure to uphold the law continued then I would en devour to do their job for them and instigate proceedings against Mr Speker myself. They have held me to my word, hence my laying of information which is now with yourself.
I hope I have provided you with all the information you require to now proceed further with the case.
Kind regards
Ms Zelda Davies.
IT HAS NOW BEEN A WEEK SINCE THIS EMAIL WAS SENT TO THE DUTY LEGAL TEAM, TONIGHT BEING 19/09/2019 WE SENT THIS NEXT EMAIL....
Dear Sir /Madam
Nine days ago, on the 09/09/2019 I did Lay an Information at Wirral Magistrates Court, this was in relation to serious fraud and perverting the course of justice, indictable offences triable only within a Crown Court.
In accordance with criminal procedure rules I did Lay this information in the correct manner clearly demonstrating all credibility and merit.
The following day, being the 10/09/2019, I did receive a letter from your legal team informing me that my application to institute proceedings via information and the issuance of a warrant of arrest could not proceed to be considered without an indication as to whether the allegations I raised had been reported to the police for investigation, and if they had to advice you of what action if any the police took.
The following day being 11/09/2019 I did respond via email to the aforementioned letter, I did go into great detail of the lengths I had gone to in order to have the police deal with the matter. Having given you all the information you state prevented you from proceeding further I did expect a speedy response back from you, however that has not been the case and it has now been a full week since I complied with your request for information.
Please advise me on when to expect my laying of Information to proceed.
Kind regards
Mrs Zelda Davies
WILL WIRRAL MAGISTRATES COURT DO THEIR LAWFUL DUTY AND PROCEED AS IS REQUIRED OF THEM? .......WATCH THIS SPACE.
NOW A SECRET FUNERAL
NOW A SECRET CREMATION
was we getting close to the truth and is that why they had to destroy the evidence of murder?
NOW A SECRET CREMATION
was we getting close to the truth and is that why they had to destroy the evidence of murder?
serial killers on police payroll
You will likely be aware of the state employing family members of police officers to go undercover in activist groups in most cases they are created by them by way of deception and its their role not to collect information like of old (facebook handles that) its their role to control the opposition for an example they create Antifa to fight against state controlled Tommy Robinson fan boys. This is to create an illusion of the raise of the so called for right and so called far left, so they can control the narrative and outcome...as David Icke said “Create the problem, wait for the Reaction, then bring in the pre planned Solution”.
You may also be aware of police undercovers/police informants having sex with their subjects and being in long term relationships and having children with them.
But there is a darker side to Undercovers/police informants, in recent times the state has knowingly employed serial killers in their ranks and knowingly protected them from prosecution. We are not talking about your MI6 James Bond characters overseas assassinating the “bad guys”, they where not trained British Solders. We are talking about actual serial killers not trained assassins just sick and evil identities being let lose in our communities with immunity.
The most notorious of these stories come from Ireland where the British state created groups like the UDA UFF and UVF to fight against the Irish Republican Army. In these groups is where they allowed serial killers into their ranks who where not political, had no religious or ideological ideas in who and why they killed.....they simply killed for fun. They where not just killing IRA members but random members of the public who had to live in the same community as these monsters knowing the state was protecting them.
Gary Haggarty was working for the UVF he was also a police informant working for the British state. He was charged with five murders, five attempted murders, one count of aiding and abetting murder, 23 conspiracies to murder, four kidnappings, six charges of false imprisonment, a handful of arson attacks, five hijackings, 66 offences of possession of firearms and ammunition with intent to endanger life which included two Sten submachine guns and an Uzi, 10 counts of possession of explosives, 18 of wounding with intent and two charges of aggravated burglary. There was also criminal damage: just the one charge, although this covered the destruction of several houses during a six month period. One of his victims was left to die after being attacked with a hammer while the victim was handcuffed, he suffered skull fractures, eight broken ribs, two lung punctures, and fractures to one ankle and both wrists.
Freddie Scappaticci whos code name was Stakeknife who was working for the British state undercover and infiltrated the IRA at the highest level for 20 years, he killed over 50 members of the public under the watch of his handlers.
You also have the case of the Shankill Butchers a sick and evil cult of serial killers that killed at least 19 people in Belfast while working for the UVF. With the name Shankill Butchers you can imagine what they did with knifes and the savagery involved which included beheading their victims only a couple of feet away from a Police Station. The British State knew about this cult and turned a blind eye as they terrorised and slaughtered their way through their community, the likely chances are Lenny Murphy and others in that cult was working as police informants hence why the British state turned a blind eye once again.
The British State had 1000's of informants on their pay roll in Ireland and they killed 1000's of people and got away with it.
The connection to Ireland may not seem relevant to you but the person in charge of security in Ireland during those times was Jane Kennedy who is now the Crime Commissioner for Merseyside Police.
But if you want to get closer we can go to Manchester where GMP hired Boom Boom Magoo also known as Stephen McColl, he became a police informant for GMP. He killed Philip Noakes and Michael Doran while being on the pay roll for GMP. Boom Moom Magoo was shipped over from Scotland where he was I am assuming a police informant for Scottish Police, he was also charged with Murder while being in Scotland and was known by the police as gun for hire but this didn't worry GMP. However it is reported that three police forces had turned down his offer to become their informant I am assuming after knowing about his past. GMP helped him to get a job at a local funeral director, until he was sacked and then he fire bombed the owners house
We can look at the case of Raoul Moat who went on a killing spree, murdering two people and shooting two other people. He was arrested 12 times, including conspiracy to murder and assaulting a child prior to that. The thing was during this time he was working for Northumbria Police as a police informant for years. Raoul Moat long friend Brian Moulding, learnt that he was feeding information to the police when he gave evidence to help police prosecute him in a case.
“I have evidence that proves he was a police informer. I learnt he was an informant because it was referred to in the legal papers in my case.”
“I often wondered why he constantly seemed to escape justice whenever he ended up before the courts and that’s when I realised. Given his history and his constantly saying he hated police, you would not believe his past. But it was a front to cover what he was in front of his criminal associates.”
Does the Police hire Serial Killers?...Yes
So who do you think killed Bob (Robert Pickthall)
You will likely be aware of the state employing family members of police officers to go undercover in activist groups in most cases they are created by them by way of deception and its their role not to collect information like of old (facebook handles that) its their role to control the opposition for an example they create Antifa to fight against state controlled Tommy Robinson fan boys. This is to create an illusion of the raise of the so called for right and so called far left, so they can control the narrative and outcome...as David Icke said “Create the problem, wait for the Reaction, then bring in the pre planned Solution”.
You may also be aware of police undercovers/police informants having sex with their subjects and being in long term relationships and having children with them.
But there is a darker side to Undercovers/police informants, in recent times the state has knowingly employed serial killers in their ranks and knowingly protected them from prosecution. We are not talking about your MI6 James Bond characters overseas assassinating the “bad guys”, they where not trained British Solders. We are talking about actual serial killers not trained assassins just sick and evil identities being let lose in our communities with immunity.
The most notorious of these stories come from Ireland where the British state created groups like the UDA UFF and UVF to fight against the Irish Republican Army. In these groups is where they allowed serial killers into their ranks who where not political, had no religious or ideological ideas in who and why they killed.....they simply killed for fun. They where not just killing IRA members but random members of the public who had to live in the same community as these monsters knowing the state was protecting them.
Gary Haggarty was working for the UVF he was also a police informant working for the British state. He was charged with five murders, five attempted murders, one count of aiding and abetting murder, 23 conspiracies to murder, four kidnappings, six charges of false imprisonment, a handful of arson attacks, five hijackings, 66 offences of possession of firearms and ammunition with intent to endanger life which included two Sten submachine guns and an Uzi, 10 counts of possession of explosives, 18 of wounding with intent and two charges of aggravated burglary. There was also criminal damage: just the one charge, although this covered the destruction of several houses during a six month period. One of his victims was left to die after being attacked with a hammer while the victim was handcuffed, he suffered skull fractures, eight broken ribs, two lung punctures, and fractures to one ankle and both wrists.
Freddie Scappaticci whos code name was Stakeknife who was working for the British state undercover and infiltrated the IRA at the highest level for 20 years, he killed over 50 members of the public under the watch of his handlers.
You also have the case of the Shankill Butchers a sick and evil cult of serial killers that killed at least 19 people in Belfast while working for the UVF. With the name Shankill Butchers you can imagine what they did with knifes and the savagery involved which included beheading their victims only a couple of feet away from a Police Station. The British State knew about this cult and turned a blind eye as they terrorised and slaughtered their way through their community, the likely chances are Lenny Murphy and others in that cult was working as police informants hence why the British state turned a blind eye once again.
The British State had 1000's of informants on their pay roll in Ireland and they killed 1000's of people and got away with it.
The connection to Ireland may not seem relevant to you but the person in charge of security in Ireland during those times was Jane Kennedy who is now the Crime Commissioner for Merseyside Police.
But if you want to get closer we can go to Manchester where GMP hired Boom Boom Magoo also known as Stephen McColl, he became a police informant for GMP. He killed Philip Noakes and Michael Doran while being on the pay roll for GMP. Boom Moom Magoo was shipped over from Scotland where he was I am assuming a police informant for Scottish Police, he was also charged with Murder while being in Scotland and was known by the police as gun for hire but this didn't worry GMP. However it is reported that three police forces had turned down his offer to become their informant I am assuming after knowing about his past. GMP helped him to get a job at a local funeral director, until he was sacked and then he fire bombed the owners house
We can look at the case of Raoul Moat who went on a killing spree, murdering two people and shooting two other people. He was arrested 12 times, including conspiracy to murder and assaulting a child prior to that. The thing was during this time he was working for Northumbria Police as a police informant for years. Raoul Moat long friend Brian Moulding, learnt that he was feeding information to the police when he gave evidence to help police prosecute him in a case.
“I have evidence that proves he was a police informer. I learnt he was an informant because it was referred to in the legal papers in my case.”
“I often wondered why he constantly seemed to escape justice whenever he ended up before the courts and that’s when I realised. Given his history and his constantly saying he hated police, you would not believe his past. But it was a front to cover what he was in front of his criminal associates.”
Does the Police hire Serial Killers?...Yes
So who do you think killed Bob (Robert Pickthall)
In the past 5 years there have been 1,381 "suicides" on our tracks. Apparently they dont record Murders or murder attempts, they do have a classification called "unlawful deaths" there was 9 of these recorded in the past 5 years.
HOW MANY OF THESE "SUICIDES" ARE MURDERS
This shows how BTP are unfit to investigate Murder since they only investigate 2 "unlawful deaths" which could be murders per year.
IT IS TOTAL BULLSHIT THAT 1,381 PEOPLE KILLED THEMSELVES IN THE PAST 5 YEARS as we have proven its far too easy to dump a body on the tracks and get away with murder just like what they are attempting to do with Bob
HOW MANY OF THESE "SUICIDES" ARE MURDERS
This shows how BTP are unfit to investigate Murder since they only investigate 2 "unlawful deaths" which could be murders per year.
IT IS TOTAL BULLSHIT THAT 1,381 PEOPLE KILLED THEMSELVES IN THE PAST 5 YEARS as we have proven its far too easy to dump a body on the tracks and get away with murder just like what they are attempting to do with Bob
2 days after an email was sent to 20+ Officers involved in the case of Bob and not a single reply back.
Why are they ignoring the Legal NOK, Legal Agent acting on behalf of Bob, his Friends & Family. Why are they refusing to investigate this case? We know for a fact there was CCTV and we know for a FACT one camera was pointing at the potential crime scene, if this was a "suicide" there would not be a conspiracy and as you have seen on our Facebook wall we have provided concrete evidence that Bob was killed, his assets stolen and a cover up engineered and orchestrated by Cheshire and BTP police forces.
We know for a FACT Bob was surrounded by more then one government agent, the question is..... did they Kill Bob and is this the main reason for this conspiracy to cover it up?
" Hi,
I would like to make you aware of a death reported on the 31st July 2019 regarding a man called Robert Pickthall, he was killed at Acton Bridge Railway station on the night of the 30th July 2019 in Cheshire. The BTP officers that have been assigned to the investigation are making a mockery of this very serious incident, their lack of interest in collecting intelligence and their responses to members of the public including the NOK xxxxxxxx and legal agent acting on Bobs behalf is shocking to say the least. This is Operational Matter an ongoing live investigation and therefore your response is urgent,
Robert Pickthall has been clearly murdered in a way to make it look like a suicide and this would be proven if BTP officers did their job, instead they have been allowed a potential prime suspect to be the NOK xxxxxxxxx despite any documentation being provided, all of Bobs friends and neighbours would testify that he did not have a partner and xxxxx was never his partner. BTP officers did some investigation they would find out that Bob had told numerous people that he was not interested in a relationship with her, I find it shocking that BTP officers failed to ask any question before handing over Bob assets and even his body to a potential prime suspect in the murder of Bob. Xxxxxxx never once called herself the Partner until after Bob had died, you will find no one to support her narrative because it is a lie. Xxxxxxxx the only real NOK who has a legal document written in Bobs own handwriting and BTP officers are ignoring a legal document, his blood relatives such as his sister xxxxxx Pickthall and daughter xxxx Pickthall are also being pushed aside.
The failure to contact his family is disturbing despite a simple name search on xxxxxx would have found his sister xxxx and daughter xxxxxall living in Northwich, I believe the fake NOK xxxxx told BTP officers that he had no family in the country. For his family to find out on facebook that he died in this type of way is horrific, I would like to know why your officers refused to release his name in order to find his blood relatives and possible witness to incident. If it was not for his friends and the legal NOK his body would have been cremated and his family would not even have been aware that he was even dead, It seems careless or malicious to me. Bobs family attempted to meet xxxxxx over the weekend and I believe xxxxxxx called it off, is this someone who has any respect for his family.
The day Bob died it is reported that xxxxxx went to the solicitors all the way to Liverpool, she informed his friend and Neighbour xxxxxxx that she was moving into Bobs place. Its also be reported that she has taken all of his money and assets despite numerous members of the public informing BTP that he did not have a partner. Why is no one investigating this very obvious motive of murder, why is her xxxxx not being interviewed. She told Bob friends that she did not want any information to be released on facebook till her xxxxxxxxxxx was informed about Bobs death, this seemed to have been a delay tactic so the information could not be put out their in case the blood relatives of Bobs got in touch, its been very clearly that she wanted the Body cremated ASAP and if it wasnt for his friends and members of the public then this vital piece of evidence would have been destroyed. By indicating that her xxxxxxx was away also gives the illusion of an alibi does it not. Why are your officers not taking a sensible and practical approach to this case and why are they not challenging bureaucracy as stated in your Value statement. Why is xxxxx xxx not being questioned?
i would like to make you aware that the rail line company London Northwestern Rail who are responsible for Acton Bridge railway station have confirmed to me in two recorded phone calls which i can provide that there was no reports of anyone being hit by a train or any fatalities caused by impact of a train. They also said that there was no disruption to their railway lines in regard to to this incident, this is very surprising when their should have been an investigation at the scene to collect and preserve evidence.
I phoned up the Railway customer relations line and there was nothing on the railway control records, they did a none search for Acton Bridge, Acton Bridge search and searched railway logs, the railway customer relation officer even attempted to do a Google search. This phone call was repeated the next day with a different customer relation officer and the search was extended to the 30th July and the 1st of August with the same results.
I do not believe Bob was killed by an impact of a train, i do not believe he jumped/walked in front of a train. This was murder made to look like a suicide. If Bob was hit by a train then he was already dead before the impact of the train, his body could have been on the tracks hidden to the side and the driver of the train was not aware of him.
If it was dark and the train was at high speed the drive may not have seen or heard any impact, especially if it’s a ‘glancing’ blow, or the person is laid down already (which is body would be if he was killed and his body placed on the tracks).
The train should have stood down and moved to a depot for inspection once cleared by BTP, I would like to know if this was the case and if any forensic investigation took place . If the body was found on the tracks without any knowledge of a train driver being involved , they would have to have worked backwards and find the potential responsible units and get them visually inspected at the next opportunity, was this the case.
Sometime after the death XXXXXXX told his friends that she was at Bobs house when the allegedly took a tact to the station at around 2150 and she somehow knew he was on the tracks at 2215. How could someone allow their alleged partner to commit an alleged suicide like this, she then was awaken by a welfare call from the police, later that day she was in the solicitors in Liverpool. This is not someone who is grieving over a loved one loss. XXXXXX has also told Bobs friends that she got an email off Bob and she jumped in her car in a rush to save him, but she never reported him missing to the police at the time. There are screenshots and chats saved proving these statements are true. Alan XXXXX can confirm on hours before Bob died Bob had told him that XXXXXX was staying that nigh, i think it would be a good question ask why.
His friend Alan XXXXX phone Bobs Mobile Phone and she was disrespectful to Alan and told him to stop calling because Bob was dead. Bob was speaking to Alan via Wasapp 2 hours or so before his body was found and he was joking with Alan and in good spirits he even informed Alan what to do when and if the possibility that he was sent to prison on the 31st of July giving Alan the authority to act on his behalf excluding financial matters on the possibility that he could be sent to prison. This proves forward planing and proves that Bob changed his mind about suicide. It is also reported that Bob was with friends on the 30th July I believe one of those friends was called Tony and they did their weekly shopping in Iceland, this once again shows that Bob had no interest in ending his life that night especially with the news from the ICO supporting him get vital documents off the Council which would prove without any shadow of doubt he was wrongfully charges, sentenced and victimised by the Council for years which would have resulted in a multi million pound compensation claim.
I find it shocking that your officers did not take Bobs mobile phone and laptop for evidence, I am also shocked that you have allowed a potential suspect to have free access to his home and assets destroying and tampering with evidence at will. If this death took place at his home then, this whole investigation would look very different but because its happened at a railway station your officers are under the impression that they do not need to investigate its incompetence and malfeasances or just lazy policing.
Was there any CCTV requests made by BTP because there was CCTV at Acton Bridge railway station and BTP officers not to look for such material once again shows the lack of interest your officers have in investigating this case of Murder, why was there no appeals for information. I am aware BTP officer when into the pub The Hazel Pear and saw their CCTV but once again failed to inform anyone at the pub that Bob had died. We spoke to the owner and once again it was us that broke the news it was indeed Bob that had died, he was a regular at the pub where he eat. There has been no determination by BTP officers to investigate this murder, they have not strived to achieve the best results for the public or served the community, which goes against your Value statement.
We put up flowers and cards at Acton Bridge Railway station and we have people coming forward asking question who knows if one of them witnessed anything, how many witnesses have been losed because BTP officers failed to inform the public of his death breaking, how this a best results for the public. We visited the prime crime scene and i would like to know why you have not preserved it, why you have not put out an appeal for information. It appears that you have simply collected the body and done no forensic investigations. There was a red pen at the prime crime scene on the tracks and if you did some investigation you would know that pen came from a Manchester restaurant, if you did more investigation you would find out that Bob had been to Manchester on the 22nd of July a few days before his murder, if you did more investigations you would find out you can get a train from Manchester to Acton Bridge Station. You need to contact Rosso Restaurant in Manchester and see if he was with someone. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
If you study the James Bulger murder, it shows how murder does take place on the railway tracks and how the train on the railway is used to destroy evidence and give the illusion that the murder was suicide therefore no criminal investigation has to take place because suicide is not a criminal offence. just like the case of James Bulger this case is a very unusual and should be treated as suspicious. BTP officers need to take this case of Murder, theft, fraud and modern day body snatching seriously and stop making this into a joke, a man has lost his life, friends have lost a good friend, his neighbour has lost a good neighbour, his daughter has lost a father and his sister has lost a brother. Below is just an example of the incompetence and malfeasances in public office by BTP officers during this so called investigation not to mention what I have already written above.
I emailed a T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson 4272 from Liverpool CID and his response to me offering intelligence and information regarding the case of Bob was shocking, he mocked the idea of a possible murder despite clearly not being away of many if any facts. i offered to meet him in person at Northwich Police Station because I was already booked in that day to see an officer from Cheshire police regarding the fraud and theft relating to Adam Speker on the run up to Bob death. I thought T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson wanted to meet in person because he told me he did not want to discuss this case via email, he then T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson the meeting and told me I would not be meeting him.
I had been trying for weeks to get hold of someone to collect statements off persons of interest, I became aware of an email T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson sent to Alan XXXXXX and i suggested that he emailed back Alan XXXX and rephrase his question instead of asking for "material ref to acton bridge " he should be asking to collect statements about Bob and the events that led up to his death because i believe Alan has missunderstood the question which has been poorly written. Alan is vital to the investigation as he was the last person to speak to him alive on that day, he is also vital to the investigation because he would prove that these "Suicide letters" where in fact written weeks before he died saved in his draft email account to then be used as a cover for murder . I know this because he sent them out weeks ago, Alan received the email and went mad at Bob for even suggesting the idea of suicide. They both came to the conclusion and full understanding that suicide was not on the table.
I told T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson to contact the NOK, the only person who is legally qualified to be the NOK XXXXXX, her number is XXXXXX or email her at XXXXXXX and he never did.
T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson then threatened me with some type of time deadline and if I never responded in that time frame then I would be excluded from the case and none of my evidence and intelligence would be accepted by him. He then went on my Facebook page and emailed me saying he knows what I am posting on facebook, why is he not interested in solving this case. He is more interested in his bruised ego, he has shown no Integrity no respect and demonstrating n understanding of how to carry out an investigation.
This was not Suicide hours before he died he gave Alan the legal power of acting agent on his behalf because he was expected to be jailed. He wrote those "suicide" letters and saved them on his website email account in case he where to die in prison due to ill health or be killed, they where NOT SUICIDE LETTERS! these so called suicide letters where not suicide letters they where written for the purpose of his time in prison if he where to die in prison due to ill health or be killed, why has his laptop not been looked at, why did the officers refused to collect his mobile phone which would have had his last communication on. Why do these so called suicide letters seem to be being sent to Bobs other email address from robert_pickthall@aol.co.uk to bloodhound24@europe.com. When was his lap top handed over to BTP from the fake NOK?
There is no clearly evidence to support the theory of suicide and therefore BTP should not be assuming suicide. This case from the start should have been treated as suspicious because Bob was not killed by impact of a train. BTP should be investigating Murder and if BTP officers did their job correctly they would have captured the killers on CCTV from Acton Bridge Rail Station, why has this vital pieace of evidence not been processed. Bob was in fit state of mind on the night he was killed, he was not suffering from any psychological distress and was planning to continue the fight in jail which may I point out he could have won that court case because based on the fact that no evidence was presented have been presented against Bob the odds are with Bob...Especially when the ICO backed his decision that the Council have to hand of the made up evidence against him.
Bob had made plans for Alan xxxxx to deal with his affairs why being imprisoned excluding his finances. These all proves forward thinking and was not planning on killing himself. He was in the process of a possible multi million pound compensation claim against the council/police/moj/barristers, judges and media outlets. He was on the verge of signing a multi million pound movie contact with Lionsgate, he met representatives from that company in London with expenses paid for by Lionsgate.
Why did BTP officers tell the fake NOK xxxxxxx to delete her facebook page? there are so many question and not a single BTP officer is responding in fact they are telling people that they will not be responded to. How can this be an investigation if no one is being spoken too?
There has been NO INVESTIGATION into the Bobs case and this cover up has to stop, alls we want to know is who killed Bob and the fake NOK charged with fraud, theft, perverting the course of justice and possible conspiracy to murder. Not one single officer has shown any interest at all in investigating this case and its becoming very obvious that the police are complicit in this conspiracy why else would they behaving in this manner.
Why hasn't no one been questioned? You have a suspect xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. WHY IS THAT.
Why isnt xxxxxxx who is connected to xxxxxx not being questioned, he is xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x xxxx xxx together. xxxxxx was with xxxxxx xxxx x xxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx x
WHY WAS IT THAT xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxx x, MAYBE TO HIDE THEIR TRACKS.
There is no doubt that this is a conspiracy so why is no one being questioned who could be part of the conspiracy, why is it that not a single police officer is asking anyone any questions? Why till this day there has been no appeal for information or his death made public.
This was not suicide, there is too much unusual circumstances surrounding his death including the fact that it appears he was not killed by a train impact, his body was long dead before if any train came in contact with him. Please investigate my concerns and matters, help bring some integrity to this clown show of an investigation.
This case will not go away and neither will me or the people who loved Bob until one way or another justice is served. Please refer to Justice Watch Facebook page as we continue to upload evidence regarding this case @JusticeWatchMerseyside
thanks
David "
Why are they ignoring the Legal NOK, Legal Agent acting on behalf of Bob, his Friends & Family. Why are they refusing to investigate this case? We know for a fact there was CCTV and we know for a FACT one camera was pointing at the potential crime scene, if this was a "suicide" there would not be a conspiracy and as you have seen on our Facebook wall we have provided concrete evidence that Bob was killed, his assets stolen and a cover up engineered and orchestrated by Cheshire and BTP police forces.
We know for a FACT Bob was surrounded by more then one government agent, the question is..... did they Kill Bob and is this the main reason for this conspiracy to cover it up?
" Hi,
I would like to make you aware of a death reported on the 31st July 2019 regarding a man called Robert Pickthall, he was killed at Acton Bridge Railway station on the night of the 30th July 2019 in Cheshire. The BTP officers that have been assigned to the investigation are making a mockery of this very serious incident, their lack of interest in collecting intelligence and their responses to members of the public including the NOK xxxxxxxx and legal agent acting on Bobs behalf is shocking to say the least. This is Operational Matter an ongoing live investigation and therefore your response is urgent,
Robert Pickthall has been clearly murdered in a way to make it look like a suicide and this would be proven if BTP officers did their job, instead they have been allowed a potential prime suspect to be the NOK xxxxxxxxx despite any documentation being provided, all of Bobs friends and neighbours would testify that he did not have a partner and xxxxx was never his partner. BTP officers did some investigation they would find out that Bob had told numerous people that he was not interested in a relationship with her, I find it shocking that BTP officers failed to ask any question before handing over Bob assets and even his body to a potential prime suspect in the murder of Bob. Xxxxxxx never once called herself the Partner until after Bob had died, you will find no one to support her narrative because it is a lie. Xxxxxxxx the only real NOK who has a legal document written in Bobs own handwriting and BTP officers are ignoring a legal document, his blood relatives such as his sister xxxxxx Pickthall and daughter xxxx Pickthall are also being pushed aside.
The failure to contact his family is disturbing despite a simple name search on xxxxxx would have found his sister xxxx and daughter xxxxxall living in Northwich, I believe the fake NOK xxxxx told BTP officers that he had no family in the country. For his family to find out on facebook that he died in this type of way is horrific, I would like to know why your officers refused to release his name in order to find his blood relatives and possible witness to incident. If it was not for his friends and the legal NOK his body would have been cremated and his family would not even have been aware that he was even dead, It seems careless or malicious to me. Bobs family attempted to meet xxxxxx over the weekend and I believe xxxxxxx called it off, is this someone who has any respect for his family.
The day Bob died it is reported that xxxxxx went to the solicitors all the way to Liverpool, she informed his friend and Neighbour xxxxxxx that she was moving into Bobs place. Its also be reported that she has taken all of his money and assets despite numerous members of the public informing BTP that he did not have a partner. Why is no one investigating this very obvious motive of murder, why is her xxxxx not being interviewed. She told Bob friends that she did not want any information to be released on facebook till her xxxxxxxxxxx was informed about Bobs death, this seemed to have been a delay tactic so the information could not be put out their in case the blood relatives of Bobs got in touch, its been very clearly that she wanted the Body cremated ASAP and if it wasnt for his friends and members of the public then this vital piece of evidence would have been destroyed. By indicating that her xxxxxxx was away also gives the illusion of an alibi does it not. Why are your officers not taking a sensible and practical approach to this case and why are they not challenging bureaucracy as stated in your Value statement. Why is xxxxx xxx not being questioned?
i would like to make you aware that the rail line company London Northwestern Rail who are responsible for Acton Bridge railway station have confirmed to me in two recorded phone calls which i can provide that there was no reports of anyone being hit by a train or any fatalities caused by impact of a train. They also said that there was no disruption to their railway lines in regard to to this incident, this is very surprising when their should have been an investigation at the scene to collect and preserve evidence.
I phoned up the Railway customer relations line and there was nothing on the railway control records, they did a none search for Acton Bridge, Acton Bridge search and searched railway logs, the railway customer relation officer even attempted to do a Google search. This phone call was repeated the next day with a different customer relation officer and the search was extended to the 30th July and the 1st of August with the same results.
I do not believe Bob was killed by an impact of a train, i do not believe he jumped/walked in front of a train. This was murder made to look like a suicide. If Bob was hit by a train then he was already dead before the impact of the train, his body could have been on the tracks hidden to the side and the driver of the train was not aware of him.
If it was dark and the train was at high speed the drive may not have seen or heard any impact, especially if it’s a ‘glancing’ blow, or the person is laid down already (which is body would be if he was killed and his body placed on the tracks).
The train should have stood down and moved to a depot for inspection once cleared by BTP, I would like to know if this was the case and if any forensic investigation took place . If the body was found on the tracks without any knowledge of a train driver being involved , they would have to have worked backwards and find the potential responsible units and get them visually inspected at the next opportunity, was this the case.
Sometime after the death XXXXXXX told his friends that she was at Bobs house when the allegedly took a tact to the station at around 2150 and she somehow knew he was on the tracks at 2215. How could someone allow their alleged partner to commit an alleged suicide like this, she then was awaken by a welfare call from the police, later that day she was in the solicitors in Liverpool. This is not someone who is grieving over a loved one loss. XXXXXX has also told Bobs friends that she got an email off Bob and she jumped in her car in a rush to save him, but she never reported him missing to the police at the time. There are screenshots and chats saved proving these statements are true. Alan XXXXX can confirm on hours before Bob died Bob had told him that XXXXXX was staying that nigh, i think it would be a good question ask why.
His friend Alan XXXXX phone Bobs Mobile Phone and she was disrespectful to Alan and told him to stop calling because Bob was dead. Bob was speaking to Alan via Wasapp 2 hours or so before his body was found and he was joking with Alan and in good spirits he even informed Alan what to do when and if the possibility that he was sent to prison on the 31st of July giving Alan the authority to act on his behalf excluding financial matters on the possibility that he could be sent to prison. This proves forward planing and proves that Bob changed his mind about suicide. It is also reported that Bob was with friends on the 30th July I believe one of those friends was called Tony and they did their weekly shopping in Iceland, this once again shows that Bob had no interest in ending his life that night especially with the news from the ICO supporting him get vital documents off the Council which would prove without any shadow of doubt he was wrongfully charges, sentenced and victimised by the Council for years which would have resulted in a multi million pound compensation claim.
I find it shocking that your officers did not take Bobs mobile phone and laptop for evidence, I am also shocked that you have allowed a potential suspect to have free access to his home and assets destroying and tampering with evidence at will. If this death took place at his home then, this whole investigation would look very different but because its happened at a railway station your officers are under the impression that they do not need to investigate its incompetence and malfeasances or just lazy policing.
Was there any CCTV requests made by BTP because there was CCTV at Acton Bridge railway station and BTP officers not to look for such material once again shows the lack of interest your officers have in investigating this case of Murder, why was there no appeals for information. I am aware BTP officer when into the pub The Hazel Pear and saw their CCTV but once again failed to inform anyone at the pub that Bob had died. We spoke to the owner and once again it was us that broke the news it was indeed Bob that had died, he was a regular at the pub where he eat. There has been no determination by BTP officers to investigate this murder, they have not strived to achieve the best results for the public or served the community, which goes against your Value statement.
We put up flowers and cards at Acton Bridge Railway station and we have people coming forward asking question who knows if one of them witnessed anything, how many witnesses have been losed because BTP officers failed to inform the public of his death breaking, how this a best results for the public. We visited the prime crime scene and i would like to know why you have not preserved it, why you have not put out an appeal for information. It appears that you have simply collected the body and done no forensic investigations. There was a red pen at the prime crime scene on the tracks and if you did some investigation you would know that pen came from a Manchester restaurant, if you did more investigation you would find out that Bob had been to Manchester on the 22nd of July a few days before his murder, if you did more investigations you would find out you can get a train from Manchester to Acton Bridge Station. You need to contact Rosso Restaurant in Manchester and see if he was with someone. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
If you study the James Bulger murder, it shows how murder does take place on the railway tracks and how the train on the railway is used to destroy evidence and give the illusion that the murder was suicide therefore no criminal investigation has to take place because suicide is not a criminal offence. just like the case of James Bulger this case is a very unusual and should be treated as suspicious. BTP officers need to take this case of Murder, theft, fraud and modern day body snatching seriously and stop making this into a joke, a man has lost his life, friends have lost a good friend, his neighbour has lost a good neighbour, his daughter has lost a father and his sister has lost a brother. Below is just an example of the incompetence and malfeasances in public office by BTP officers during this so called investigation not to mention what I have already written above.
I emailed a T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson 4272 from Liverpool CID and his response to me offering intelligence and information regarding the case of Bob was shocking, he mocked the idea of a possible murder despite clearly not being away of many if any facts. i offered to meet him in person at Northwich Police Station because I was already booked in that day to see an officer from Cheshire police regarding the fraud and theft relating to Adam Speker on the run up to Bob death. I thought T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson wanted to meet in person because he told me he did not want to discuss this case via email, he then T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson the meeting and told me I would not be meeting him.
I had been trying for weeks to get hold of someone to collect statements off persons of interest, I became aware of an email T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson sent to Alan XXXXXX and i suggested that he emailed back Alan XXXX and rephrase his question instead of asking for "material ref to acton bridge " he should be asking to collect statements about Bob and the events that led up to his death because i believe Alan has missunderstood the question which has been poorly written. Alan is vital to the investigation as he was the last person to speak to him alive on that day, he is also vital to the investigation because he would prove that these "Suicide letters" where in fact written weeks before he died saved in his draft email account to then be used as a cover for murder . I know this because he sent them out weeks ago, Alan received the email and went mad at Bob for even suggesting the idea of suicide. They both came to the conclusion and full understanding that suicide was not on the table.
I told T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson to contact the NOK, the only person who is legally qualified to be the NOK XXXXXX, her number is XXXXXX or email her at XXXXXXX and he never did.
T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson then threatened me with some type of time deadline and if I never responded in that time frame then I would be excluded from the case and none of my evidence and intelligence would be accepted by him. He then went on my Facebook page and emailed me saying he knows what I am posting on facebook, why is he not interested in solving this case. He is more interested in his bruised ego, he has shown no Integrity no respect and demonstrating n understanding of how to carry out an investigation.
This was not Suicide hours before he died he gave Alan the legal power of acting agent on his behalf because he was expected to be jailed. He wrote those "suicide" letters and saved them on his website email account in case he where to die in prison due to ill health or be killed, they where NOT SUICIDE LETTERS! these so called suicide letters where not suicide letters they where written for the purpose of his time in prison if he where to die in prison due to ill health or be killed, why has his laptop not been looked at, why did the officers refused to collect his mobile phone which would have had his last communication on. Why do these so called suicide letters seem to be being sent to Bobs other email address from robert_pickthall@aol.co.uk to bloodhound24@europe.com. When was his lap top handed over to BTP from the fake NOK?
There is no clearly evidence to support the theory of suicide and therefore BTP should not be assuming suicide. This case from the start should have been treated as suspicious because Bob was not killed by impact of a train. BTP should be investigating Murder and if BTP officers did their job correctly they would have captured the killers on CCTV from Acton Bridge Rail Station, why has this vital pieace of evidence not been processed. Bob was in fit state of mind on the night he was killed, he was not suffering from any psychological distress and was planning to continue the fight in jail which may I point out he could have won that court case because based on the fact that no evidence was presented have been presented against Bob the odds are with Bob...Especially when the ICO backed his decision that the Council have to hand of the made up evidence against him.
Bob had made plans for Alan xxxxx to deal with his affairs why being imprisoned excluding his finances. These all proves forward thinking and was not planning on killing himself. He was in the process of a possible multi million pound compensation claim against the council/police/moj/barristers, judges and media outlets. He was on the verge of signing a multi million pound movie contact with Lionsgate, he met representatives from that company in London with expenses paid for by Lionsgate.
Why did BTP officers tell the fake NOK xxxxxxx to delete her facebook page? there are so many question and not a single BTP officer is responding in fact they are telling people that they will not be responded to. How can this be an investigation if no one is being spoken too?
There has been NO INVESTIGATION into the Bobs case and this cover up has to stop, alls we want to know is who killed Bob and the fake NOK charged with fraud, theft, perverting the course of justice and possible conspiracy to murder. Not one single officer has shown any interest at all in investigating this case and its becoming very obvious that the police are complicit in this conspiracy why else would they behaving in this manner.
Why hasn't no one been questioned? You have a suspect xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. WHY IS THAT.
Why isnt xxxxxxx who is connected to xxxxxx not being questioned, he is xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x xxxx xxx together. xxxxxx was with xxxxxx xxxx x xxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx x
WHY WAS IT THAT xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxx x, MAYBE TO HIDE THEIR TRACKS.
There is no doubt that this is a conspiracy so why is no one being questioned who could be part of the conspiracy, why is it that not a single police officer is asking anyone any questions? Why till this day there has been no appeal for information or his death made public.
This was not suicide, there is too much unusual circumstances surrounding his death including the fact that it appears he was not killed by a train impact, his body was long dead before if any train came in contact with him. Please investigate my concerns and matters, help bring some integrity to this clown show of an investigation.
This case will not go away and neither will me or the people who loved Bob until one way or another justice is served. Please refer to Justice Watch Facebook page as we continue to upload evidence regarding this case @JusticeWatchMerseyside
thanks
David "
With Mersseyside Police spending over £360,000 tax payers money on “Covert Human Intelligence” in the past 5 year, the Police as whole spending £25,268,798.40 tax payers money to informants in five years, with the UK tax authorities paying £605,000 to informants in one year, with GCHQ requiting new snitches with a starting salary of £26,743 - £39,121 plus relevant skills payments dependent on role and capability (like Murder), with MI6 looking to recruit new spys who all need practical field training is it beyond the possibility that the Killers who killed Bob was working for the state?
It is well known that hundreds of off duty police officers are being paid millions by businesses and councils creating a two-tier service and opening the door up to corruption, who is it to say that CWAC did not pay off duty police officers to not only infiltrate Bob but possibly kill him. Would this explain their refusal to investigate this murder?
It is well reported that Sntiches (Police informants, police undercovers) have and are having sex with their targets and even having babies with those targets. The best way to infiltrate an activist group as a police informant is to have a sexual “romantic” relationship with that target. Its the easiest why to emotionally manipulate that person and the Snitch will automatically be accepted by that targeted group because that person gives the Snitch a false credibility by vouching for that Snitch.
The case of Stephen Lawrence who was killed by a racist group of cowards, the police instead of investigating the murder they covered it up. The Met hired at least 3 police officers to go undercover and spy on the family to get dirt on them in an attempt to slander them in the media. They even rented out a house behind the Lawrences family back garden in order to spy on them. The levels of sickness that these actors will go to have no limits,
Is it possible that the Police appointed the fake NOK on purpose ignoring legal documentation to cover up the murder because she is on the pay roll of the state? It is reported that the fake NOK met Bob “randomly” at a bakery where she approached Bob and shown an interest in his website which was exposing serious corrupting in CWAC, she then stalked and harassed Bob for a year or 2. She constantly attempted to get him into a romantic relationship with him but he was not interested in her in that way or any type of relationship like that, he was married to his work exposing corruption. They apparently had falling outs over this matter because Bob was not interested in getting into a relationship with her. He made comments to friends that he did not trust her and his friends made similar comments to him.
Is it not strange that on the night Bob was killed that the fake NOK manipulated Bob into allowing her to stay over night at his place? Bob female friends have also stayed over at his place in the past and there was never a sexual or romantic relationship involvement, he just offered his couch out of good hospitality. The Police seem to think because the fake NOK opened the door to Bobs place the morning after he was killed this somehow classifies herself as the NOK.
For the police not to ask for documents or evidence proving that she was the NOK is strange but this allowed her to roam Bobs house not only looting the place but hiding and destroying evidence of a possible murder. She willingly handed over Bobs computer with passwords to the Police, the same police that arm raided him on false pretenses. The police also allowed her to keep Bobs mobile phone which was also strange. She was the first person to start promoting the “suicide theory” despite knowing full well what happened, she was so keen to get the body cremated which would hide the evidence showing how Bob was killed because we know it was not by impact of a train. She has gave alternative stories about where she was and what she did in the lead up to Bobs murder and days after his murder. She was the one who wanted to keep Bobs death quiet refusing to contact the papers and manipulating Bobs friends not to post anything online.
As we have reported on our page many of our Admins are under illegal police surveillance, Bob was also connected to our page. How many government agents had or attempted to infiltrate Bobs small circle?
Is it possible that Bob was killed by a government agent and this is the reason why the police are refusing to investigate murder, fraud, theft, body snatching, perverting the course of justice and enterprise to Murder?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38902480
https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/police-informants-paid-more-360000-9446581
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2343764/Police-forces-pay-25million-informants-nearly-half-spent-London-s-Met.html#ixzz4SW1p0LtP
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8383313/gchq-drive-young-women-intelligence-agents-global-cyber-threats/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/hundreds-of-police-paid-for-by-businesses-parish-councils-and-locals-a6795186.html
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/uk-news/spy-agency-gchq-recruiting-jobs-16110304
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-security-idUKKCN11S0HN
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/17/stephen-lawrence-police-officer-allegedly-spied-family-identified-david-hagan
It is well known that hundreds of off duty police officers are being paid millions by businesses and councils creating a two-tier service and opening the door up to corruption, who is it to say that CWAC did not pay off duty police officers to not only infiltrate Bob but possibly kill him. Would this explain their refusal to investigate this murder?
It is well reported that Sntiches (Police informants, police undercovers) have and are having sex with their targets and even having babies with those targets. The best way to infiltrate an activist group as a police informant is to have a sexual “romantic” relationship with that target. Its the easiest why to emotionally manipulate that person and the Snitch will automatically be accepted by that targeted group because that person gives the Snitch a false credibility by vouching for that Snitch.
The case of Stephen Lawrence who was killed by a racist group of cowards, the police instead of investigating the murder they covered it up. The Met hired at least 3 police officers to go undercover and spy on the family to get dirt on them in an attempt to slander them in the media. They even rented out a house behind the Lawrences family back garden in order to spy on them. The levels of sickness that these actors will go to have no limits,
Is it possible that the Police appointed the fake NOK on purpose ignoring legal documentation to cover up the murder because she is on the pay roll of the state? It is reported that the fake NOK met Bob “randomly” at a bakery where she approached Bob and shown an interest in his website which was exposing serious corrupting in CWAC, she then stalked and harassed Bob for a year or 2. She constantly attempted to get him into a romantic relationship with him but he was not interested in her in that way or any type of relationship like that, he was married to his work exposing corruption. They apparently had falling outs over this matter because Bob was not interested in getting into a relationship with her. He made comments to friends that he did not trust her and his friends made similar comments to him.
Is it not strange that on the night Bob was killed that the fake NOK manipulated Bob into allowing her to stay over night at his place? Bob female friends have also stayed over at his place in the past and there was never a sexual or romantic relationship involvement, he just offered his couch out of good hospitality. The Police seem to think because the fake NOK opened the door to Bobs place the morning after he was killed this somehow classifies herself as the NOK.
For the police not to ask for documents or evidence proving that she was the NOK is strange but this allowed her to roam Bobs house not only looting the place but hiding and destroying evidence of a possible murder. She willingly handed over Bobs computer with passwords to the Police, the same police that arm raided him on false pretenses. The police also allowed her to keep Bobs mobile phone which was also strange. She was the first person to start promoting the “suicide theory” despite knowing full well what happened, she was so keen to get the body cremated which would hide the evidence showing how Bob was killed because we know it was not by impact of a train. She has gave alternative stories about where she was and what she did in the lead up to Bobs murder and days after his murder. She was the one who wanted to keep Bobs death quiet refusing to contact the papers and manipulating Bobs friends not to post anything online.
As we have reported on our page many of our Admins are under illegal police surveillance, Bob was also connected to our page. How many government agents had or attempted to infiltrate Bobs small circle?
Is it possible that Bob was killed by a government agent and this is the reason why the police are refusing to investigate murder, fraud, theft, body snatching, perverting the course of justice and enterprise to Murder?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38902480
https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/police-informants-paid-more-360000-9446581
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2343764/Police-forces-pay-25million-informants-nearly-half-spent-London-s-Met.html#ixzz4SW1p0LtP
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8383313/gchq-drive-young-women-intelligence-agents-global-cyber-threats/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/hundreds-of-police-paid-for-by-businesses-parish-councils-and-locals-a6795186.html
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/uk-news/spy-agency-gchq-recruiting-jobs-16110304
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-security-idUKKCN11S0HN
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/17/stephen-lawrence-police-officer-allegedly-spied-family-identified-david-hagan
SILENCE IS GOLDEN
Christopher Freeman Dean Cheshire Police PSD
Chief Constable Darren Martland Cheshire Police
Ian Henderson T/Detective sergeant 4272, BTP Liverpool CID
Elaine Derrick Senior Advisor BTP Chief Constable’s Office
Michael Furness Head of Strategic Development at British Transport Police
Tina Ball (2997) Contact Handler FCC Birmingham
PC Lee 30094 Cheshire Police
Inspector Andy Irwin Porter 3371 British Transport Police
DS Joe Ford of Winsford Police Station Cheshire Police
Detective Sergeant Martin Heeley Fatalities Investigator at Blacon Police Station Cheshire Police
Inspector 5728 Leeroy Moss Cheshire Police Staff Officer to the Chief Constable
Detective Chief Inspector Blackburn British Transport Police
Kamal Saund PSD Professionalism Manager
shaun paul morgan Cheshire Police
2 police forces
14+ people
2 Chief Constables
2 Police Crime Commissoners
4 Inspectors
3 Sergeants
1 CID
1 PC
3 PSD
Multiple Contact Handlers
ICO contacted
IOPCC Contacted
RAIB Contacted
Rail Ombudsman Contacted
London Northwestern Railway Contacted
Railway customer relations line Contacted
45 DAYS since Bob was killed and we have had no questions answered, Legal NOK not contacted, Legal Agent acting on Bob's behalf not contacted, no arrests, no charges, no interviews and no evidence collected, Body not visually identified by anyone, media not updated......WHY
Below is an email sent to EVERY public servant involved in the alleged investigation
"
Hi,
I would like to make you aware of a death reported on the 31st July 2019 regarding a man called Robert Pickthall, he was killed at Acton Bridge Railway station on the night of the 30th July 2019 in Cheshire. The BTP officers that have been assigned to the investigation are making a mockery of this very serious incident, their lack of interest in collecting intelligence and their responses to members of the public including the NOK xxxxxxxx and legal agent acting on Bobs behalf is shocking to say the least. This is Operational Matter an ongoing live investigation and therefore your response is urgent,
Robert Pickthall has been clearly murdered in a way to make it look like a suicide and this would be proven if BTP officers did their job, instead they have been allowed a potential prime suspect to be the NOK xxxxxxxxx despite any documentation being provided, all of Bobs friends and neighbours would testify that he did not have a partner and xxxxx was never his partner. BTP officers did some investigation they would find out that Bob had told numerous people that he was not interested in a relationship with her, I find it shocking that BTP officers failed to ask any question before handing over Bob assets and even his body to a potential prime suspect in the murder of Bob. Xxxxxxx never once called herself the Partner until after Bob had died, you will find no one to support her narrative because it is a lie. Xxxxxxxx the only real NOK who has a legal document written in Bobs own handwriting and BTP officers are ignoring a legal document, his blood relatives such as his sister xxxxxx Pickthall and daughter xxxx Pickthall are also being pushed aside.
The failure to contact his family is disturbing despite a simple name search on xxxxxx would have found his sister xxxx and daughter xxxxxall living in Northwich, I believe the fake NOK xxxxx told BTP officers that he had no family in the country. For his family to find out on facebook that he died in this type of way is horrific, I would like to know why your officers refused to release his name in order to find his blood relatives and possible witness to incident. If it was not for his friends and the legal NOK his body would have been cremated and his family would not even have been aware that he was even dead, It seems careless or malicious to me. Bobs family attempted to meet xxxxxx over the weekend and I believe xxxxxxx called it off, is this someone who has any respect for his family.
The day Bob died it is reported that xxxxxx went to the solicitors all the way to Liverpool, she informed his friend and Neighbour xxxxxxx that she was moving into Bobs place. Its also be reported that she has taken all of his money and assets despite numerous members of the public informing BTP that he did not have a partner. Why is no one investigating this very obvious motive of murder, why is her xxxxx not being interviewed. She told Bob friends that she did not want any information to be released on facebook till her xxxxxxxxxxx was informed about Bobs death, this seemed to have been a delay tactic so the information could not be put out their in case the blood relatives of Bobs got in touch, its been very clearly that she wanted the Body cremated ASAP and if it wasnt for his friends and members of the public then this vital piece of evidence would have been destroyed. By indicating that her xxxxxxx was away also gives the illusion of an alibi does it not. Why are your officers not taking a sensible and practical approach to this case and why are they not challenging bureaucracy as stated in your Value statement. Why is xxxxx xxx not being questioned?
i would like to make you aware that the rail line company London Northwestern Rail who are responsible for Acton Bridge railway station have confirmed to me in two recorded phone calls which i can provide that there was no reports of anyone being hit by a train or any fatalities caused by impact of a train. They also said that there was no disruption to their railway lines in regard to to this incident, this is very surprising when their should have been an investigation at the scene to collect and preserve evidence.
I phoned up the Railway customer relations line and there was nothing on the railway control records, they did a none search for Acton Bridge, Acton Bridge search and searched railway logs, the railway customer relation officer even attempted to do a Google search. This phone call was repeated the next day with a different customer relation officer and the search was extended to the 30th July and the 1st of August with the same results.
I do not believe Bob was killed by an impact of a train, i do not believe he jumped/walked in front of a train. This was murder made to look like a suicide. If Bob was hit by a train then he was already dead before the impact of the train, his body could have been on the tracks hidden to the side and the driver of the train was not aware of him.
If it was dark and the train was at high speed the drive may not have seen or heard any impact, especially if it’s a ‘glancing’ blow, or the person is laid down already (which is body would be if he was killed and his body placed on the tracks).
The train should have stood down and moved to a depot for inspection once cleared by BTP, I would like to know if this was the case and if any forensic investigation took place . If the body was found on the tracks without any knowledge of a train driver being involved , they would have to have worked backwards and find the potential responsible units and get them visually inspected at the next opportunity, was this the case.
Sometime after the death XXXXXXX told his friends that she was at Bobs house when the allegedly took a tact to the station at around 2150 and she somehow knew he was on the tracks at 2215. How could someone allow their alleged partner to commit an alleged suicide like this, she then was awaken by a welfare call from the police, later that day she was in the solicitors in Liverpool. This is not someone who is grieving over a loved one loss. XXXXXX has also told Bobs friends that she got an email off Bob and she jumped in her car in a rush to save him, but she never reported him missing to the police at the time. There are screenshots and chats saved proving these statements are true. Alan XXXXX can confirm on hours before Bob died Bob had told him that XXXXXX was staying that nigh, i think it would be a good question ask why.
His friend Alan XXXXX phone Bobs Mobile Phone and she was disrespectful to Alan and told him to stop calling because Bob was dead. Bob was speaking to Alan via Wasapp 2 hours or so before his body was found and he was joking with Alan and in good spirits he even informed Alan what to do when and if the possibility that he was sent to prison on the 31st of July giving Alan the authority to act on his behalf excluding financial matters on the possibility that he could be sent to prison. This proves forward planing and proves that Bob changed his mind about suicide. It is also reported that Bob was with friends on the 30th July I believe one of those friends was called Tony and they did their weekly shopping in Iceland, this once again shows that Bob had no interest in ending his life that night especially with the news from the ICO supporting him get vital documents off the Council which would prove without any shadow of doubt he was wrongfully charges, sentenced and victimised by the Council for years which would have resulted in a multi million pound compensation claim.
I find it shocking that your officers did not take Bobs mobile phone and laptop for evidence, I am also shocked that you have allowed a potential suspect to have free access to his home and assets destroying and tampering with evidence at will. If this death took place at his home then, this whole investigation would look very different but because its happened at a railway station your officers are under the impression that they do not need to investigate its incompetence and malfeasances or just lazy policing.
Was there any CCTV requests made by BTP because there was CCTV at Acton Bridge railway station and BTP officers not to look for such material once again shows the lack of interest your officers have in investigating this case of Murder, why was there no appeals for information. I am aware BTP officer when into the pub The Hazel Pear and saw their CCTV but once again failed to inform anyone at the pub that Bob had died. We spoke to the owner and once again it was us that broke the news it was indeed Bob that had died, he was a regular at the pub where he eat. There has been no determination by BTP officers to investigate this murder, they have not strived to achieve the best results for the public or served the community, which goes against your Value statement.
We put up flowers and cards at Acton Bridge Railway station and we have people coming forward asking question who knows if one of them witnessed anything, how many witnesses have been losed because BTP officers failed to inform the public of his death breaking, how this a best results for the public. We visited the prime crime scene and i would like to know why you have not preserved it, why you have not put out an appeal for information. It appears that you have simply collected the body and done no forensic investigations. There was a red pen at the prime crime scene on the tracks and if you did some investigation you would know that pen came from a Manchester restaurant, if you did more investigation you would find out that Bob had been to Manchester on the 22nd of July a few days before his murder, if you did more investigations you would find out you can get a train from Manchester to Acton Bridge Station. You need to contact Rosso Restaurant in Manchester and see if he was with someone. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
If you study the James Bulger murder, it shows how murder does take place on the railway tracks and how the train on the railway is used to destroy evidence and give the illusion that the murder was suicide therefore no criminal investigation has to take place because suicide is not a criminal offence. just like the case of James Bulger this case is a very unusual and should be treated as suspicious. BTP officers need to take this case of Murder, theft, fraud and modern day body snatching seriously and stop making this into a joke, a man has lost his life, friends have lost a good friend, his neighbour has lost a good neighbour, his daughter has lost a father and his sister has lost a brother. Below is just an example of the incompetence and malfeasances in public office by BTP officers during this so called investigation not to mention what I have already written above.
I emailed a T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson 4272 from Liverpool CID and his response to me offering intelligence and information regarding the case of Bob was shocking, he mocked the idea of a possible murder despite clearly not being away of many if any facts. i offered to meet him in person at Northwich Police Station because I was already booked in that day to see an officer from Cheshire police regarding the fraud and theft relating to Adam Speker on the run up to Bob death. I thought T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson wanted to meet in person because he told me he did not want to discuss this case via email, he then T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson the meeting and told me I would not be meeting him.
I had been trying for weeks to get hold of someone to collect statements off persons of interest, I became aware of an email T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson sent to Alan XXXXXX and i suggested that he emailed back Alan XXXX and rephrase his question instead of asking for "material ref to acton bridge " he should be asking to collect statements about Bob and the events that led up to his death because i believe Alan has missunderstood the question which has been poorly written. Alan is vital to the investigation as he was the last person to speak to him alive on that day, he is also vital to the investigation because he would prove that these "Suicide letters" where in fact written weeks before he died saved in his draft email account to then be used as a cover for murder . I know this because he sent them out weeks ago, Alan received the email and went mad at Bob for even suggesting the idea of suicide. They both came to the conclusion and full understanding that suicide was not on the table.
I told T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson to contact the NOK, the only person who is legally qualified to be the NOK XXXXXX, her number is XXXXXX or email her at XXXXXXX and he never did.
T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson then threatened me with some type of time deadline and if I never responded in that time frame then I would be excluded from the case and none of my evidence and intelligence would be accepted by him. He then went on my Facebook page and emailed me saying he knows what I am posting on facebook, why is he not interested in solving this case. He is more interested in his bruised ego, he has shown no Integrity no respect and demonstrating n understanding of how to carry out an investigation.
This was not Suicide hours before he died he gave Alan the legal power of acting agent on his behalf because he was expected to be jailed. He wrote those "suicide" letters and saved them on his website email account in case he where to die in prison due to ill health or be killed, they where NOT SUICIDE LETTERS! these so called suicide letters where not suicide letters they where written for the purpose of his time in prison if he where to die in prison due to ill health or be killed, why has his laptop not been looked at, why did the officers refused to collect his mobile phone which would have had his last communication on. Why do these so called suicide letters seem to be being sent to Bobs other email address from robert_pickthall@aol.co.uk to bloodhound24@europe.com. When was his lap top handed over to BTP from the fake NOK?
There is no clearly evidence to support the theory of suicide and therefore BTP should not be assuming suicide. This case from the start should have been treated as suspicious because Bob was not killed by impact of a train. BTP should be investigating Murder and if BTP officers did their job correctly they would have captured the killers on CCTV from Acton Bridge Rail Station, why has this vital pieace of evidence not been processed. Bob was in fit state of mind on the night he was killed, he was not suffering from any psychological distress and was planning to continue the fight in jail which may I point out he could have won that court case because based on the fact that no evidence was presented have been presented against Bob the odds are with Bob...Especially when the ICO backed his decision that the Council have to hand of the made up evidence against him.
Bob had made plans for Alan xxxxx to deal with his affairs why being imprisoned excluding his finances. These all proves forward thinking and was not planning on killing himself. He was in the process of a possible multi million pound compensation claim against the council/police/moj/barristers, judges and media outlets. He was on the verge of signing a multi million pound movie contact with Lionsgate, he met representatives from that company in London with expenses paid for by Lionsgate.
Why did BTP officers tell the fake NOK xxxxxxx to delete her facebook page? there are so many question and not a single BTP officer is responding in fact they are telling people that they will not be responded to. How can this be an investigation if no one is being spoken too?
There has been NO INVESTIGATION into the Bobs case and this cover up has to stop, alls we want to know is who killed Bob and the fake NOK charged with fraud, theft, perverting the course of justice and possible conspiracy to murder. Not one single officer has shown any interest at all in investigating this case and its becoming very obvious that the police are complicit in this conspiracy why else would they behaving in this manner.
Why hasn't no one been questioned? You have a suspect xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. WHY IS THAT.
Why isnt xxxxxxx who is connected to xxxxxx not being questioned, he is xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x xxxx xxx together. xxxxxx was with xxxxxx xxxx x xxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx x
WHY WAS IT THAT xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxx x, MAYBE TO HIDE THEIR TRACKS.
There is no doubt that this is a conspiracy so why is no one being questioned who could be part of the conspiracy, why is it that not a single police officer is asking anyone any questions? Why till this day there has been no appeal for information or his death made public.
This was not suicide, there is too much unusual circumstances surrounding his death including the fact that it appears he was not killed by a train impact, his body was long dead before if any train came in contact with him. Please investigate my concerns and matters, help bring some integrity to this clown show of an investigation.
This case will not go away and neither will me or the people who loved Bob until one way or another justice is served. Please refer to Justice Watch Facebook page as we continue to upload evidence regarding this case @JusticeWatchMerseyside
thanks
David "
Christopher Freeman Dean Cheshire Police PSD
Chief Constable Darren Martland Cheshire Police
Ian Henderson T/Detective sergeant 4272, BTP Liverpool CID
Elaine Derrick Senior Advisor BTP Chief Constable’s Office
Michael Furness Head of Strategic Development at British Transport Police
Tina Ball (2997) Contact Handler FCC Birmingham
PC Lee 30094 Cheshire Police
Inspector Andy Irwin Porter 3371 British Transport Police
DS Joe Ford of Winsford Police Station Cheshire Police
Detective Sergeant Martin Heeley Fatalities Investigator at Blacon Police Station Cheshire Police
Inspector 5728 Leeroy Moss Cheshire Police Staff Officer to the Chief Constable
Detective Chief Inspector Blackburn British Transport Police
Kamal Saund PSD Professionalism Manager
shaun paul morgan Cheshire Police
2 police forces
14+ people
2 Chief Constables
2 Police Crime Commissoners
4 Inspectors
3 Sergeants
1 CID
1 PC
3 PSD
Multiple Contact Handlers
ICO contacted
IOPCC Contacted
RAIB Contacted
Rail Ombudsman Contacted
London Northwestern Railway Contacted
Railway customer relations line Contacted
45 DAYS since Bob was killed and we have had no questions answered, Legal NOK not contacted, Legal Agent acting on Bob's behalf not contacted, no arrests, no charges, no interviews and no evidence collected, Body not visually identified by anyone, media not updated......WHY
Below is an email sent to EVERY public servant involved in the alleged investigation
"
Hi,
I would like to make you aware of a death reported on the 31st July 2019 regarding a man called Robert Pickthall, he was killed at Acton Bridge Railway station on the night of the 30th July 2019 in Cheshire. The BTP officers that have been assigned to the investigation are making a mockery of this very serious incident, their lack of interest in collecting intelligence and their responses to members of the public including the NOK xxxxxxxx and legal agent acting on Bobs behalf is shocking to say the least. This is Operational Matter an ongoing live investigation and therefore your response is urgent,
Robert Pickthall has been clearly murdered in a way to make it look like a suicide and this would be proven if BTP officers did their job, instead they have been allowed a potential prime suspect to be the NOK xxxxxxxxx despite any documentation being provided, all of Bobs friends and neighbours would testify that he did not have a partner and xxxxx was never his partner. BTP officers did some investigation they would find out that Bob had told numerous people that he was not interested in a relationship with her, I find it shocking that BTP officers failed to ask any question before handing over Bob assets and even his body to a potential prime suspect in the murder of Bob. Xxxxxxx never once called herself the Partner until after Bob had died, you will find no one to support her narrative because it is a lie. Xxxxxxxx the only real NOK who has a legal document written in Bobs own handwriting and BTP officers are ignoring a legal document, his blood relatives such as his sister xxxxxx Pickthall and daughter xxxx Pickthall are also being pushed aside.
The failure to contact his family is disturbing despite a simple name search on xxxxxx would have found his sister xxxx and daughter xxxxxall living in Northwich, I believe the fake NOK xxxxx told BTP officers that he had no family in the country. For his family to find out on facebook that he died in this type of way is horrific, I would like to know why your officers refused to release his name in order to find his blood relatives and possible witness to incident. If it was not for his friends and the legal NOK his body would have been cremated and his family would not even have been aware that he was even dead, It seems careless or malicious to me. Bobs family attempted to meet xxxxxx over the weekend and I believe xxxxxxx called it off, is this someone who has any respect for his family.
The day Bob died it is reported that xxxxxx went to the solicitors all the way to Liverpool, she informed his friend and Neighbour xxxxxxx that she was moving into Bobs place. Its also be reported that she has taken all of his money and assets despite numerous members of the public informing BTP that he did not have a partner. Why is no one investigating this very obvious motive of murder, why is her xxxxx not being interviewed. She told Bob friends that she did not want any information to be released on facebook till her xxxxxxxxxxx was informed about Bobs death, this seemed to have been a delay tactic so the information could not be put out their in case the blood relatives of Bobs got in touch, its been very clearly that she wanted the Body cremated ASAP and if it wasnt for his friends and members of the public then this vital piece of evidence would have been destroyed. By indicating that her xxxxxxx was away also gives the illusion of an alibi does it not. Why are your officers not taking a sensible and practical approach to this case and why are they not challenging bureaucracy as stated in your Value statement. Why is xxxxx xxx not being questioned?
i would like to make you aware that the rail line company London Northwestern Rail who are responsible for Acton Bridge railway station have confirmed to me in two recorded phone calls which i can provide that there was no reports of anyone being hit by a train or any fatalities caused by impact of a train. They also said that there was no disruption to their railway lines in regard to to this incident, this is very surprising when their should have been an investigation at the scene to collect and preserve evidence.
I phoned up the Railway customer relations line and there was nothing on the railway control records, they did a none search for Acton Bridge, Acton Bridge search and searched railway logs, the railway customer relation officer even attempted to do a Google search. This phone call was repeated the next day with a different customer relation officer and the search was extended to the 30th July and the 1st of August with the same results.
I do not believe Bob was killed by an impact of a train, i do not believe he jumped/walked in front of a train. This was murder made to look like a suicide. If Bob was hit by a train then he was already dead before the impact of the train, his body could have been on the tracks hidden to the side and the driver of the train was not aware of him.
If it was dark and the train was at high speed the drive may not have seen or heard any impact, especially if it’s a ‘glancing’ blow, or the person is laid down already (which is body would be if he was killed and his body placed on the tracks).
The train should have stood down and moved to a depot for inspection once cleared by BTP, I would like to know if this was the case and if any forensic investigation took place . If the body was found on the tracks without any knowledge of a train driver being involved , they would have to have worked backwards and find the potential responsible units and get them visually inspected at the next opportunity, was this the case.
Sometime after the death XXXXXXX told his friends that she was at Bobs house when the allegedly took a tact to the station at around 2150 and she somehow knew he was on the tracks at 2215. How could someone allow their alleged partner to commit an alleged suicide like this, she then was awaken by a welfare call from the police, later that day she was in the solicitors in Liverpool. This is not someone who is grieving over a loved one loss. XXXXXX has also told Bobs friends that she got an email off Bob and she jumped in her car in a rush to save him, but she never reported him missing to the police at the time. There are screenshots and chats saved proving these statements are true. Alan XXXXX can confirm on hours before Bob died Bob had told him that XXXXXX was staying that nigh, i think it would be a good question ask why.
His friend Alan XXXXX phone Bobs Mobile Phone and she was disrespectful to Alan and told him to stop calling because Bob was dead. Bob was speaking to Alan via Wasapp 2 hours or so before his body was found and he was joking with Alan and in good spirits he even informed Alan what to do when and if the possibility that he was sent to prison on the 31st of July giving Alan the authority to act on his behalf excluding financial matters on the possibility that he could be sent to prison. This proves forward planing and proves that Bob changed his mind about suicide. It is also reported that Bob was with friends on the 30th July I believe one of those friends was called Tony and they did their weekly shopping in Iceland, this once again shows that Bob had no interest in ending his life that night especially with the news from the ICO supporting him get vital documents off the Council which would prove without any shadow of doubt he was wrongfully charges, sentenced and victimised by the Council for years which would have resulted in a multi million pound compensation claim.
I find it shocking that your officers did not take Bobs mobile phone and laptop for evidence, I am also shocked that you have allowed a potential suspect to have free access to his home and assets destroying and tampering with evidence at will. If this death took place at his home then, this whole investigation would look very different but because its happened at a railway station your officers are under the impression that they do not need to investigate its incompetence and malfeasances or just lazy policing.
Was there any CCTV requests made by BTP because there was CCTV at Acton Bridge railway station and BTP officers not to look for such material once again shows the lack of interest your officers have in investigating this case of Murder, why was there no appeals for information. I am aware BTP officer when into the pub The Hazel Pear and saw their CCTV but once again failed to inform anyone at the pub that Bob had died. We spoke to the owner and once again it was us that broke the news it was indeed Bob that had died, he was a regular at the pub where he eat. There has been no determination by BTP officers to investigate this murder, they have not strived to achieve the best results for the public or served the community, which goes against your Value statement.
We put up flowers and cards at Acton Bridge Railway station and we have people coming forward asking question who knows if one of them witnessed anything, how many witnesses have been losed because BTP officers failed to inform the public of his death breaking, how this a best results for the public. We visited the prime crime scene and i would like to know why you have not preserved it, why you have not put out an appeal for information. It appears that you have simply collected the body and done no forensic investigations. There was a red pen at the prime crime scene on the tracks and if you did some investigation you would know that pen came from a Manchester restaurant, if you did more investigation you would find out that Bob had been to Manchester on the 22nd of July a few days before his murder, if you did more investigations you would find out you can get a train from Manchester to Acton Bridge Station. You need to contact Rosso Restaurant in Manchester and see if he was with someone. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
If you study the James Bulger murder, it shows how murder does take place on the railway tracks and how the train on the railway is used to destroy evidence and give the illusion that the murder was suicide therefore no criminal investigation has to take place because suicide is not a criminal offence. just like the case of James Bulger this case is a very unusual and should be treated as suspicious. BTP officers need to take this case of Murder, theft, fraud and modern day body snatching seriously and stop making this into a joke, a man has lost his life, friends have lost a good friend, his neighbour has lost a good neighbour, his daughter has lost a father and his sister has lost a brother. Below is just an example of the incompetence and malfeasances in public office by BTP officers during this so called investigation not to mention what I have already written above.
I emailed a T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson 4272 from Liverpool CID and his response to me offering intelligence and information regarding the case of Bob was shocking, he mocked the idea of a possible murder despite clearly not being away of many if any facts. i offered to meet him in person at Northwich Police Station because I was already booked in that day to see an officer from Cheshire police regarding the fraud and theft relating to Adam Speker on the run up to Bob death. I thought T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson wanted to meet in person because he told me he did not want to discuss this case via email, he then T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson the meeting and told me I would not be meeting him.
I had been trying for weeks to get hold of someone to collect statements off persons of interest, I became aware of an email T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson sent to Alan XXXXXX and i suggested that he emailed back Alan XXXX and rephrase his question instead of asking for "material ref to acton bridge " he should be asking to collect statements about Bob and the events that led up to his death because i believe Alan has missunderstood the question which has been poorly written. Alan is vital to the investigation as he was the last person to speak to him alive on that day, he is also vital to the investigation because he would prove that these "Suicide letters" where in fact written weeks before he died saved in his draft email account to then be used as a cover for murder . I know this because he sent them out weeks ago, Alan received the email and went mad at Bob for even suggesting the idea of suicide. They both came to the conclusion and full understanding that suicide was not on the table.
I told T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson to contact the NOK, the only person who is legally qualified to be the NOK XXXXXX, her number is XXXXXX or email her at XXXXXXX and he never did.
T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson then threatened me with some type of time deadline and if I never responded in that time frame then I would be excluded from the case and none of my evidence and intelligence would be accepted by him. He then went on my Facebook page and emailed me saying he knows what I am posting on facebook, why is he not interested in solving this case. He is more interested in his bruised ego, he has shown no Integrity no respect and demonstrating n understanding of how to carry out an investigation.
This was not Suicide hours before he died he gave Alan the legal power of acting agent on his behalf because he was expected to be jailed. He wrote those "suicide" letters and saved them on his website email account in case he where to die in prison due to ill health or be killed, they where NOT SUICIDE LETTERS! these so called suicide letters where not suicide letters they where written for the purpose of his time in prison if he where to die in prison due to ill health or be killed, why has his laptop not been looked at, why did the officers refused to collect his mobile phone which would have had his last communication on. Why do these so called suicide letters seem to be being sent to Bobs other email address from robert_pickthall@aol.co.uk to bloodhound24@europe.com. When was his lap top handed over to BTP from the fake NOK?
There is no clearly evidence to support the theory of suicide and therefore BTP should not be assuming suicide. This case from the start should have been treated as suspicious because Bob was not killed by impact of a train. BTP should be investigating Murder and if BTP officers did their job correctly they would have captured the killers on CCTV from Acton Bridge Rail Station, why has this vital pieace of evidence not been processed. Bob was in fit state of mind on the night he was killed, he was not suffering from any psychological distress and was planning to continue the fight in jail which may I point out he could have won that court case because based on the fact that no evidence was presented have been presented against Bob the odds are with Bob...Especially when the ICO backed his decision that the Council have to hand of the made up evidence against him.
Bob had made plans for Alan xxxxx to deal with his affairs why being imprisoned excluding his finances. These all proves forward thinking and was not planning on killing himself. He was in the process of a possible multi million pound compensation claim against the council/police/moj/barristers, judges and media outlets. He was on the verge of signing a multi million pound movie contact with Lionsgate, he met representatives from that company in London with expenses paid for by Lionsgate.
Why did BTP officers tell the fake NOK xxxxxxx to delete her facebook page? there are so many question and not a single BTP officer is responding in fact they are telling people that they will not be responded to. How can this be an investigation if no one is being spoken too?
There has been NO INVESTIGATION into the Bobs case and this cover up has to stop, alls we want to know is who killed Bob and the fake NOK charged with fraud, theft, perverting the course of justice and possible conspiracy to murder. Not one single officer has shown any interest at all in investigating this case and its becoming very obvious that the police are complicit in this conspiracy why else would they behaving in this manner.
Why hasn't no one been questioned? You have a suspect xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. WHY IS THAT.
Why isnt xxxxxxx who is connected to xxxxxx not being questioned, he is xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x xxxx xxx together. xxxxxx was with xxxxxx xxxx x xxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx x
WHY WAS IT THAT xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxx x, MAYBE TO HIDE THEIR TRACKS.
There is no doubt that this is a conspiracy so why is no one being questioned who could be part of the conspiracy, why is it that not a single police officer is asking anyone any questions? Why till this day there has been no appeal for information or his death made public.
This was not suicide, there is too much unusual circumstances surrounding his death including the fact that it appears he was not killed by a train impact, his body was long dead before if any train came in contact with him. Please investigate my concerns and matters, help bring some integrity to this clown show of an investigation.
This case will not go away and neither will me or the people who loved Bob until one way or another justice is served. Please refer to Justice Watch Facebook page as we continue to upload evidence regarding this case @JusticeWatchMerseyside
thanks
David "
NORTHWICH CHIEF CONSTABLE DARREN MARTLAND TURNS A BLIND EYE TO BARRISTERS WHO COMMIT MAJOR FRAUD BY STEALING FROM THE TAX PAYER, TURNS A BLIND EYE TO STEALING FROM THE DEAD AND REFUSES TO DO THE JOB THAT HE IS PAID HANDSOMELY TO DO. READ THE PROOF FOR YOURSELF IN AN EMAIL I SENT TO HIM YESTERDAY (1st SEPTEMBER 2019)
From: Zelda Davies
Sent: 01 September 2019 09:25
To: Darren Martland <Darren.Martland@cheshire.pnn.police.uk>; Paul.Crowther@btp.pnn.police.uk; Police Crime Commissioner <Police.Crime.Commissioner@cheshire.pnn.police.uk>
Subject: Urgent Attention Required
Please be aware that as of today I give seven days notice for you to commence criminal investigations and authorize arrest warrants based on the information contained in the below attachment, at the end of which time should no such investigations have been authorized, my colleagues and I shall commence criminal proceedings ourselves.
Dear Chief Constable Martland, BTP Chief Constable Crowther (also for attention of Police
crime commissioner David Keane)
Re: Suspicious death of one Mr Robert Pickthall
As Mr. Pickthall’s personally appointed next of kin and having a legally standing hand written document signed and dated by him confirming this fact which I produced for the benefit of the coroner Mr Woods, and with which there is no dispute of authenticity, I demand that this merry go round of passing responsibility back and forth between BTP and police desist with immediate effect. I demand that the time wasting and stalling tactics by all officers desist with immediate effect, and I demand answers and accountability of every aspect of the repeated and continued failures in duty, breaches of police legislation, gross negligence, incompetence and non-feasance in public office. You must surely take credit for all the above as without an admittance to such, one must assume the non actions in this case to be of a more serious nature inclusive but not limited to conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and malfeasance in public office! Sirs, it is time you took this matter seriously.
With the exception of PCC, you are aware of the issues in this case; however for the benefit of the Crime commissioner let me reiterate:
Mr Robert Pickthall’s body was discovered at Acton Bridge train Station on 30th July 2019, we are led to believe by police that the cause of his death was suicide! We are also led to
believe that police visited Mr Pickthall’s house at approx. 6am where they were received into the premises by one Ms ******* ********* who informed them that she was his partner and next of kin as he had no relatives, from that moment on she was treated as such, at all times liaising with police and the coroner. We are led to believe that at the request of Ms
*********, police agreed not to release any details of Mr Pickthall’s identity for a week, until her son whom she claimed was away at the time, had been informed upon his return.
It is a fact, that quite by chance I discovered my dear friend was dead, supposedly killed by his own hand as it were and in the most horrendous of ways, had I not heard about his death he would by now have been cremated and that would have been the end to the matter. This cut and dried suicide theory falls apart as more and more evidence points to foul play which may well have resulted in murder. Numerous members of the public have contacted both Northwich police and BTP with their concerns about this, the evidence and facts to date prove more than enough to warrant a full investigation. Most certainly the evidence to arrest two prime suspects on other charges whilst further investigations take
place has been handed to your officers on a plate. Let me expand on this....
The first suspect: Ms ******* ********* as you well know for a fact has been positively proven to have lied to police by claiming to be Mr Pickthall’s partner when she was not and
never had been, and that she only started referring to herself as such after his death, you are aware that numerous people are able to confirm this.
It is a fact that Ms ********* also lied to police in claiming that Mr Pickthall had no blood relatives when she knew very well that he did, in fact having two daughters, a sister, a niece and four grandchildren all living in Northwich... however, it appears to be the case that your officers did not bother to follow procedures by making checks to confirm this information, and even when informed of it no action was taken.
It is a fact that numerous people including myself have contacted the coroner’s office to ensure he too knew of the facts in relation to the next of kin, all have spoken with one Ms
Kimberly Douglas who has mediated between concerned parties and the coroner Mr Woods!
It is a fact that I emailed the document confirming myself as next of kin to Ms Kimberly Douglas and also to Mr. Sean Morgan BTP at their requests. This document legally outweighs the mere word of anyone laying claim to be a non-blood next of kin.
It is a fact that in making such claim, despite having been a proven liar and impostor, your officers allowed Ms ********* to keep Mr Pickthall’s house keys and for at least three weeks
she was able to trawl through every possession he owned without challenge! It is a fact that he had various items of substantial worth in his house.
It is a fact which beggars belief that Ms ********* until recently was allowed to retain Mr Pickthall’s mobile phone which your officers knew or should have known, ought to have immediately been retrieved! Vital information re. calls he’d made and received that evening were never checked, one such call being to his good friend Mr Alan Dransfield with whom he’d been chatting and having banter with until at least 9.30pm, yet less than two hours later his dead body is found at a railway miles away from his home.....How dare your officers or yourselves take this information lightly.
It is a fact that Ms ********* claims Mr Pickthall “gifted” her all his money yet has not one shred of evidence to substantiate such an outrageous claim. Mr Pickthall was a very organised gentleman; it is agreed by all who knew him that if he had gifted her his money then he would have written a document confirming it in order to ensure the finger of suspicion were not pointed at her!
It is a fact that Ms ********* asked one Ms Karen Challinor to accompany her to Mr Pickthall’s solicitors on the very morning of his death, hardly the act of a grieving partner!
It is a fact that she has given at least three differing accounts of her whereabouts and actions in the couple of hours immediately before Mr. Pickthall’s death!
It is a fact that Mr Pickthall could not have been struck by the Liverpool to Euston flyer as police claim, because the timing of the train and the timing of Mr Pickthall supposedly leaving his home make that claim impossible!
It is a fact that I have emailed the coroner with a list of perfectly reasonable questions that would not in any way interfere with any investigation (even if there were a legitimate
investigation taking place) and he has refused to answer even one single question put to him yet Ms ******* ********* has been privy to all information despite having no authorized right to it.
Putting aside the murder aspect and taking account of all the above facts (not hearsay/speculation) but facts that can be substantiated by documentation, clearly you can see the criminal acts above committed by Ms ********* in order for you to arrest her and charge her. One must consider the reasons why you see fit not to do so!
I and other supporters of Justice for Robert Pickthall demand the immediate arrest of Ms ******* ********* for all crimes befitting her actions, I hereby give you seven days from the
date of this letter to do your jobs, at which time I will take it upon myself to deliver a laying of information to the criminal courts to do your jobs for you. As you can see, Ms *********
by committing the criminal acts as stated, has motive to murder Mr Pickthall, that motive being for substantial financial gain!
The second suspect: Top barrister Mr Adam Speker. You are aware chief Constable that on 14/08/19, I and others attended Northwich police station having driven over thirty miles fora pre booked appointment to discuss the criminal acts of the above named.
It is a fact that four days prior to this meeting, again having driven over thirty miles, we presented a laying of information I had drawn up a few years ago with the intention of pursuing serious criminal charges against Adam Speker.
It was my first attempt at anything of the kind and I succumbed to the corrupt court solicitor in his refusal to put it before the magistrates who would have obviously passed it to crown court being an indictable offence. I am now of a more determined disposition, most notably because if it were not for Mr Speker committing serious fraud and abusing the judicial process my dear friend would still be alive today.
It is a fact that the laying of information I and others presented to you is all that is required by way of evidence to have Mr Speker arrested and charged with the very serious criminal offences laid out therein. Your officers do not have to lift a finger, the charges are completely proven against Mr Speker, ironically he proved the case against himself in one of his own previous cases.
On my first visit to Northwich police station, the document I presented was forwarded to your legal team for verification of the facts and those facts have not been challenged, because of course they cannot be!
On our pre booked appointment, DS Lyons passed the matter to a young PC who had no idea why we were there, did not know the name of the persons we were there about, knewnothing of the laying of information document we had traveled thirty miles to present four days earlier and traveled another thirty miles to discuss at the pre booked interview, and he clearly did not understand the legality of what I was telling him. DS Lyons refused to speak with us on the matter and relayed to the young PC Lee that we should contact the bar standards....Sirs, is this incompetence, laziness or just plain stupidity? It is an insult to our intelligence which clearly we do not lack!
It is a fact that since the death of Mr Pickthall 5RB Chambers in London have removed their advertisement boasting of the victory of Adam Speaker’s fraudulent representation of CWaCC against Mr Pickthall which was a blatant promotion of fraud by false representation!
It is a fact that despite writing to 5RB Chambers, and the bar standards board, and over the years repeatedly posting on their website (which they kept removing) also posting over
social media numerous times of Adam Speker’s fraudulent representation and theft from the public purse, not once have I ever been challenged on it! why?....because the truth, proven by one of his own cases cannot be challenged!
It is a fact that barrister Adam Speker is directly involved with this case and I demand a warrant be issued for his immediate arrest to be charged with the serious crimes listed in the laying an information document which I did provide you with. I hereby give you seven days from the date of this letter to do your jobs at which time I will take it upon myself to deliver a laying of information to the criminal courts to do your jobs for you.
It is a fact that Mr Pickthall was on the verge of bringing CWaCC officials to account having finally obtained the backing of the ICO to enforce his data rights, he had everything to live for having battled Cheshire West and Chester Council for years.
It is a fact, that had he lived, many prominent figures in Northwich would be facing long prison terms, their most serious criminal acts would have been impossible if it were not for one man.....Barrister Adam Speker! A lot of influential people, powerful, important, and wealthy people all had a common interest in having Mr Pickthall silenced....what a
coincidence that he should be silenced just in time! It is not difficult to see why Adam Speker should be treated as a prime suspect.
If my perfectly justifiable demands are not met, and if your attempts to continue the avoidance of the arrests of the above-named criminals persist, then I and my fellow Campaigners for Justice for Robert Pickthall can only assume it is to protect the high-ranking police officers of Northwich who are also embroiled in this case. I strongly urge you to do some research on this as the issues are not going to go away until I see justice for my very dear friend
I look forward to your response
Kind regards
Ms Zelda Davies and others representing
TODAY I RECEIVED THIS RESPONSE:
Chief Constable <Chief.Constable@cheshire.pnn.police.uk>
Attachments
8:28 AM (13 hours ago)
to me, Professional
Good morning Mrs Davies,
Thank you for your email received into the Chief Constables mailbox on 01st September 2019 at 09:25hrs.
Unfortunately the Chief Constable does not become involved in the investigation of complaints and delegates that power to Professional Standards, whom he has trust and confidence in to do so with impartiality.
Professional Standards are Cc’d into this email and will review, you will receive a response direct from them in due course.
Kind regards
Rachel Wooldridge
Secretary to Chief Constable Martland
Cheshire Constabulary | Clemonds Hey | Oakmere Road | Winsford | Cheshire | CW7 2UA
Email: chief.constable@cheshire.pnn.police.uk
UPON VIEWING THIS RESPONSE I IMMEDIATELY EMAILED THE CHIEF CONSTABLES SECRETARY BACK , SEE BELOW :
Zelda Davies <minxyfang@gmail.com>
8:53 PM (1 hour ago)
to Chief
Dear Ms Wooldridge
With reference to my email dated 1st September 2019
Today 2nd September 2019 you sent me a response which is not relevant to my email. You stated that the Chief Constable does not get involved in complaints, that complaints are a matter for the professional standards department....I am somewhat confused by such a response as my email did not contain a complaint, it contained a matter for his urgent attention, a matter that falls within his remit of his role as Chief Constable, being an operational matter! Please ensure the Chief constable himself reads my email and confirm this to be so. There is now six days in which the Chief Constable has to deal with what is contained in my email at the end of which time not only shall I be taking the matter into my own hands by commencing criminal procedures against those therein mentioned but I shall also be issuing civil proceedings against the Chief Constable for numerous failures in duty that have caused me unspeakable alarm and distress, not to mention the infringement upon my time with having to do investigations and preparing and presenting trial bundles in order to bring criminals to justice which is the job of the police, a job that they are paid to do, it is not the job of a disabled grandmother!
Regards
Ms Zelda Davies, and others who put their trust in the police.
tag
From: Zelda Davies
Sent: 01 September 2019 09:25
To: Darren Martland <Darren.Martland@cheshire.pnn.police.uk>; Paul.Crowther@btp.pnn.police.uk; Police Crime Commissioner <Police.Crime.Commissioner@cheshire.pnn.police.uk>
Subject: Urgent Attention Required
Please be aware that as of today I give seven days notice for you to commence criminal investigations and authorize arrest warrants based on the information contained in the below attachment, at the end of which time should no such investigations have been authorized, my colleagues and I shall commence criminal proceedings ourselves.
Dear Chief Constable Martland, BTP Chief Constable Crowther (also for attention of Police
crime commissioner David Keane)
Re: Suspicious death of one Mr Robert Pickthall
As Mr. Pickthall’s personally appointed next of kin and having a legally standing hand written document signed and dated by him confirming this fact which I produced for the benefit of the coroner Mr Woods, and with which there is no dispute of authenticity, I demand that this merry go round of passing responsibility back and forth between BTP and police desist with immediate effect. I demand that the time wasting and stalling tactics by all officers desist with immediate effect, and I demand answers and accountability of every aspect of the repeated and continued failures in duty, breaches of police legislation, gross negligence, incompetence and non-feasance in public office. You must surely take credit for all the above as without an admittance to such, one must assume the non actions in this case to be of a more serious nature inclusive but not limited to conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and malfeasance in public office! Sirs, it is time you took this matter seriously.
With the exception of PCC, you are aware of the issues in this case; however for the benefit of the Crime commissioner let me reiterate:
Mr Robert Pickthall’s body was discovered at Acton Bridge train Station on 30th July 2019, we are led to believe by police that the cause of his death was suicide! We are also led to
believe that police visited Mr Pickthall’s house at approx. 6am where they were received into the premises by one Ms ******* ********* who informed them that she was his partner and next of kin as he had no relatives, from that moment on she was treated as such, at all times liaising with police and the coroner. We are led to believe that at the request of Ms
*********, police agreed not to release any details of Mr Pickthall’s identity for a week, until her son whom she claimed was away at the time, had been informed upon his return.
It is a fact, that quite by chance I discovered my dear friend was dead, supposedly killed by his own hand as it were and in the most horrendous of ways, had I not heard about his death he would by now have been cremated and that would have been the end to the matter. This cut and dried suicide theory falls apart as more and more evidence points to foul play which may well have resulted in murder. Numerous members of the public have contacted both Northwich police and BTP with their concerns about this, the evidence and facts to date prove more than enough to warrant a full investigation. Most certainly the evidence to arrest two prime suspects on other charges whilst further investigations take
place has been handed to your officers on a plate. Let me expand on this....
The first suspect: Ms ******* ********* as you well know for a fact has been positively proven to have lied to police by claiming to be Mr Pickthall’s partner when she was not and
never had been, and that she only started referring to herself as such after his death, you are aware that numerous people are able to confirm this.
It is a fact that Ms ********* also lied to police in claiming that Mr Pickthall had no blood relatives when she knew very well that he did, in fact having two daughters, a sister, a niece and four grandchildren all living in Northwich... however, it appears to be the case that your officers did not bother to follow procedures by making checks to confirm this information, and even when informed of it no action was taken.
It is a fact that numerous people including myself have contacted the coroner’s office to ensure he too knew of the facts in relation to the next of kin, all have spoken with one Ms
Kimberly Douglas who has mediated between concerned parties and the coroner Mr Woods!
It is a fact that I emailed the document confirming myself as next of kin to Ms Kimberly Douglas and also to Mr. Sean Morgan BTP at their requests. This document legally outweighs the mere word of anyone laying claim to be a non-blood next of kin.
It is a fact that in making such claim, despite having been a proven liar and impostor, your officers allowed Ms ********* to keep Mr Pickthall’s house keys and for at least three weeks
she was able to trawl through every possession he owned without challenge! It is a fact that he had various items of substantial worth in his house.
It is a fact which beggars belief that Ms ********* until recently was allowed to retain Mr Pickthall’s mobile phone which your officers knew or should have known, ought to have immediately been retrieved! Vital information re. calls he’d made and received that evening were never checked, one such call being to his good friend Mr Alan Dransfield with whom he’d been chatting and having banter with until at least 9.30pm, yet less than two hours later his dead body is found at a railway miles away from his home.....How dare your officers or yourselves take this information lightly.
It is a fact that Ms ********* claims Mr Pickthall “gifted” her all his money yet has not one shred of evidence to substantiate such an outrageous claim. Mr Pickthall was a very organised gentleman; it is agreed by all who knew him that if he had gifted her his money then he would have written a document confirming it in order to ensure the finger of suspicion were not pointed at her!
It is a fact that Ms ********* asked one Ms Karen Challinor to accompany her to Mr Pickthall’s solicitors on the very morning of his death, hardly the act of a grieving partner!
It is a fact that she has given at least three differing accounts of her whereabouts and actions in the couple of hours immediately before Mr. Pickthall’s death!
It is a fact that Mr Pickthall could not have been struck by the Liverpool to Euston flyer as police claim, because the timing of the train and the timing of Mr Pickthall supposedly leaving his home make that claim impossible!
It is a fact that I have emailed the coroner with a list of perfectly reasonable questions that would not in any way interfere with any investigation (even if there were a legitimate
investigation taking place) and he has refused to answer even one single question put to him yet Ms ******* ********* has been privy to all information despite having no authorized right to it.
Putting aside the murder aspect and taking account of all the above facts (not hearsay/speculation) but facts that can be substantiated by documentation, clearly you can see the criminal acts above committed by Ms ********* in order for you to arrest her and charge her. One must consider the reasons why you see fit not to do so!
I and other supporters of Justice for Robert Pickthall demand the immediate arrest of Ms ******* ********* for all crimes befitting her actions, I hereby give you seven days from the
date of this letter to do your jobs, at which time I will take it upon myself to deliver a laying of information to the criminal courts to do your jobs for you. As you can see, Ms *********
by committing the criminal acts as stated, has motive to murder Mr Pickthall, that motive being for substantial financial gain!
The second suspect: Top barrister Mr Adam Speker. You are aware chief Constable that on 14/08/19, I and others attended Northwich police station having driven over thirty miles fora pre booked appointment to discuss the criminal acts of the above named.
It is a fact that four days prior to this meeting, again having driven over thirty miles, we presented a laying of information I had drawn up a few years ago with the intention of pursuing serious criminal charges against Adam Speker.
It was my first attempt at anything of the kind and I succumbed to the corrupt court solicitor in his refusal to put it before the magistrates who would have obviously passed it to crown court being an indictable offence. I am now of a more determined disposition, most notably because if it were not for Mr Speker committing serious fraud and abusing the judicial process my dear friend would still be alive today.
It is a fact that the laying of information I and others presented to you is all that is required by way of evidence to have Mr Speker arrested and charged with the very serious criminal offences laid out therein. Your officers do not have to lift a finger, the charges are completely proven against Mr Speker, ironically he proved the case against himself in one of his own previous cases.
On my first visit to Northwich police station, the document I presented was forwarded to your legal team for verification of the facts and those facts have not been challenged, because of course they cannot be!
On our pre booked appointment, DS Lyons passed the matter to a young PC who had no idea why we were there, did not know the name of the persons we were there about, knewnothing of the laying of information document we had traveled thirty miles to present four days earlier and traveled another thirty miles to discuss at the pre booked interview, and he clearly did not understand the legality of what I was telling him. DS Lyons refused to speak with us on the matter and relayed to the young PC Lee that we should contact the bar standards....Sirs, is this incompetence, laziness or just plain stupidity? It is an insult to our intelligence which clearly we do not lack!
It is a fact that since the death of Mr Pickthall 5RB Chambers in London have removed their advertisement boasting of the victory of Adam Speaker’s fraudulent representation of CWaCC against Mr Pickthall which was a blatant promotion of fraud by false representation!
It is a fact that despite writing to 5RB Chambers, and the bar standards board, and over the years repeatedly posting on their website (which they kept removing) also posting over
social media numerous times of Adam Speker’s fraudulent representation and theft from the public purse, not once have I ever been challenged on it! why?....because the truth, proven by one of his own cases cannot be challenged!
It is a fact that barrister Adam Speker is directly involved with this case and I demand a warrant be issued for his immediate arrest to be charged with the serious crimes listed in the laying an information document which I did provide you with. I hereby give you seven days from the date of this letter to do your jobs at which time I will take it upon myself to deliver a laying of information to the criminal courts to do your jobs for you.
It is a fact that Mr Pickthall was on the verge of bringing CWaCC officials to account having finally obtained the backing of the ICO to enforce his data rights, he had everything to live for having battled Cheshire West and Chester Council for years.
It is a fact, that had he lived, many prominent figures in Northwich would be facing long prison terms, their most serious criminal acts would have been impossible if it were not for one man.....Barrister Adam Speker! A lot of influential people, powerful, important, and wealthy people all had a common interest in having Mr Pickthall silenced....what a
coincidence that he should be silenced just in time! It is not difficult to see why Adam Speker should be treated as a prime suspect.
If my perfectly justifiable demands are not met, and if your attempts to continue the avoidance of the arrests of the above-named criminals persist, then I and my fellow Campaigners for Justice for Robert Pickthall can only assume it is to protect the high-ranking police officers of Northwich who are also embroiled in this case. I strongly urge you to do some research on this as the issues are not going to go away until I see justice for my very dear friend
I look forward to your response
Kind regards
Ms Zelda Davies and others representing
TODAY I RECEIVED THIS RESPONSE:
Chief Constable <Chief.Constable@cheshire.pnn.police.uk>
Attachments
8:28 AM (13 hours ago)
to me, Professional
Good morning Mrs Davies,
Thank you for your email received into the Chief Constables mailbox on 01st September 2019 at 09:25hrs.
Unfortunately the Chief Constable does not become involved in the investigation of complaints and delegates that power to Professional Standards, whom he has trust and confidence in to do so with impartiality.
Professional Standards are Cc’d into this email and will review, you will receive a response direct from them in due course.
Kind regards
Rachel Wooldridge
Secretary to Chief Constable Martland
Cheshire Constabulary | Clemonds Hey | Oakmere Road | Winsford | Cheshire | CW7 2UA
Email: chief.constable@cheshire.pnn.police.uk
UPON VIEWING THIS RESPONSE I IMMEDIATELY EMAILED THE CHIEF CONSTABLES SECRETARY BACK , SEE BELOW :
Zelda Davies <minxyfang@gmail.com>
8:53 PM (1 hour ago)
to Chief
Dear Ms Wooldridge
With reference to my email dated 1st September 2019
Today 2nd September 2019 you sent me a response which is not relevant to my email. You stated that the Chief Constable does not get involved in complaints, that complaints are a matter for the professional standards department....I am somewhat confused by such a response as my email did not contain a complaint, it contained a matter for his urgent attention, a matter that falls within his remit of his role as Chief Constable, being an operational matter! Please ensure the Chief constable himself reads my email and confirm this to be so. There is now six days in which the Chief Constable has to deal with what is contained in my email at the end of which time not only shall I be taking the matter into my own hands by commencing criminal procedures against those therein mentioned but I shall also be issuing civil proceedings against the Chief Constable for numerous failures in duty that have caused me unspeakable alarm and distress, not to mention the infringement upon my time with having to do investigations and preparing and presenting trial bundles in order to bring criminals to justice which is the job of the police, a job that they are paid to do, it is not the job of a disabled grandmother!
Regards
Ms Zelda Davies, and others who put their trust in the police.
tag
NOT THE FIRST ATTEMPT TO KILL ROBERT PICKTHALL
If you’ve been following our findings on the death of Robert Pickthall (Bob) you’ll already know the FACTS that indicate his death was no suicide, It’s with all certainty that I make the claim that BOB WAS MURDERED, but who killed him? Let me share with you something that happened roughly three years ago, without access to Bob’s personal belongings I can’t give exact dates/ times nor present the documented evidence of what I’m about to share but those that know me, know that I’m not inclined to lie, I have no reason to....
Bob had a chronic heart condition; he’d suffered numerous heart attacks and undergone major heart surgery twice in the past, he’d become a regular visitor to Broad Green hospital where he was always seen by the same cardiologist.
Bob had been waiting for further open-heart surgery. Whilst visiting him at his home in Northwich he’d shown me a letter informing him that he’d been booked in for his op, I can’t remember which hospital it was, but we discussed the risks involved, open heart surgery is no minor thing, despite having survived two such operations it was still very risky.
Bob called the hospital to make enquiries as he hadn’t had an appointment for the usual pre op....he was told that there didn’t appear to be any pre op booked for him, the receptionist was quite surprised about this herself, and she confirmed that the theatre had definitely been booked for his major surgery, Bobs next question was what the name of the surgeon was who’d be performing the surgery, again there was absolutely nothing about the identity of the surgeon, Bob’s final question was who made the referral for him to have the op...again there was no information on the referring specialist.
Bob contacted his own cardiologist to ask if it was him, his cardiologist told him that if a referral were to be made, it would only come from him, BIT HE HAD NOT MADE THE REFERRAL!
Sometime within the following few days Bob received a telephone call from a chief executive at the hospital who told him that he was very worried about the whole situation and that upon further checks he’d found that Bob had only been BOOKED IN FOR OPEN HEART SURGERY FOR ONE DAY...the least a person is expected to stay after such surgery, if there’s no complications and the surgery goes well is seven to ten days, unless of course THE PATIENT DIES ON THE OPERATING TABLE in which case there’d only be a need for a one day booking! The chief executive told Bob he’d investigate further and re contact him when he found anything out.....BOB WAS NEVER CONTACTED AGAIN. Needless to say Bob decided not to contemplate having any operation again!
I repeatedly told Bob to take the matter further as I feared for his safety, he said he would, but he was so committed to his campaign to bring CWaCC to account and clear his name of their malicious lies of harassment that he simply never seemed to have the time.
I knew then that there were some very powerful people who didn’t like what Bob was exposing. WHO WERE THOSE PEOPLE? WHY WONT NORTHWICH POLICE INVESTIGATE?
KEEP YOURE EYE ON JW, WE HAVE A WHOLE LOT MORE TO TELL.
If you’ve been following our findings on the death of Robert Pickthall (Bob) you’ll already know the FACTS that indicate his death was no suicide, It’s with all certainty that I make the claim that BOB WAS MURDERED, but who killed him? Let me share with you something that happened roughly three years ago, without access to Bob’s personal belongings I can’t give exact dates/ times nor present the documented evidence of what I’m about to share but those that know me, know that I’m not inclined to lie, I have no reason to....
Bob had a chronic heart condition; he’d suffered numerous heart attacks and undergone major heart surgery twice in the past, he’d become a regular visitor to Broad Green hospital where he was always seen by the same cardiologist.
Bob had been waiting for further open-heart surgery. Whilst visiting him at his home in Northwich he’d shown me a letter informing him that he’d been booked in for his op, I can’t remember which hospital it was, but we discussed the risks involved, open heart surgery is no minor thing, despite having survived two such operations it was still very risky.
Bob called the hospital to make enquiries as he hadn’t had an appointment for the usual pre op....he was told that there didn’t appear to be any pre op booked for him, the receptionist was quite surprised about this herself, and she confirmed that the theatre had definitely been booked for his major surgery, Bobs next question was what the name of the surgeon was who’d be performing the surgery, again there was absolutely nothing about the identity of the surgeon, Bob’s final question was who made the referral for him to have the op...again there was no information on the referring specialist.
Bob contacted his own cardiologist to ask if it was him, his cardiologist told him that if a referral were to be made, it would only come from him, BIT HE HAD NOT MADE THE REFERRAL!
Sometime within the following few days Bob received a telephone call from a chief executive at the hospital who told him that he was very worried about the whole situation and that upon further checks he’d found that Bob had only been BOOKED IN FOR OPEN HEART SURGERY FOR ONE DAY...the least a person is expected to stay after such surgery, if there’s no complications and the surgery goes well is seven to ten days, unless of course THE PATIENT DIES ON THE OPERATING TABLE in which case there’d only be a need for a one day booking! The chief executive told Bob he’d investigate further and re contact him when he found anything out.....BOB WAS NEVER CONTACTED AGAIN. Needless to say Bob decided not to contemplate having any operation again!
I repeatedly told Bob to take the matter further as I feared for his safety, he said he would, but he was so committed to his campaign to bring CWaCC to account and clear his name of their malicious lies of harassment that he simply never seemed to have the time.
I knew then that there were some very powerful people who didn’t like what Bob was exposing. WHO WERE THOSE PEOPLE? WHY WONT NORTHWICH POLICE INVESTIGATE?
KEEP YOURE EYE ON JW, WE HAVE A WHOLE LOT MORE TO TELL.
British Transport Police, Police Standards Department refuses to record complaints about the clown show of an investigation of Bobs murder. If it was a police officer that was killed or "attacked" they would makes sure to investigate it and would be pressing charges within days. A member of the public is killed and they can't be bothered to investigate anything.
This is the email Geoffrey (Chief constable of the British Transport Police Paul Crowther, OBE) is too afraid to answer himself and has to use a small army to white wash these serious complaints of an investigation of murder .
Sorry for the retractions, i think you can still make sense of the email.
"Hi,
I would like to make you aware of a death reported on the 31st July 2019 regarding a man called Robert Pickthall, he was killed at Acton Bridge Railway station on the night of the 30th July 2019 in Cheshire. The officers that have been assigned to the investigation are making a mockery of this very serious incident, their lack of interest in collecting intelligence and their responses to members of the public including the NOK xxxxxx is shocking to say the least. This is an ongoing live investigation and therefore your response is urgent, you must put the customer the public first and deliver the very best level of services.
Robert Pickthall has been clearly murdered in a way to make it look like a suicide and this would be proven if your officers did their job, instead you have allowed xxxxxxxxx to be the NOK xxxxx despite any documentation being provided, all of Bobs friends and neighbours would testify that he did not have a partner and xxxxx was never his partner. If you officers did some investigation they would find out that Bob had told numerous people that he was not interested in a relationship with her, I find it shocking that your officers failed to ask any question before handing over Bob assets and even his body toxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx of Bob. xxxxxx never once called herself the Partner until after Bob had died, you will find no one to support her narrative because it is a lie. xxxxxx the only real NOK who has a legal document written in Bobs own handwriting and your officers are ignoring a legal document, his blood relatives such as his sister xxxxx and daughter xxxxxx are also being pushed aside.
The failure to contact his family is disturbing despite a simple name search on facebook would have found his sister xxxxx and daughter xxxxx all living in Northwich, I believe the fake NOK xxxx told officers that he had no family in the country. For his family to find out on facebook that he died in this type of way is horrific, I would like to know why your officers refused to release his name in order to find his blood relatives and possible witness to incident. If it was not for his friends and the legal NOK his body would have been cremated and his family would not even have been aware that he was even dead, It seems careless or malicious to me. Bobs family attempted to meet xxxxx over the weekend and I believe xxxxxxx called it off, is this someone who has any respect for his family.
The day Bob died it is reported that xxxxxxx went to the xxxxxxxxxx all the way to Liverpool, she informed his friend and Neighbour xxxxxxx that she was moving into Bobs place. Its also be reported that she has taken all of his money and assets despite numerous members of the public informing BTP that he did not have a partner. Why is no one investigating this very xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, why is her xxxxxx not being interviewed. She told Bob friends that she did not want any information to be released on facebook till her xxxxxx was informed about Bobs death, this seemed to have been a delay tactic so the information could not be put out their in case the blood relatives of Bobs got in touch, its been very clearly that she wanted the Body cremated ASAP and if it wasnt for his friends and members of the public then this vital piece of evidence would have been destroyed. By indicating that xxxxxxxx was away also gives the illusion of an alibi does it not. Why are your officers not taking a sensible and practical approach to this case and why are they not challenging bureaucracy as stated in your Value statement.
i would like to make you aware that the rail line company London Northwestern Rail who are responsible for Acton Bridge railway station have confirmed to me in two recorded phone calls which i can provide that there was no reports of anyone being hit by a train or any fatalities caused by impact of a train. They also said that there was no disruption to their railway lines in regard to to this incident, this is very surprising when their should have been an investigation at the scene to collect and preserve evidence.
I phoned up the Railway customer relations line and there was nothing on the railway control records, they did a none search for Acton Bridge, Acton Bridge search and searched railway logs, the railway customer relation officer even attempted to do a Google search. This phone call was repeated the next day with a different customer relation officer and the search was extended to the 30th July and the 1st of August with the same results.
I do not believe Bob was killed by an impact of a train, i do not believe he jumped/walked infront of a train. This was murder made to look like a suicide. If Bob was hit by a train then he was already dead before the impact of the train, his body could have been on the tracks hidden to the side and the driver of the train was not aware of him.
If it was dark and the train was at high speed the drive may not have seen or heard any impact, especially if it’s a ‘glancing’ blow, or the person is laid down already (which is body would be if he was killed and his body placed on the tracks).
The train should have stood down and moved to a depot for inspection once cleared by BTP, I would like to know if this was the case and if any forensic investigation took place . If the body was found on the tracks without any knowledge of a train driver being involved , they would have to have worked backwards and find the potential responsible units and get them visually inspected at the next opportunity, was this the case.
Sometime after the death xxxxxxx told his friends that xxxxxxx was at Bobs house when the allegedly took a taxi to the station at around 2150 and xxxxx somehow knew he was on the tracks at 2215. How could someone allow their xxxxxxx to commit an alleged suicide like this, xxxxx then was awaken by a welfare call from the police, later that day xxxx was in the xxxxx in Liverpool. This is not someone who is grieving over a loved one loss. xxxxxxx has also told Bobs friends that xxxxx got an email off Bob and she jumped in xxx car in a rush to save him, but xxx never reported him missing to the police at the time. There are screenshots and chats saved proving these statements are true. xxxxxx can confirm on hours before Bob died Bob had told him that xxxxxxx was staying that night, i think it would be a good question ask why.
His friend xxxxx phone Bobs Mobile Phone to see if Bob was doing about court that day 31st July and she was disrespectful to xxxx to stop calling because Bob was dead. Bob was speaking to xxxxx via Wasapp 2 hours or so before his body was found and he was joking with xxxx and in good spirits he even informed xxxx what to do when and if the possibility that he was sent down giving xxxx the authority to act on his behalf excluding financial matters. This proves forward planing and proves that Bob changed his mind about suicide. It is also reported that Bob was with friends on the 30th July I believe one of those friends was called xxxxx and they did their weekly shopping in Iceland, this once again shows that Bob had no interest in ending his life that night especially with the news from the ICO supporting him get vital documents off the Council which would prove without any shadow of doubt he was wrongfully charged, sentenced and victimised by the Council for years which would have resulted in a multi million pound compensation claim.
I find it shocking that your officers did not take Bobs mobile phone and laptop for evidence, I am also shocked that you have allowed xxxxxxxx to have free access to his home and assets destroying and tampering with evidence at will. If this death took place at his home then, this whole investigation would look very different but because its happened at a railway station your officers are under the impression that they do not need to investigate its incompetence and malfeasances or just lazy policing.
Was there any CCTV requests made by BTP because there was CCTV at Acton Bridge railway station and for your officers not to look for such material once again shows the lack of interest your officers have in investigating this case of Murder, why was there no appeals for information. I am aware that your officer when into the pub The Hazel Pear and saw their CCTV but once again you failed to inform anyone at the pub that Bob had died. We spoke to the owner and once again it was us that broke the news it was indeed Bob that had died, he was a regular at the pub where he eat. There has been no determination by your officers to investigate this murder, they have not strived to achieve the best results for the public or served the community, which goes against your Value statement.
We put up flowers and cards at Acton Bridge Railway station and we have people coming forward asking question who knows if one of them witnessed anything, how many witnesses have been losed because your officers failed to inform the public of his death breaking, how this a best results for the public.
If you study the James Bulger murder, it shows how murder does take place on the railway tracks and how the train on the railway is used to destroy evidence and give the illusion that the murder was suicide therefore no criminal investigation has to take place because suicide is not a criminal offence. just like the case of James Bulger this case is a very unusual and should be treated as suspicious. Your officers need to take this case of Murder, theft, fraud and modern day body snatching seriously and stop making this into a joke, a man has lost his life, friends have lost a good friend, his neighbour has lost a good neighbour, his daughter has lost a father and his sister has lost a brother. Below is just an example of the incompetence and malfeasances in public office by your officers during this so called investigation not to mention what I have already written above.
I emailed a T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson 4272 from Liverpool CID and his response to me offering intelligence and information regarding the case of Bob was shocking, he mocked the idea of a possible murder despite clearly not being away of many if any facts. i offered to meet him in person at Northwich Police Station because I was already booked in that day to see an officer from Cheshire police regarding the fraud and theft relating to Adam Speker on the run up to Bob death. I thought T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson wanted to meet in person because he told me he did not want to discuss this case via email, he then ttold me I would not be meeting him.
I had been trying for weeks to get hold of someone to collect statements off persons of interest, I became aware of an email T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson sent to xxxxxx and i suggested that he emailed back xxxxxx and rephrase his question instead of asking for "material ref to acton bridge " he should be asking to collect statements about Bob and the events that led up to his death because i believe xxxxx has misunderstood the question which has been poorly written. xxxxxx is vital to the investigation as he was the last person to speak to him alive on that day, he is also vital to the investigation because he would prove that these "Suicide letters" where in fact written weeks before he died saved in his draft email account to then be used as a cover for murder . I know this because he sent them out weeks ago, xxxxx received the email and went mad at Bob for even suggesting the idea of suicide. They both came to the conclusion and full understanding that suicide was not on the table.
I told T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson to contact the NOK, the only person who is legally qualified to be the NOK xxxxx, her number is 0xxxxxxx or email her at xxxxxxx and he never did.
T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson then threatened me with some type of time deadline and if I never responded in that time frame then I would be excluded from the case and none of my evidence and intelligence would be accepted by him. He then went on my Facebook page and emailed me saying he knows what I am posting on facebook, why is he not interested in solving this case. He is more interested in his bruised ego, he has shown no Integrity no respect and demonstrating n understanding of how to carry out an investigation.
This was not suicide, there is too much unusual circumstances surrounding his death including the fact that it appears he was not killed by a train impact, his body was long dead before if any train came in contact with him. Please investigate my concerns and matters, help bring some integrity to this clown show of an investigation.
Thanks"
Sorry for the retractions, i think you can still make sense of the email.
"Hi,
I would like to make you aware of a death reported on the 31st July 2019 regarding a man called Robert Pickthall, he was killed at Acton Bridge Railway station on the night of the 30th July 2019 in Cheshire. The officers that have been assigned to the investigation are making a mockery of this very serious incident, their lack of interest in collecting intelligence and their responses to members of the public including the NOK xxxxxx is shocking to say the least. This is an ongoing live investigation and therefore your response is urgent, you must put the customer the public first and deliver the very best level of services.
Robert Pickthall has been clearly murdered in a way to make it look like a suicide and this would be proven if your officers did their job, instead you have allowed xxxxxxxxx to be the NOK xxxxx despite any documentation being provided, all of Bobs friends and neighbours would testify that he did not have a partner and xxxxx was never his partner. If you officers did some investigation they would find out that Bob had told numerous people that he was not interested in a relationship with her, I find it shocking that your officers failed to ask any question before handing over Bob assets and even his body toxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx of Bob. xxxxxx never once called herself the Partner until after Bob had died, you will find no one to support her narrative because it is a lie. xxxxxx the only real NOK who has a legal document written in Bobs own handwriting and your officers are ignoring a legal document, his blood relatives such as his sister xxxxx and daughter xxxxxx are also being pushed aside.
The failure to contact his family is disturbing despite a simple name search on facebook would have found his sister xxxxx and daughter xxxxx all living in Northwich, I believe the fake NOK xxxx told officers that he had no family in the country. For his family to find out on facebook that he died in this type of way is horrific, I would like to know why your officers refused to release his name in order to find his blood relatives and possible witness to incident. If it was not for his friends and the legal NOK his body would have been cremated and his family would not even have been aware that he was even dead, It seems careless or malicious to me. Bobs family attempted to meet xxxxx over the weekend and I believe xxxxxxx called it off, is this someone who has any respect for his family.
The day Bob died it is reported that xxxxxxx went to the xxxxxxxxxx all the way to Liverpool, she informed his friend and Neighbour xxxxxxx that she was moving into Bobs place. Its also be reported that she has taken all of his money and assets despite numerous members of the public informing BTP that he did not have a partner. Why is no one investigating this very xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, why is her xxxxxx not being interviewed. She told Bob friends that she did not want any information to be released on facebook till her xxxxxx was informed about Bobs death, this seemed to have been a delay tactic so the information could not be put out their in case the blood relatives of Bobs got in touch, its been very clearly that she wanted the Body cremated ASAP and if it wasnt for his friends and members of the public then this vital piece of evidence would have been destroyed. By indicating that xxxxxxxx was away also gives the illusion of an alibi does it not. Why are your officers not taking a sensible and practical approach to this case and why are they not challenging bureaucracy as stated in your Value statement.
i would like to make you aware that the rail line company London Northwestern Rail who are responsible for Acton Bridge railway station have confirmed to me in two recorded phone calls which i can provide that there was no reports of anyone being hit by a train or any fatalities caused by impact of a train. They also said that there was no disruption to their railway lines in regard to to this incident, this is very surprising when their should have been an investigation at the scene to collect and preserve evidence.
I phoned up the Railway customer relations line and there was nothing on the railway control records, they did a none search for Acton Bridge, Acton Bridge search and searched railway logs, the railway customer relation officer even attempted to do a Google search. This phone call was repeated the next day with a different customer relation officer and the search was extended to the 30th July and the 1st of August with the same results.
I do not believe Bob was killed by an impact of a train, i do not believe he jumped/walked infront of a train. This was murder made to look like a suicide. If Bob was hit by a train then he was already dead before the impact of the train, his body could have been on the tracks hidden to the side and the driver of the train was not aware of him.
If it was dark and the train was at high speed the drive may not have seen or heard any impact, especially if it’s a ‘glancing’ blow, or the person is laid down already (which is body would be if he was killed and his body placed on the tracks).
The train should have stood down and moved to a depot for inspection once cleared by BTP, I would like to know if this was the case and if any forensic investigation took place . If the body was found on the tracks without any knowledge of a train driver being involved , they would have to have worked backwards and find the potential responsible units and get them visually inspected at the next opportunity, was this the case.
Sometime after the death xxxxxxx told his friends that xxxxxxx was at Bobs house when the allegedly took a taxi to the station at around 2150 and xxxxx somehow knew he was on the tracks at 2215. How could someone allow their xxxxxxx to commit an alleged suicide like this, xxxxx then was awaken by a welfare call from the police, later that day xxxx was in the xxxxx in Liverpool. This is not someone who is grieving over a loved one loss. xxxxxxx has also told Bobs friends that xxxxx got an email off Bob and she jumped in xxx car in a rush to save him, but xxx never reported him missing to the police at the time. There are screenshots and chats saved proving these statements are true. xxxxxx can confirm on hours before Bob died Bob had told him that xxxxxxx was staying that night, i think it would be a good question ask why.
His friend xxxxx phone Bobs Mobile Phone to see if Bob was doing about court that day 31st July and she was disrespectful to xxxx to stop calling because Bob was dead. Bob was speaking to xxxxx via Wasapp 2 hours or so before his body was found and he was joking with xxxx and in good spirits he even informed xxxx what to do when and if the possibility that he was sent down giving xxxx the authority to act on his behalf excluding financial matters. This proves forward planing and proves that Bob changed his mind about suicide. It is also reported that Bob was with friends on the 30th July I believe one of those friends was called xxxxx and they did their weekly shopping in Iceland, this once again shows that Bob had no interest in ending his life that night especially with the news from the ICO supporting him get vital documents off the Council which would prove without any shadow of doubt he was wrongfully charged, sentenced and victimised by the Council for years which would have resulted in a multi million pound compensation claim.
I find it shocking that your officers did not take Bobs mobile phone and laptop for evidence, I am also shocked that you have allowed xxxxxxxx to have free access to his home and assets destroying and tampering with evidence at will. If this death took place at his home then, this whole investigation would look very different but because its happened at a railway station your officers are under the impression that they do not need to investigate its incompetence and malfeasances or just lazy policing.
Was there any CCTV requests made by BTP because there was CCTV at Acton Bridge railway station and for your officers not to look for such material once again shows the lack of interest your officers have in investigating this case of Murder, why was there no appeals for information. I am aware that your officer when into the pub The Hazel Pear and saw their CCTV but once again you failed to inform anyone at the pub that Bob had died. We spoke to the owner and once again it was us that broke the news it was indeed Bob that had died, he was a regular at the pub where he eat. There has been no determination by your officers to investigate this murder, they have not strived to achieve the best results for the public or served the community, which goes against your Value statement.
We put up flowers and cards at Acton Bridge Railway station and we have people coming forward asking question who knows if one of them witnessed anything, how many witnesses have been losed because your officers failed to inform the public of his death breaking, how this a best results for the public.
If you study the James Bulger murder, it shows how murder does take place on the railway tracks and how the train on the railway is used to destroy evidence and give the illusion that the murder was suicide therefore no criminal investigation has to take place because suicide is not a criminal offence. just like the case of James Bulger this case is a very unusual and should be treated as suspicious. Your officers need to take this case of Murder, theft, fraud and modern day body snatching seriously and stop making this into a joke, a man has lost his life, friends have lost a good friend, his neighbour has lost a good neighbour, his daughter has lost a father and his sister has lost a brother. Below is just an example of the incompetence and malfeasances in public office by your officers during this so called investigation not to mention what I have already written above.
I emailed a T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson 4272 from Liverpool CID and his response to me offering intelligence and information regarding the case of Bob was shocking, he mocked the idea of a possible murder despite clearly not being away of many if any facts. i offered to meet him in person at Northwich Police Station because I was already booked in that day to see an officer from Cheshire police regarding the fraud and theft relating to Adam Speker on the run up to Bob death. I thought T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson wanted to meet in person because he told me he did not want to discuss this case via email, he then ttold me I would not be meeting him.
I had been trying for weeks to get hold of someone to collect statements off persons of interest, I became aware of an email T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson sent to xxxxxx and i suggested that he emailed back xxxxxx and rephrase his question instead of asking for "material ref to acton bridge " he should be asking to collect statements about Bob and the events that led up to his death because i believe xxxxx has misunderstood the question which has been poorly written. xxxxxx is vital to the investigation as he was the last person to speak to him alive on that day, he is also vital to the investigation because he would prove that these "Suicide letters" where in fact written weeks before he died saved in his draft email account to then be used as a cover for murder . I know this because he sent them out weeks ago, xxxxx received the email and went mad at Bob for even suggesting the idea of suicide. They both came to the conclusion and full understanding that suicide was not on the table.
I told T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson to contact the NOK, the only person who is legally qualified to be the NOK xxxxx, her number is 0xxxxxxx or email her at xxxxxxx and he never did.
T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson then threatened me with some type of time deadline and if I never responded in that time frame then I would be excluded from the case and none of my evidence and intelligence would be accepted by him. He then went on my Facebook page and emailed me saying he knows what I am posting on facebook, why is he not interested in solving this case. He is more interested in his bruised ego, he has shown no Integrity no respect and demonstrating n understanding of how to carry out an investigation.
This was not suicide, there is too much unusual circumstances surrounding his death including the fact that it appears he was not killed by a train impact, his body was long dead before if any train came in contact with him. Please investigate my concerns and matters, help bring some integrity to this clown show of an investigation.
Thanks"
The Chain of Command of the Cover up of Bobs (Robert Pickthall) Death
All of these persons are guilty of the cover up of Bobs murder, not one of these person are interested in investigating who killed Bob on the 30th July at Acton Bridge Railway Station. Not willing to investigate the theft and fraud surrounding his death, You have to ask WHY?
None of these so called professionals can see that this death is suspicious, as you can scroll down on our facebook timeline we have provided enough evidence to warrant an investigation surrounding the criminality around Bobs Death.
No doubt the list will be updated as the book is passed around and the can is kicked down the road by these cowards.
Feel free to contact them with your concerns, the more people contact them the better.
]
British Transport Police Chief Constable
paul.crowther@btp.pnn.police.uk
(refuses to read complaints about Bob's investigation)
Elaine Derrick Senior Advisor British Transport Police Chief Constable
elaine.derrick@btp.pnn.police.uk 020 7521 6437
(Opens and Reads the constables emails, forward complaints about Bob's investigation to Detective Chief Inspector Blackburn )
Detective Chief Inspector Blackburn
Chief Constable Darren Martland
Darren.Martland@cheshire.pnn.police.uk
Chief.Constable@cheshire.pnn.police.uk
(refuses to read complaints about Bob's investigation)
Inspector 5728 Leeroy Moss Cheshire Police Staff Officer to the Chief Constable
(Opens and Reads the constables emails, forward complaints about Bob's investigation to Mr Martland
Mr Martland Cheshire Police
(Forwards complains about Bobs investigation to the Police Standards Department)
Detective Sergeant Martin Heeley Fatalities Investigator at Blacon Police Station Cheshire Police
(Refuses to investigate the murder of Bob)
Detective Sergeant Christopher Freeman Dean Police Standards Department
christopher.freeman-dean@cheshire.pnn.police.uk>
(Opens and Reads the constables emails, refuses to investigate and forwards complaint about Bobs case to the BTP and Coroner’s office)
DS Joe Ford of Winsford Police Station Cheshire Police
(Refuses to investigate any criminality around Bobs death)
Ian Henderson T/Detective sergeant 4272, Liverpool CID British Transport Police
ian.henderson@btp.pnn.police.uk 07586547356 0151 255 4509
(Refuses to investigate murder,meet persons of interest and accept statements)
Inspector Andy Irwin Porter 3371 British Transport Police
(Refuses to pass complaint to Chief Constable instead sends complaint to PSD, Senior Management and Investigator Officer who the complaint is about)
PC Lee 30094 Cheshire Police
(He refused to contact the CPS, refused to investigate any criminality around Bobs death)
Mrs Louise Rhodes
Assistant Office Manager For H.M. Coroner for Cheshire
coronersadminteam@warrington.gov.uk 01925 444223
(Not interested in information provided about the Murder of Bob, still support the fake NOK and refuses to answer question)
Mr Alan G Moore
Coroner for H.M. Coroner for Cheshire
01925 444223
Kim Douglas
Coroners’ Officer
kimberley.douglas@cheshire.pnn.police.uk>
01606 36 6983
(Not interested in information provided about the Murder of Bob, still support the fake NOK and refuses to answer question)
All of these persons are guilty of the cover up of Bobs murder, not one of these person are interested in investigating who killed Bob on the 30th July at Acton Bridge Railway Station. Not willing to investigate the theft and fraud surrounding his death, You have to ask WHY?
None of these so called professionals can see that this death is suspicious, as you can scroll down on our facebook timeline we have provided enough evidence to warrant an investigation surrounding the criminality around Bobs Death.
No doubt the list will be updated as the book is passed around and the can is kicked down the road by these cowards.
Feel free to contact them with your concerns, the more people contact them the better.
]
British Transport Police Chief Constable
paul.crowther@btp.pnn.police.uk
(refuses to read complaints about Bob's investigation)
Elaine Derrick Senior Advisor British Transport Police Chief Constable
elaine.derrick@btp.pnn.police.uk 020 7521 6437
(Opens and Reads the constables emails, forward complaints about Bob's investigation to Detective Chief Inspector Blackburn )
Detective Chief Inspector Blackburn
Chief Constable Darren Martland
Darren.Martland@cheshire.pnn.police.uk
Chief.Constable@cheshire.pnn.police.uk
(refuses to read complaints about Bob's investigation)
Inspector 5728 Leeroy Moss Cheshire Police Staff Officer to the Chief Constable
(Opens and Reads the constables emails, forward complaints about Bob's investigation to Mr Martland
Mr Martland Cheshire Police
(Forwards complains about Bobs investigation to the Police Standards Department)
Detective Sergeant Martin Heeley Fatalities Investigator at Blacon Police Station Cheshire Police
(Refuses to investigate the murder of Bob)
Detective Sergeant Christopher Freeman Dean Police Standards Department
christopher.freeman-dean@cheshire.pnn.police.uk>
(Opens and Reads the constables emails, refuses to investigate and forwards complaint about Bobs case to the BTP and Coroner’s office)
DS Joe Ford of Winsford Police Station Cheshire Police
(Refuses to investigate any criminality around Bobs death)
Ian Henderson T/Detective sergeant 4272, Liverpool CID British Transport Police
ian.henderson@btp.pnn.police.uk 07586547356 0151 255 4509
(Refuses to investigate murder,meet persons of interest and accept statements)
Inspector Andy Irwin Porter 3371 British Transport Police
(Refuses to pass complaint to Chief Constable instead sends complaint to PSD, Senior Management and Investigator Officer who the complaint is about)
PC Lee 30094 Cheshire Police
(He refused to contact the CPS, refused to investigate any criminality around Bobs death)
Mrs Louise Rhodes
Assistant Office Manager For H.M. Coroner for Cheshire
coronersadminteam@warrington.gov.uk 01925 444223
(Not interested in information provided about the Murder of Bob, still support the fake NOK and refuses to answer question)
Mr Alan G Moore
Coroner for H.M. Coroner for Cheshire
01925 444223
Kim Douglas
Coroners’ Officer
kimberley.douglas@cheshire.pnn.police.uk>
01606 36 6983
(Not interested in information provided about the Murder of Bob, still support the fake NOK and refuses to answer question)
Paul Crowther OBE, chief constable of the British Transport Police is being protected by his officers by refusing to contact him regarding the murder of Bob Pickthall.
We contacted BTP switchboard and asked them for the email to the chief constable, they refused to give it. We had to make a log then send them an email for them to forward to the Chief Constable........an Inspector Andy Irwin Porter 3371 called me back and said he has taken my email and he would forward it the pointless PSD even though this is an urgent matter, he would forward it to the senior management and the investigator of the case even though the investigator of the case is part of the complaint to the Chief Constable ..........BUT HE WOULD NOT PASS IT ON TO THE CHIEF CONSTABLE!
We contacted BTP switchboard and asked them for the email to the chief constable, they refused to give it. We had to make a log then send them an email for them to forward to the Chief Constable........an Inspector Andy Irwin Porter 3371 called me back and said he has taken my email and he would forward it the pointless PSD even though this is an urgent matter, he would forward it to the senior management and the investigator of the case even though the investigator of the case is part of the complaint to the Chief Constable ..........BUT HE WOULD NOT PASS IT ON TO THE CHIEF CONSTABLE!
Just to confirm, there is a current NOK who is a fake put forward by the police with no documents/evidence. We have a legally documented NOK who police are ignoring and we have Bob's Sister who should be NOK but police are ignoring her too.
"Dear Sir, re. death of Mr. Robert Pickthall.
With the full authority and support from Mr. Pickthall's next of kin, being his sister xxxx and his daughter xxxxx, and having authority to make inquiries as an identified interested person, having provided you with a copy of a written authority given by Mr. Pickthall naming me as his next of kin, I am writing for information and to seek clarity on some extremely disturbing issues in this case. Can you please provide me with the following information:
How exactly did Mr Pickthall die?
In your professional opinion is the cause of death as stated absolutely conclusive?
Has a toxicology examination taken place? If so, what is the results?
Is it conclusive that Mr Pickthall died at the scene stated? being Acton Bridge railway station?
Was Mr Pickthall hit by a train?
Was Mr Pickthall's body retrieved intact or were his remains retrieved?
Where exactly on the grounds of Acton Bridge station was Mr Pickthall's body/remains retrieved?
Who discovered Mr Pickthall's body/remains?
What were the circumstances in the discovery....was there a call to police alerting them to the incident?
Who actually found Mr Pickthall's body/ remains?
How many officers attended the scene?
What have you calculated to be the time of Mr Pickthall's death?
How was Mr Pickthall identified?
At what time did the police contact the coroners office about Mr Pickthall's death?
In your professional opinion is this a definite and conclusive case of suicide?
What personal items/effects of Mr Pickthall's were retrieved from the scene?
Has it been established with confirmed facts how Mr Pickthall got to Acton Bridge? If so, how?
Was the scene cordoned off? if so, how long for?
Was Mr Pickthall's death for whatever reason treated only as a suicide?
Was at any time consideration given to the possibility that foul play may have been involved?
Was the area treated as a possible crime scene? If so what measures were taken in obtaining possible supporting evidence?
Were you given Mr Pickthall's mobile phone and computer to assist you with your investigations? These would have assisted you in confirming his last calls, times of calls and people he spoke to/ text messages etc.
Has any person identified Mr Pickthall by sighting his body?
Are you aware that the police left Ms xxxxxx with Mr Pickthall's mobile phone despite vital evidence being on it?
Did police instruct the coroner that xxxxxxx was Mr Pickthall's next of kin?
Are you aware that xxxxxxx lied to the police in claiming to be Mr Pickthall's next of kin? and that she was only a friend of his?
Are you aware that police simply took xxxxxxx word that Mr Pickthall had no blood related kin, and in fact made no effort to check if this was true?
Are you aware that Mr Pickthall has several blood related kin, inclusive of two daughters, a sister, a niece and four grandchildren, all of whom live in the same town as Mr Pickthall?
Mr Pickthall's family, though estranged, apart from his niece, were understandably caused great distress by discovering his death via social media, especially given the circumstances!
Are you aware that even when police were informed by a number of people that Mr Pickthall did in fact have blood relatives in the area, they still failed to inform them of his death?
Are you aware that xxxxxxxx did never at any time refer to herself as Mr Pickthall's partner until AFTER HIS DEATH? and that Mr Pickthall had always made it clear that she was nothing more than a friend, he had told this to other friends and neighbors and also to myself!
Are you aware that xxxxxx has given differing accounts of her actions and whereabouts in the last couple of hours before Mr Pickthall's death?
Are you aware that only two to three hours before Mr Pickthall's death he was speaking and having banter on the telephone with his friend xxxxxxx?
Are you aware that Mr Pickthall had that very evening given xxxxxxx instructions, that if he were to be imprisoned, to make telephone calls to four people informing them of how his incarceration could impact on his health? demonstrating therefore, that he was prepared to go to prison.!
Are you aware that xxxxxx has laid claim to all of Mr Pickthall's financial assets despite there being not one shred of evidence or documentation to prove this to be a legitimate claim?
Are you aware that the police know these facts yet refuse to investigate the legitimacy of such a claim?
Are you aware that Northwich police are refusing to investigate the possibility of foul play despite numerous people offering to give statements to the effect that they do not believe Mr Pickthall committed suicide?
Are you aware that Mr Pickthall had ongoing issues with CWaCC and after many years had finally gained the backing of the ICO which would prove irrefutably gross misconduct in public office by many officials within CwaCC?
Mr Pickthall had lived and breathed for this, he was on the verge of achieving accountability and justice, no rationally minded person could conclude that Mr Pickthall would decide to commit suicide at this time of his imminent victory!
Can you confirm if you have sent the necessary form identifying the cause of death to be registered? If so was this an interim form to record cause of death?
Can you please confirm where Mr Pickthall's body/ remains are?
Can you please confirm if you have released his body/remains for burial /cremation?
It has been confirmed that an inquest is to take place. If his body has been released, can you please explain why? as I find this most alarming given the contents of the email I sent about his extremely dubious death, and can you confirm if this is usual practice and procedure when members of the public are contacting the coroner with concerns of the deceased persons death being suspicious?
Are you aware that xxxxxx, an impostor, posing as next of kin, sole benefactor of Mr Pickthall's financial assets, intends to have him cremated which has always been against his wishes? If you have viewed the email and accompanying document I sent you will recall I alerted the BTP coroner of my concerns, that if foul play had occurred, which cannot realistically be ruled out without a thorough investigation with witnesses, of whom there are several, giving statements, then the coroner releasing Mr Pickthall's body for the purpose of cremation would in effect be complicit in allowing the destruction of possible crucial evidence relating to foul play/ murder!
I believe the above to be of great public concern and ask that you give it your full and immediate attention, I look forward to your response
Kind regards
xxxxxxxx "
Further to this email Justice Watch has sent the following
"i would like to make you aware that the rail line company London Northwestern Rail who are responsible for Acton Bridge railway station have confirmed to me in two recorded phone calls which i can provide that there was no reports of anyone being hit by a train or any fatalities caused by impact of a train. They also said that there was no disruption to their railway lines in regard to to this incident, this is very surprising when their should have been an investigation at the scene to collect and preserve evidence.
I phoned up the Railway customer relations line and there was nothing on the railway control records, they did a none search for Acton Bridge, Acton Bridge search and searched railway logs, the railway customer relation officer even attempted to do a Google search. This phone call was repeated the next day with a different customer relation officer and the search was extended to the 30th July and the 1st of August with the same results.
I do not believe Bob was killed by an impact of a train, i do not believe he jumped/walked infront of a train. This was murder made to look like a suicide. If Bob was hit by a train then he was already dead before the impact of the train, his body could have been on the tracks hidden to the side and the driver of the train was not aware of him.
This was not suicide, there is too much unusual circumstances surrounding his death including the fact that it appears he was not killed by a train impact.""
"Dear Sir, re. death of Mr. Robert Pickthall.
With the full authority and support from Mr. Pickthall's next of kin, being his sister xxxx and his daughter xxxxx, and having authority to make inquiries as an identified interested person, having provided you with a copy of a written authority given by Mr. Pickthall naming me as his next of kin, I am writing for information and to seek clarity on some extremely disturbing issues in this case. Can you please provide me with the following information:
How exactly did Mr Pickthall die?
In your professional opinion is the cause of death as stated absolutely conclusive?
Has a toxicology examination taken place? If so, what is the results?
Is it conclusive that Mr Pickthall died at the scene stated? being Acton Bridge railway station?
Was Mr Pickthall hit by a train?
Was Mr Pickthall's body retrieved intact or were his remains retrieved?
Where exactly on the grounds of Acton Bridge station was Mr Pickthall's body/remains retrieved?
Who discovered Mr Pickthall's body/remains?
What were the circumstances in the discovery....was there a call to police alerting them to the incident?
Who actually found Mr Pickthall's body/ remains?
How many officers attended the scene?
What have you calculated to be the time of Mr Pickthall's death?
How was Mr Pickthall identified?
At what time did the police contact the coroners office about Mr Pickthall's death?
In your professional opinion is this a definite and conclusive case of suicide?
What personal items/effects of Mr Pickthall's were retrieved from the scene?
Has it been established with confirmed facts how Mr Pickthall got to Acton Bridge? If so, how?
Was the scene cordoned off? if so, how long for?
Was Mr Pickthall's death for whatever reason treated only as a suicide?
Was at any time consideration given to the possibility that foul play may have been involved?
Was the area treated as a possible crime scene? If so what measures were taken in obtaining possible supporting evidence?
Were you given Mr Pickthall's mobile phone and computer to assist you with your investigations? These would have assisted you in confirming his last calls, times of calls and people he spoke to/ text messages etc.
Has any person identified Mr Pickthall by sighting his body?
Are you aware that the police left Ms xxxxxx with Mr Pickthall's mobile phone despite vital evidence being on it?
Did police instruct the coroner that xxxxxxx was Mr Pickthall's next of kin?
Are you aware that xxxxxxx lied to the police in claiming to be Mr Pickthall's next of kin? and that she was only a friend of his?
Are you aware that police simply took xxxxxxx word that Mr Pickthall had no blood related kin, and in fact made no effort to check if this was true?
Are you aware that Mr Pickthall has several blood related kin, inclusive of two daughters, a sister, a niece and four grandchildren, all of whom live in the same town as Mr Pickthall?
Mr Pickthall's family, though estranged, apart from his niece, were understandably caused great distress by discovering his death via social media, especially given the circumstances!
Are you aware that even when police were informed by a number of people that Mr Pickthall did in fact have blood relatives in the area, they still failed to inform them of his death?
Are you aware that xxxxxxxx did never at any time refer to herself as Mr Pickthall's partner until AFTER HIS DEATH? and that Mr Pickthall had always made it clear that she was nothing more than a friend, he had told this to other friends and neighbors and also to myself!
Are you aware that xxxxxx has given differing accounts of her actions and whereabouts in the last couple of hours before Mr Pickthall's death?
Are you aware that only two to three hours before Mr Pickthall's death he was speaking and having banter on the telephone with his friend xxxxxxx?
Are you aware that Mr Pickthall had that very evening given xxxxxxx instructions, that if he were to be imprisoned, to make telephone calls to four people informing them of how his incarceration could impact on his health? demonstrating therefore, that he was prepared to go to prison.!
Are you aware that xxxxxx has laid claim to all of Mr Pickthall's financial assets despite there being not one shred of evidence or documentation to prove this to be a legitimate claim?
Are you aware that the police know these facts yet refuse to investigate the legitimacy of such a claim?
Are you aware that Northwich police are refusing to investigate the possibility of foul play despite numerous people offering to give statements to the effect that they do not believe Mr Pickthall committed suicide?
Are you aware that Mr Pickthall had ongoing issues with CWaCC and after many years had finally gained the backing of the ICO which would prove irrefutably gross misconduct in public office by many officials within CwaCC?
Mr Pickthall had lived and breathed for this, he was on the verge of achieving accountability and justice, no rationally minded person could conclude that Mr Pickthall would decide to commit suicide at this time of his imminent victory!
Can you confirm if you have sent the necessary form identifying the cause of death to be registered? If so was this an interim form to record cause of death?
Can you please confirm where Mr Pickthall's body/ remains are?
Can you please confirm if you have released his body/remains for burial /cremation?
It has been confirmed that an inquest is to take place. If his body has been released, can you please explain why? as I find this most alarming given the contents of the email I sent about his extremely dubious death, and can you confirm if this is usual practice and procedure when members of the public are contacting the coroner with concerns of the deceased persons death being suspicious?
Are you aware that xxxxxx, an impostor, posing as next of kin, sole benefactor of Mr Pickthall's financial assets, intends to have him cremated which has always been against his wishes? If you have viewed the email and accompanying document I sent you will recall I alerted the BTP coroner of my concerns, that if foul play had occurred, which cannot realistically be ruled out without a thorough investigation with witnesses, of whom there are several, giving statements, then the coroner releasing Mr Pickthall's body for the purpose of cremation would in effect be complicit in allowing the destruction of possible crucial evidence relating to foul play/ murder!
I believe the above to be of great public concern and ask that you give it your full and immediate attention, I look forward to your response
Kind regards
xxxxxxxx "
Further to this email Justice Watch has sent the following
"i would like to make you aware that the rail line company London Northwestern Rail who are responsible for Acton Bridge railway station have confirmed to me in two recorded phone calls which i can provide that there was no reports of anyone being hit by a train or any fatalities caused by impact of a train. They also said that there was no disruption to their railway lines in regard to to this incident, this is very surprising when their should have been an investigation at the scene to collect and preserve evidence.
I phoned up the Railway customer relations line and there was nothing on the railway control records, they did a none search for Acton Bridge, Acton Bridge search and searched railway logs, the railway customer relation officer even attempted to do a Google search. This phone call was repeated the next day with a different customer relation officer and the search was extended to the 30th July and the 1st of August with the same results.
I do not believe Bob was killed by an impact of a train, i do not believe he jumped/walked infront of a train. This was murder made to look like a suicide. If Bob was hit by a train then he was already dead before the impact of the train, his body could have been on the tracks hidden to the side and the driver of the train was not aware of him.
This was not suicide, there is too much unusual circumstances surrounding his death including the fact that it appears he was not killed by a train impact.""
Why would the police and co conspirators in the murder of Bob create the illusion that he was hit by a train causing death?
I put forward the idea that Bob was NOT killed by a train, he did not jump/walk in front of a train and this was therefore not suicide. Its difficult to workout how Bob was killed because the Presstitutes, Police and Coroner are refusing to hand over ANY information which includes his name Robert Pickthall.
It was reported by the presstitutes that
“A man's body has been found on a railway line in Cheshire .
British Transport Police were called to Acton Bridge Station, near Northwich , at 12.02am yesterday (July 31).
Police were sent to the station following a report of a man on the tracks.
North West Ambulance also attended but sadly a man was pronounced dead at the scene.
Police have said the death is not being treated as suspicious.” - CheshireLive
'THE body of a man was found at Acton Bridge railway station in the early hours of this morning.
British Transport Police were alerted at 12.02am following a report of a casualty on the tracks.
A spokesman said: "Paramedics also attended but sadly a man was pronounced dead at the scene. The death is not being treated as suspicious. A report will now be prepared for the coroner."
The police, presstitutes and coroner gave the illusion that Bob committed suicide by stating a body was found on the tracks and the death is not being treated as suspicious, certain identities layed it on thick that Bob killed himself despite apparently not being aware of any facts. Justice Watch always stated from the start this was an alleged suicide, we never accepted suicide because there was no facts. As time went by it became more obvious there was an agenda to push this suicide theory despite all evidence pointing to a suicided, murdered to look like it was suicide.
By withholding information, the real Next Of Kin could not see the body or ask questions and the family couldn't do the same. No one made any effort to contact his family despite them living in Northwich, so this theory of suicide could continue to manipulate the way people understood events and passed conversations. This colouring of events was on purpose, to hide the unusual circumstances surrounded his death.
If people knew that THERE WAS NO ONE HIT BY A TRAIN on the dates between the 30th July -1st August then people would be asking some questions. When there was no delays between those dates in relation to Bob then people would be asking questions.
We know this to be a fact confirmed twice by the railway company and evidential by both of their twitter feeds. Bob was NOT HIT BY A TRAIN so how was he killed? We phoned up Railway customer relations and there was nothing on the railway control records, they did a none search for Acton Bridge, Acton Bridge search and searched railway logs, the railway customer relation officer even attempted a google search. This phone call was repeated the next day with a different customer relation officer and the search was extended to the 30th July and the 1st of August with the same results.
If EVERYONE assumed Bob was hit by a train then what would be the need for an investigation. Evidence does not need to be preserved because suicide is not a criminal offense, no one needs to ask questions. Was this why they wanted to keep Bobs death secret? people are not asking the right questions because they assume they have the answers.
So you have to ask the question what is the agenda behind this suicide by train theory and why are people so keen to promote this theory when in fact the evidence is looking more and more like a conspiracy to murder to look like a suicide, SUICIDED.
I put forward the idea that Bob was NOT killed by a train, he did not jump/walk in front of a train and this was therefore not suicide. Its difficult to workout how Bob was killed because the Presstitutes, Police and Coroner are refusing to hand over ANY information which includes his name Robert Pickthall.
It was reported by the presstitutes that
“A man's body has been found on a railway line in Cheshire .
British Transport Police were called to Acton Bridge Station, near Northwich , at 12.02am yesterday (July 31).
Police were sent to the station following a report of a man on the tracks.
North West Ambulance also attended but sadly a man was pronounced dead at the scene.
Police have said the death is not being treated as suspicious.” - CheshireLive
'THE body of a man was found at Acton Bridge railway station in the early hours of this morning.
British Transport Police were alerted at 12.02am following a report of a casualty on the tracks.
A spokesman said: "Paramedics also attended but sadly a man was pronounced dead at the scene. The death is not being treated as suspicious. A report will now be prepared for the coroner."
The police, presstitutes and coroner gave the illusion that Bob committed suicide by stating a body was found on the tracks and the death is not being treated as suspicious, certain identities layed it on thick that Bob killed himself despite apparently not being aware of any facts. Justice Watch always stated from the start this was an alleged suicide, we never accepted suicide because there was no facts. As time went by it became more obvious there was an agenda to push this suicide theory despite all evidence pointing to a suicided, murdered to look like it was suicide.
By withholding information, the real Next Of Kin could not see the body or ask questions and the family couldn't do the same. No one made any effort to contact his family despite them living in Northwich, so this theory of suicide could continue to manipulate the way people understood events and passed conversations. This colouring of events was on purpose, to hide the unusual circumstances surrounded his death.
If people knew that THERE WAS NO ONE HIT BY A TRAIN on the dates between the 30th July -1st August then people would be asking some questions. When there was no delays between those dates in relation to Bob then people would be asking questions.
We know this to be a fact confirmed twice by the railway company and evidential by both of their twitter feeds. Bob was NOT HIT BY A TRAIN so how was he killed? We phoned up Railway customer relations and there was nothing on the railway control records, they did a none search for Acton Bridge, Acton Bridge search and searched railway logs, the railway customer relation officer even attempted a google search. This phone call was repeated the next day with a different customer relation officer and the search was extended to the 30th July and the 1st of August with the same results.
If EVERYONE assumed Bob was hit by a train then what would be the need for an investigation. Evidence does not need to be preserved because suicide is not a criminal offense, no one needs to ask questions. Was this why they wanted to keep Bobs death secret? people are not asking the right questions because they assume they have the answers.
So you have to ask the question what is the agenda behind this suicide by train theory and why are people so keen to promote this theory when in fact the evidence is looking more and more like a conspiracy to murder to look like a suicide, SUICIDED.
Yesterday we traveled 40 miles to Northwich Police Station for a PRE BOOKED appointment, we handed over documentation the day we made the appointment so we can discuss the case on the pre booked appointment.
We where shocked to meet a PC not a an inspector not a sergeant but a PC, he had no idea why we was there despite falsely claiming he read our documents.
We had to wait for 30mins for a room to be available even tho it was PRE BOOKED.
He was asked to name Bob and couldn't
he was asked to name his on duty inspector and couldn't
he was asked to name a sergeant he spoke to and couldn't
he was asked to name his Chief Constable and couldn't
He refused to contact the CPS, refused to investigate any criminality, it was very clear they sent this newbie down to get rid of us and play dumb. This meeting was witnessed by 3 people and a video recording is available, the behavior of the police is disgusting and suspicious.
Why will they not investigate Murder, theft, fraud, tampering with evidence and modern day body snatching?
Why cant the legally qualified NOK be the NOK?
Why cant Bobs family be NOK?
WHAT ARE THEY HIDING??
VIDEO WILL BE RELEASED VERY VERY SOON
We where shocked to meet a PC not a an inspector not a sergeant but a PC, he had no idea why we was there despite falsely claiming he read our documents.
We had to wait for 30mins for a room to be available even tho it was PRE BOOKED.
He was asked to name Bob and couldn't
he was asked to name his on duty inspector and couldn't
he was asked to name a sergeant he spoke to and couldn't
he was asked to name his Chief Constable and couldn't
He refused to contact the CPS, refused to investigate any criminality, it was very clear they sent this newbie down to get rid of us and play dumb. This meeting was witnessed by 3 people and a video recording is available, the behavior of the police is disgusting and suspicious.
Why will they not investigate Murder, theft, fraud, tampering with evidence and modern day body snatching?
Why cant the legally qualified NOK be the NOK?
Why cant Bobs family be NOK?
WHAT ARE THEY HIDING??
VIDEO WILL BE RELEASED VERY VERY SOON
Police are still refusing to accept the real Next Of Kin who has legal certified documents and refusing to allow blood relatives to take back is keys to his house, property and body
Why are the police so keen to keep this imposter as the NOK, despite EVERYONE who knows Bob is telling the police he DID NOT HAVE A PARTNER.
This imposter just so happened to have stayed at Bob house the day he died to answer the knock on the door by the Police to look as if she was his partner. She has no legal documents she has no one supporting her lies apart from the Police.
She wants to get the body cremated despite going against the wishes of the legally proven NOK, his family, his friends and not to mention his OWN WISHES! IS THIS TO DESTROY EVIDENCE
It is believed that the Police haven’t got Bobs keys back for his house from the imposter, when his sister tried to claim NOK POLICE TOLD HER TO CONTACT BOBS FAMILY (ie) NEAREST BLOOD RELATIVE BEING HIS DAUGHTER..... HIS SISTER STILL TRUMPES THE IMPOSTER AS NOK. Bobs daughter gave consent for his sister to act as NOK, POLICE HAVE TOLD THEM TO WAIT FOR THE IMPOSTER TO CONTACT THE FAMILY!
THIS IS HORRIFIC!
tag
Why are the police so keen to keep this imposter as the NOK, despite EVERYONE who knows Bob is telling the police he DID NOT HAVE A PARTNER.
This imposter just so happened to have stayed at Bob house the day he died to answer the knock on the door by the Police to look as if she was his partner. She has no legal documents she has no one supporting her lies apart from the Police.
She wants to get the body cremated despite going against the wishes of the legally proven NOK, his family, his friends and not to mention his OWN WISHES! IS THIS TO DESTROY EVIDENCE
It is believed that the Police haven’t got Bobs keys back for his house from the imposter, when his sister tried to claim NOK POLICE TOLD HER TO CONTACT BOBS FAMILY (ie) NEAREST BLOOD RELATIVE BEING HIS DAUGHTER..... HIS SISTER STILL TRUMPES THE IMPOSTER AS NOK. Bobs daughter gave consent for his sister to act as NOK, POLICE HAVE TOLD THEM TO WAIT FOR THE IMPOSTER TO CONTACT THE FAMILY!
THIS IS HORRIFIC!
tag
THIS MAN IS LINING HIS POCKETS BY STEALING FROM YOU THE PUBLIC. HE KNOWS IT, THE BAR STANDARDS KNOW IT, THE POLICE KNOW IT, AND THEY’RE ALL LAUGHING AT YOU BECAUSE NOW YOU KNOW TOO AND THERES NOTHING YOU’RE PREPARED TO DO ABOUT IT.
Video will be released tomorrow and a full report of our visit to Nortwich Police Station today which will prove that this whole "investigation" from beginning has just been one big joke to the police.....you will not believe what we witnessed
We will get to the bottom of who and how they killed Bob
Video will be released tomorrow and a full report of our visit to Nortwich Police Station today which will prove that this whole "investigation" from beginning has just been one big joke to the police.....you will not believe what we witnessed
We will get to the bottom of who and how they killed Bob
the police and coroner attempts to hide the death of Bob not only from the public but also his family has failed. Bob will not be silenced in death infact his voice will be amplified, we have only just got started.
You can now pay your respects to Bob, leave some flowers and a card exposing this murder. PLEASE TAPE all flowers and cards to the post for safety reasons.
tag
You can now pay your respects to Bob, leave some flowers and a card exposing this murder. PLEASE TAPE all flowers and cards to the post for safety reasons.
tag
(REPOST OF AN EARLIER POST FOR PUBLIC RECORD, DELETED IT BY MISTAKE August 9 at 5:20 PM)
The real Next Of Kin has spoken and has a legal document proving that she is the real NOK.
So who is the fake partner that the police and Coroner have identified as NOK?
3 close friends of Bob have stated he did not have a partner and it was for sure not the person that they are claiming. The Cheshire Police have been informed about this document along with British Transport police and the Coroner.
"To whom it may concern, urgent attention required in matter of the death of Mr Robert Pickthall. It is my belief that foul play may be involved. I believe the woman claiming to be NOK xxxxxxxx has made such claim for illegitimate purposes. xxxxxxx did begin only after Mr Pickthal’sl death to refer to herself as his partner, this is untrue. I do not know how this woman has managed to convince officials with such apparent ease, without supporting documentation that she is NOK. In the absence of proof of such claim I myself lay claim to being NOK and provide below Mr Pickthal’sl hand written verification of such, together with confirmation of authorisation to deal with all actions on his behalf. This authority is clearly signed and dated by Mr Pickthall. It is my belief that Mr Pickthal’sl finances have been plundered and that more than an assisted suicide has taken place here. I request a full toxicology examination of Mr Pickthall’s remains and a full police investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death. It is my belief that xxxxxxxxx is eager to have Mr Pickthall’s body cremated as soon as possible. As his lawfully identified NOK I strongly contest this. Please contact me at your earliest convenience. The covering and or eliminating of possible forensic evidence of at the very least an assisted suicide must be prevented, action to preserve such evidence must be taken without delay"
Background story https://www.facebook.com/…/a.9079300526506…/2167435290033406
The real Next Of Kin has spoken and has a legal document proving that she is the real NOK.
So who is the fake partner that the police and Coroner have identified as NOK?
3 close friends of Bob have stated he did not have a partner and it was for sure not the person that they are claiming. The Cheshire Police have been informed about this document along with British Transport police and the Coroner.
"To whom it may concern, urgent attention required in matter of the death of Mr Robert Pickthall. It is my belief that foul play may be involved. I believe the woman claiming to be NOK xxxxxxxx has made such claim for illegitimate purposes. xxxxxxx did begin only after Mr Pickthal’sl death to refer to herself as his partner, this is untrue. I do not know how this woman has managed to convince officials with such apparent ease, without supporting documentation that she is NOK. In the absence of proof of such claim I myself lay claim to being NOK and provide below Mr Pickthal’sl hand written verification of such, together with confirmation of authorisation to deal with all actions on his behalf. This authority is clearly signed and dated by Mr Pickthall. It is my belief that Mr Pickthal’sl finances have been plundered and that more than an assisted suicide has taken place here. I request a full toxicology examination of Mr Pickthall’s remains and a full police investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death. It is my belief that xxxxxxxxx is eager to have Mr Pickthall’s body cremated as soon as possible. As his lawfully identified NOK I strongly contest this. Please contact me at your earliest convenience. The covering and or eliminating of possible forensic evidence of at the very least an assisted suicide must be prevented, action to preserve such evidence must be taken without delay"
Background story https://www.facebook.com/…/a.9079300526506…/2167435290033406
High flying barrister who represented council against Bob has committed serious criminal offences.
Police have been given documentation to positively prove that high flying barrister who represented council against Bob has committed serious criminal offences and massive fraud in order to pervert the course of justice.
We requested that the police legal team examine the documented evidence given to them. Today we travel to Northwich Police Station and we will find out if Northwich police are going to act on this evidence and arrest the criminal barrister or if they are going to make excuses and sweep it under the carpet like they tried to with claiming Bobs blood relatives couldn’t be found.
If police don’t take us seriously now then I think we should push for another police force to take over the case.
More info......
Illegally obtained gagging order brought under the guise of an harassment order of the harassment act 1997 by Cheshire west and Chester council for the purpose of silencing Robert Pickthall from revealing to the public the theft of protected public land, namely butchers stile playing fields was to day exposed for the corrupt scam that it was. In a hearing at Manchester high court before Lord justice Soole who is usually found to be sitting at London royal court of justice, Mr Pickthall pleaded mitigation in what was his committal hearing for breaching the illegally obtained injunction. Mr Pickthall exposed Barrister Adam Speker of 5RB chambers, London and Cheshire west and Chester council legal department and named other public servants as having committed an estimated £20,000 fraud by funding the case against him which they where not lawfully entitled to do.
Mr Pickthall further exposed Barrister Adam Speker had known right from the beginning that he was committing an illegal act having defended in an identical case in which he himself pointed out the illegality and had the case dismissed. This can be confirmed by visiting 5RB website. The above criminality having clearly been exposed in the court room should automatically have render the injunction taken against Mr Pickthall as invalid therefore it could not be breached ,the law states that any act that no person should benefit from the unlawful act of another.
Mr Picthall exposure of this criminality in the court room was not challenged nor quieied in any way by either Mr Speaker nor Lord Justice Soole. Unbelievably rather then attempt to protect the public interest by instigating a public enquirer in to such corruption in his court room Mr Justice Soole chose to ignore such criminality, corruption and ordered that Mr Pickthall being imprisoned at Strangeways prison of the period of three months. Mr Pickthall stated for the record that he had never once been allowed to present the evidence in his defence nor would the evidence which Cheshire West claimed to hold in order to justify the issuing of the injunction ever produced standard disclosure was repeatedly denied to Mr Pickthall by a number of order Judges who had been involved in the case, in effect Mr Pickthall was sent to prison with no substantial evidence against him, no trail and opportunity to present his case.
Police have been given documentation to positively prove that high flying barrister who represented council against Bob has committed serious criminal offences and massive fraud in order to pervert the course of justice.
We requested that the police legal team examine the documented evidence given to them. Today we travel to Northwich Police Station and we will find out if Northwich police are going to act on this evidence and arrest the criminal barrister or if they are going to make excuses and sweep it under the carpet like they tried to with claiming Bobs blood relatives couldn’t be found.
If police don’t take us seriously now then I think we should push for another police force to take over the case.
More info......
Illegally obtained gagging order brought under the guise of an harassment order of the harassment act 1997 by Cheshire west and Chester council for the purpose of silencing Robert Pickthall from revealing to the public the theft of protected public land, namely butchers stile playing fields was to day exposed for the corrupt scam that it was. In a hearing at Manchester high court before Lord justice Soole who is usually found to be sitting at London royal court of justice, Mr Pickthall pleaded mitigation in what was his committal hearing for breaching the illegally obtained injunction. Mr Pickthall exposed Barrister Adam Speker of 5RB chambers, London and Cheshire west and Chester council legal department and named other public servants as having committed an estimated £20,000 fraud by funding the case against him which they where not lawfully entitled to do.
Mr Pickthall further exposed Barrister Adam Speker had known right from the beginning that he was committing an illegal act having defended in an identical case in which he himself pointed out the illegality and had the case dismissed. This can be confirmed by visiting 5RB website. The above criminality having clearly been exposed in the court room should automatically have render the injunction taken against Mr Pickthall as invalid therefore it could not be breached ,the law states that any act that no person should benefit from the unlawful act of another.
Mr Picthall exposure of this criminality in the court room was not challenged nor quieied in any way by either Mr Speaker nor Lord Justice Soole. Unbelievably rather then attempt to protect the public interest by instigating a public enquirer in to such corruption in his court room Mr Justice Soole chose to ignore such criminality, corruption and ordered that Mr Pickthall being imprisoned at Strangeways prison of the period of three months. Mr Pickthall stated for the record that he had never once been allowed to present the evidence in his defence nor would the evidence which Cheshire West claimed to hold in order to justify the issuing of the injunction ever produced standard disclosure was repeatedly denied to Mr Pickthall by a number of order Judges who had been involved in the case, in effect Mr Pickthall was sent to prison with no substantial evidence against him, no trail and opportunity to present his case.
NCOMPETENCE OR COVER UP?
Last night the blood NOK contacted JW and has liaised with named NOK of Bob. Shocked at having found out about her fathers death via social media one can only imagine the distress and horror Bobs blood relatives felt at learning the imposter that police had allowed to lay claim to Bobs body was about to have him cremated without them even being aware of his death. How can such serious maladministration happen? Bobs blood family have now stepped in and contacted coroner telling him to desist with treating the imposter as NOK.
NEXT QUESTION.... WILL THE POLICE NOW TAKE WHAT WE SAY OF FOUL PLAY SERIOUSLY? BOBS BLOOD KIN AGREE THAT THERE LOOKS TO BE VERY SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING HIS DEATH..... why are the police so eager to dismiss this as a conspiracy theory?
Last night the blood NOK contacted JW and has liaised with named NOK of Bob. Shocked at having found out about her fathers death via social media one can only imagine the distress and horror Bobs blood relatives felt at learning the imposter that police had allowed to lay claim to Bobs body was about to have him cremated without them even being aware of his death. How can such serious maladministration happen? Bobs blood family have now stepped in and contacted coroner telling him to desist with treating the imposter as NOK.
NEXT QUESTION.... WILL THE POLICE NOW TAKE WHAT WE SAY OF FOUL PLAY SERIOUSLY? BOBS BLOOD KIN AGREE THAT THERE LOOKS TO BE VERY SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING HIS DEATH..... why are the police so eager to dismiss this as a conspiracy theory?
Lead “investigator” Ian Henderson T/Detective sergeant 4272, Liverpool CID is more interested in my social media posts then investigating MURDER, theft, fraud and modern day BODY SNATCHING
Not interested at all in collecting statements, collecting and preserving evidence or investigating a man being killed, none of these officers are fit enough to even mention Bobs name. They are taking the piss out of the public intelligence, anyone with a brain cell can see this death should be treated as suspicious.
They can't even work out who the next of kin is despite a legal document being presented to them that basically spells it out in Bobs own handwriting who is the Next of kin.
THIS IS A JOKE OF AN INVESTIGATION
Ian Henderson 4272, Liverpool CID
British Transport Police, 2nd floor Rail House, Lord Nelson St, Liverpool
Office Direct: 0151 255 4509
Mobile: 07586547356
Email:ian.henderson@btp.pnn.police.uk
Not interested at all in collecting statements, collecting and preserving evidence or investigating a man being killed, none of these officers are fit enough to even mention Bobs name. They are taking the piss out of the public intelligence, anyone with a brain cell can see this death should be treated as suspicious.
They can't even work out who the next of kin is despite a legal document being presented to them that basically spells it out in Bobs own handwriting who is the Next of kin.
THIS IS A JOKE OF AN INVESTIGATION
Ian Henderson 4272, Liverpool CID
British Transport Police, 2nd floor Rail House, Lord Nelson St, Liverpool
Office Direct: 0151 255 4509
Mobile: 07586547356
Email:ian.henderson@btp.pnn.police.uk
There was a conspiracy to kill (Suicided) Bob and now a conspiracy to hide it!
Conspiracy:
A secret plan by more then one person to do something unlawful or harmful.
Conspiracy Theorist:
A term made fashionable by the CIA government agents during Operation Mocking Bird, this can be read on CIA document 1035: 90 titled “Countering Criticism”
This was to counter criticism of the Warren Report and journalists questioning the murder of JFK
Suicided:
when someone is murdered and then arranged in such a way to make the death seem like a suicide.
the victim may also be forced to take his own life so that the real culprit leaves little to no evidence of wrongdoing. authorities rule the cause of death to be a plain old suicide which often means that no investigation is preformed.
Conspiracy:
A secret plan by more then one person to do something unlawful or harmful.
Conspiracy Theorist:
A term made fashionable by the CIA government agents during Operation Mocking Bird, this can be read on CIA document 1035: 90 titled “Countering Criticism”
This was to counter criticism of the Warren Report and journalists questioning the murder of JFK
Suicided:
when someone is murdered and then arranged in such a way to make the death seem like a suicide.
the victim may also be forced to take his own life so that the real culprit leaves little to no evidence of wrongdoing. authorities rule the cause of death to be a plain old suicide which often means that no investigation is preformed.
Lead investigator refuses to meet members of the public to make statements and be interviewed on record in regard to a possible murder of Bob, what type of investigation is this?
T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson 4272, Liverpool CID
Call him on 07586547356
Email at Ian.henderson@btp.pnn.police.uk
T/Detective sergeant Ian Henderson 4272, Liverpool CID
Call him on 07586547356
Email at Ian.henderson@btp.pnn.police.uk
Why would Bob use an email program to write a “suicide” letter which it is alleged he sent via Royal Mail 2 days before he died to his neighbour, did they not have an email address?
Why write in hand the address on envelope but not sign the letter?
Why would he text his neighbour for their post code?
Why does it look like the person who is writing this letter is sending it out via email to what appears to be one of Bobs email addresses?
We know another person had passwords to his accounts, why is this not being chased up?
THE POLICE DID NOT SEIZE THE LETTER OR ENVELOPE FOR EVIDENCE
tag
Why write in hand the address on envelope but not sign the letter?
Why would he text his neighbour for their post code?
Why does it look like the person who is writing this letter is sending it out via email to what appears to be one of Bobs email addresses?
We know another person had passwords to his accounts, why is this not being chased up?
THE POLICE DID NOT SEIZE THE LETTER OR ENVELOPE FOR EVIDENCE
tag
Why hasn't the prime crime scene not been preserved,
why has it been repainted. What are they hiding?
Made no appeals to the public for information ?
Identity hidden, why?
Why release the body to someone with no evidence provided to prove that they are Next Of Kin?
Why are the police refusing to answer any questions put forward not just by Bobs friends but the public. These public servants they work for us, we demand an investigation!
why has it been repainted. What are they hiding?
Made no appeals to the public for information ?
Identity hidden, why?
Why release the body to someone with no evidence provided to prove that they are Next Of Kin?
Why are the police refusing to answer any questions put forward not just by Bobs friends but the public. These public servants they work for us, we demand an investigation!
Cheshire Police refuse to take reports of Murder, fraud, theft, tampering with evidence and modern day body snatching seriously.
We traveled over 30 miles to Northwitch Police Station in Cheshire in order to report these very serious crimes and every Inspector and Sergeant refused to come down from their thrones of corruption and speak to us. Told us to contact British Transport Police.....Contact British Transport Police who then tell us to contact Cheshire Police.
WHY ARE THESE PUBLIC SERVANTS REFUSING TO DO THEIR JOB!
We traveled over 30 miles to Northwitch Police Station in Cheshire in order to report these very serious crimes and every Inspector and Sergeant refused to come down from their thrones of corruption and speak to us. Told us to contact British Transport Police.....Contact British Transport Police who then tell us to contact Cheshire Police.
WHY ARE THESE PUBLIC SERVANTS REFUSING TO DO THEIR JOB!
